Le 19/06/2012 16:20, Alastair McKinstry a écrit :
> While i'm still investigating, _something_ in the sid environment is the
> real culprit and
> I can't assign a bug to it yet until I pin it down. Has anyone seen a
> similar issue elsewhere,
> or got a hint as to how to handle it? I want to make
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Albert Huang
* Package name: tilem
Version : 2.0.0
Upstream Author : TilEm2
* URL : http://lpg.ticalc.org/prj_tilem/
* License : GPL, LGPL, GFDL
Programming Lang: C
Description : GTK+ TI Z80 calculator emulator
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sylvain Le Gall
* Package name: ocamlrss
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Maxence Guesdon
* URL : http://zoggy.github.com/ocamlrss/
* License : LGPL + BSD
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : RSS 2.0 parser and pr
Hello,
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:11:33 -0700
Josh Triplett wrote:
> Variables in the .bss section will by definition get initialized to 0.
> For example, a C variable defined as "static typename varname;" must
> get initialized to 0, and the compiler and linker will stick it in
> the .bss section e
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:56:18 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > I will be happy to get involved; upstream irqbalance is on my list
> > of things that are broken and needs to be fixed. Will try and get a hold
>
> Could you elaborate on thi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
For those who do not read Planet Debian, here is the report from the Debian
BSP in Salzburg (markdown/ikiwiki source, sorry for not re-formatting it :))
Participation and Results
- ---
- From June 15-17th we held a Debian Bu
Andrew Shadura wrote:
> By the way, it might be a good idea to fill .bss section with random
> values intentionally for debug builds to detect non-properly-initialised
> things more effectively :)
Variables in the .bss section will by definition get initialized to 0.
For example, a C variable defi
Hello,
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:03:17 +0200
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Try gcc/g++ 4.6 instead of 4.7. Maybe check if "S-Lang load
> path" (wherever that is stored) is initialized in a sane way. I had a
> similar issue where an integer was 0 all the time - although not
> being initialized with somethi
Hi,
> I've an interesting problem: bug #675125.
> Its a grave bug against slang2, as it breaks jed, (and other things).
> slang2-2.2.14-12+ (in sid) breaks jed for certain locales (C is broken,
> *.UTF-8 look fine);
> but slang2_2.2.14-10 (in testing) looks fine.
>
> The trouble is, while downgr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ole Streicher
* Package name: python-astropy
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Erik Tollerud
* URL : http://astropy.org
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python, C
Description : core functionality for performing a
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:04:31PM +0200, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
> repository but not still in a numbered version, so, I tried to use the
> latest known version and add a ~TIMESTAMPgit... to the minor version
> number, but debuild warns me about the version 0.1.0~2012..git-1 is
> less th
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 05:04:46PM +0200, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
> > I see several solutions there, and the hardening-wrapper one is in my
> > opinion the worst one: it adds a build dependency and it uses own set of
> > configuration variables, not compatible with dpkg-buildflags ones.
> Yes
El 19/06/12 16:56, Andrey Rahmatullin escribió:
> I see several solutions there, and the hardening-wrapper one is in my
> opinion the worst one: it adds a build dependency and it uses own set of
> configuration variables, not compatible with dpkg-buildflags ones.
Yes, it adds a build-dependency...
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:42:33PM +0200, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
> > Why do you need hardening-wrapper? You should use flags set by
> > dpkg-buildflags.
> Because that
> (http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#Notes_for_packages_using_CMake),
> referred by lintian-info too. Using it I only need to
El 19/06/12 16:10, Andrey Rahmatullin escribió:
> Why do you need hardening-wrapper? You should use flags set by
> dpkg-buildflags.
Because that
(http://wiki.debian.org/Hardening#Notes_for_packages_using_CMake),
referred by lintian-info too. Using it I only need to define "export
DEB_BUILD_HARDENIN
Hi,
I've an interesting problem: bug #675125.
Its a grave bug against slang2, as it breaks jed, (and other things).
slang2-2.2.14-12+ (in sid) breaks jed for certain locales (C is broken,
*.UTF-8 look fine);
but slang2_2.2.14-10 (in testing) looks fine.
The trouble is, while downgrading to -10 fi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Stapelberg
* Package name: libiniparser
Version : 3.1
Upstream Author : Nicolas Devillard
* URL : http://ndevilla.free.fr/iniparser/
* License : MIT/X11
Programming Lang: C
Description : stand-alone ini f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Neil, Dear debian-devel list members,
please accept my honest pardon for my infamous demeanor. It was meant
as light-hearted joke, a mind fart - when I was done writing the three
lines I almost ditched it, and obviously should have. After all,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 04:04:31PM +0200, José Luis Segura Lucas wrote:
> I have read the output of lintian-info -t about
> hardening-no-fortify-functions, and it helps a lot. The software uses
> Cmake as build tool, and the "hardening-wrapper" solution solved some
> lintian warnings, but not the l
Hi!
I'm intending to package a new software for Debian [1]. I just completed
most of the package work and have a lintian-error free package, but I
still have a warning that is driving me crazy.
I have read the output of lintian-info -t about
hardening-no-fortify-functions, and it helps a lot. The
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:19:43 +0200
marcel partap wrote:
> [
> > net effect of the above is more likely to be that the urgency will be
> > overriden on the britney side
> ... ?hmm? debian has a britney side? long blondish hair, well curved?
> niccce - *niie*--- :D
> *cough* freezes suck^^^ ]
>
On 2012-06-19 14:01, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:29 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 2012-06-19 13:59, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > > This implies that an "apt-get install library" needs to trigger that
> > > restart.
> > > Which means that apt-get needs to
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:29 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2012-06-19 13:59, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> > This implies that an "apt-get install library" needs to trigger that
> > restart.
> > Which means that apt-get needs to depend on restart-services. So either
> > restart-servic
Adam D. Barratt writes ("On the (ab)use of the Urgency field"):
> I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on
> it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of
> the Urgency field:
>
>* Urgency high to beat the freeze.
>
> As mentioned in the
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:55:42PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On 12-06-19 at 08:48am, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > I'm personally in favour of education because I assume that's where
> > users might seek first. I have no idea whather I'm right with this
> > assumption.
> >
> > BTW, did I
Hello,
On 2012-06-19 13:59, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> This implies that an "apt-get install library" needs to trigger that
> restart.
> Which means that apt-get needs to depend on restart-services. So either
> restart-services and checkrestart should go into the apt package, or apt
> needs
> to depe
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 23:47 +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:10:46 +0100, Ben Hutchings
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 20:40 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> >>
> >> > I want to announce restart-services here [1][2]. It
[
> net effect of the above is more likely to be that the urgency will be
> overriden on the britney side
... ?hmm? debian has a britney side? long blondish hair, well curved?
niccce - *niie*--- :D
*cough* freezes suck^^^ ]
#hacky day folks ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 12:23:45 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Tomas Pospisek writes:
>
>> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:10:46 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 20:40 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
> I want to announc
Hi,
I realise everyone's waiting for news of the freeze (we're working on
it...) but please bear in mind that this is not an appropriate use of
the Urgency field:
* Urgency high to beat the freeze.
As mentioned in the last mail we sent to d-d-a (and several at various
points before that)
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 04:14:52AM +0300, Serge wrote:
>> User cannot break the system filling /tmp on disk. But he can do that
>> if he fills /tmp on tmpfs. So /tmp on tmpfs adds one more point of
>> failure for servers.
>
> No, that's not true. The real danger in filli
Ben Hutchings writes:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:25:51PM +0100, Jamie White wrote:
>> Hiya
>>
>> Just a quick question, which malloc, is there anyway that this
>> function (used in C) could allocate memory into already allocated
>> memory, such as the stack - or code space!
>
> Assuming that
Tomas Pospisek writes:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:10:46 +0100, Ben Hutchings
> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 20:40 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
>>>
>>> > I want to announce restart-services here [1][2]. It's a script
>>> > that tries to rest
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:38:15PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:25:51PM +0100, Jamie White wrote:
> > Hiya
> >
> > Just a quick question, which malloc, is there anyway that this
> > function (used in C) could allocate memory into already allocated
> > memory, such as th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Cristau
* Package name: salome-{kernel,gui,med,geom,paravis,..}
Version : 6.5.0
Upstream Author : CEA, EDF R&D, Open CASCADE
* URL : http://www.salome-platform.org/
* License : mostly LGPL
Programming Lang: C++,
35 matches
Mail list logo
