On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Suexec's compiled-in document root would stay at /var/www so that it
> would include all vhost document roots. And dspam-webfrontend could
> keep its files in /var/www/dspam, inside suexec's document root,
> without polluting the default doc
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: sigrok-qt
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : sigrok developers
* URL : http://www.sigrok.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : Qt-based GUI for the sigrok logic analyze
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: sigrok-firmware
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : sigrok developers, others
* URL : http://www.sigrok.org
* License : GPL, BSD, others
Programming Lang: C, others
Description : firmware f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: sigrok-dumps
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : sigrok developers
* URL : http://www.sigrok.org
* License : Public domain
Programming Lang: N/A
Description : example logic analyzer protoco
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: sigrok-cli
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : sigrok developers
* URL : http://www.sigrok.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : command-line frontend for the sigrok logic
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: libsigrokdecode
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : sigrok developers
* URL : http://www.sigrok.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : sigrok protocol decoder libra
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: libsigrok
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : sigrok developers
* URL : http://www.sigrok.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : sigrok hardware driver library
libsigrok i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann
* Package name: sigrok-gtk
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : sigrok developers
* URL : http://www.sigrok.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : GTK+-based GUI for the sigrok logic analyz
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bernhard Reiter
* Package name: trelby
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Anil Gulecha
* URL : http://www.trelby.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : movie screenplay writing software
--
package wnpp
retitle 668841 ITP: yp-svipc -- System V IPC for Yorick/Python
thanks
Le 14/04/12 22:30, Roger Leigh a écrit :
> On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 10:16:53PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>> * Package name: svipc
>> * URL : https://github.com/frigaut/yorick-svipc/
>
> Given the
On Monday 16 April 2012, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> > /srv is solely the domain of the sysadmin, packages cannot rely
> > on any particular layout not specified by the sysadmin (via
> > debconf etc).
>
> I know. Is that a problem though?
> AFAIK
On Monday 16 April 2012, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
> >> I'd use ht instead of html. Not every ht file is a html file.
> >
> > I have no strong opinion on the actual name, as long as it is
> > another subdirectory. We could equally use /var/www/de
Good day,
An inquest by my bank (IFC) conducted on inactive/dormant account, revealed
that you are a potential beneficiary to an unclaimed sum
The similarity in your name and email (debian-devel@lists.debian.org) makes it
possible for us to liquidate the deceased account in your favour. Please
Hi,
On 16.04.2012 18:56, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> /srv is solely the domain of the sysadmin, packages cannot rely on any
>> particular layout not specified by the sysadmin (via debconf etc).
>
> I know. Is that a problem though?
> AFAIK pack
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
>> I'd use ht instead of html. Not every ht file is a html file.
>
> I have no strong opinion on the actual name, as long as it is another
> subdirectory. We could equally use /var/www/default, /var/www/htdocs or
> whatever we feel like.
What abou
Hi,
On 16.04.2012 18:59, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Defining a standard for vhosts would solve the problem without having
> to touch the normal doc root. Seems like a far simpler fix.
how would you do that? We can't control or enforce what directory people
pick for their virtual hosts. We do not
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> /srv is solely the domain of the sysadmin, packages cannot rely on any
> particular layout not specified by the sysadmin (via debconf etc).
I know. Is that a problem though?
AFAIK packages don't (and shouldn't) put any files into vhost dirs.
-
On 04/04/2012 05:35 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> Hi -devel (and -lsb),
>
> I have recently uploaded lsb-base 4.1+Debian0+fancy0 to experimental. As
> this version introduces a small change that has a big visual impact on
> the Debian boot, I would like to get some feedback on it before
> uploa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I would like to include the CA distribution of the IGTF
(www.igtf.net), which is an international collaboration of CAs for use
in the e-science communities (i.e. scientific grid computing & cloud
computing).
The certificates in this collection ar
On Mié 04 Abr 2012 06:35:49 Didier 'OdyX' Raboud escribió:
> Hi -devel (and -lsb),
>
> I have recently uploaded lsb-base 4.1+Debian0+fancy0 to experimental. As
> this version introduces a small change that has a big visual impact on
> the Debian boot, I would like to get some feedback on it before
20 matches
Mail list logo
