Re: [CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute [and 1 more messages]

2012-08-14 Thread Ian Jackson
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: [CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute"): > Looks like it landed to -devel still. AFAICT the missing ingredient is > that you need to *also* get rid of In-Reply-To headers (an overly > paranoid measure to avoid that people by mistake spawn threads on

Re: [CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute

2012-08-14 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 07:13:54PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > (an overly paranoid measure to avoid that people by mistake spawn > threads on d-d-a, by replying to announces posted there). Err, bad choice of words on my part: I do not think the measure in itself is excessive, it is in fact

Re: [CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute [and 1 more messages]

2012-08-14 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute"): > Also apparently I need to sign my email. My first message has just > vanished and my second went to debian-devel even though I sent it to > -devel-announce. I will try again. Sorry again... Ian Jackson writes

Re: [CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute

2012-08-14 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 06:05:33PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Also apparently I need to sign my email. My first message has just > vanished and my second went to debian-devel even though I sent it to > -devel-announce. I will try again. Sorry again... Looks like it landed to -devel still. AFAI

[CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute

2012-08-14 Thread Ian Jackson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 The question of evince's failure to supply a mime type entry for pdfs was referred to the Technical Committee, after the release team decided that it was a release critical bug. The TC has made the following decision: 1. The Technical Committee

Re: [CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute

2012-08-14 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute"): > I wrote: > > The question of evince's failure to supply a mime type entry for pdfs > > was referred to the Technical Committee, after the release team > > decided that it was a release critical bug. > > Sorry, I

Re: [CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute

2012-08-14 Thread Ian Jackson
I wrote: > The question of evince's failure to supply a mime type entry for pdfs > was referred to the Technical Committee, after the release team > decided that it was a release critical bug. Sorry, I failed to edit the bug number in the subject line. I'm sending this followup to make this annou