Okay, I've spent parts of another couple of days working on this using the
pkg-kde-tools infrastructure, and I think I can draw some more
conclusions.
First of all, for those who haven't explored the pkg-kde-tools
infrastructure for this, it looks like the effective process goes
something like thi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Clint Byrum
* Package name: python-mongokit
Version : 0.7.2
Upstream Author : Nicolas Clairon (Namlook)
* URL : http://namlook.github.com/mongokit/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : structu
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 17:20 -0430, Luis Alejandro Martínez Faneyth
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what was the package (or packages) where linux kernel
> modules that are not shipped with it (i.e. not included in the
> linux-image package) are packaged.
Various packages for different projects.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bekir Dogan
* Package name: simplelxc
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Bekir Dogan
* URL : https://github.com/bergerx/simplelxc#readme
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Shell script
Description : Minimalist packag
Ooops! Forgot the reference:
[1]http://wiki.debian.org/rtl819x
El 27/01/12 17:20, Luis Alejandro Martinez Faneyth escribio:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering what was the package (or packages) where linux kernel
> modules that are not shipped with it (i.e. not included in the
> linux-image package) are
Hi,
I was wondering what was the package (or packages) where linux kernel
modules that are not shipped with it (i.e. not included in the
linux-image package) are packaged.
For example, Realtek's rtl8192se module as pointed on the wiki [1], was
inserted on Linux 3.0.0~rc1-1~experimental.1. Previou
Sune Vuorela writes:
> On 2012-01-26, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> But that feels like a result contrary to what I had previously thought
>> was the intended direction, so I wanted to ask the Debian development
>> community as a whole: am I missing something? Are these symbols files
>> actually usefu
Leti video materiali ?!?
http://www.tracyevans.co.uk/izlaizi-caurumuz
Lesinska Ieva
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rqre3-0003de...@relay06.mail.e
>If "current" license is GPL and someone make a fork based on that your
>license change in the future will not have an impact on the fork.
>A "release" has no value when regarding what license the work is
>available as.
OK, I've left it as GPL. I've also added an archive with the sound and music
On 01/27/2012 12:54 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On 2012-01-26 02:45, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> On 01/25/2012 01:24 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs file
Hi,
I noticed that we now have long descriptions somewhere else, however I
somehow missed the consequence, that UDD now does not feature the
English long descriptions as well.
I have written the UDD importer for DDTP descriptions and noticed
that the location where I was drawing the dscriptions f
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: libpal-java
Version : 1.5.1
Upstream Author : Matthew Goode
* URL : http://www.cebl.auckland.ac.nz/pal-project/
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Phylogenetic
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 11:49:06PM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2012-01-26, Thomas Weber wrote:
> > I'm currently creating symbol files for Octave in Debian. And quite
> > frankly, the way symbol files for C++ libraries are handled and
> > (especially) documented is totally frustrating.
> >
> >
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:46:07AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> While I agree that forking upstream is not necessarily the right thing
> to do, allow me to ask some things just so I understand things
> better...
>
> Do I understand you correctly that an empty configuration file in /etc
> wil
On 2012-01-26 02:45, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Luk Claes wrote:
>> On 01/25/2012 01:24 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>>
>>> We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
>>> they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
>>> found in th
Package: wnpp
Owner: Youhei SASAKI
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: ruby-method-source
Version : 0.7.0
Upstream Author : John Mair
* URL or Web page : https://github.com/banister/method_source
* License : Expat
Description : Retrieve the sourcecode for a method
T
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Timo Aaltonen
* Package name: libmozilla-ldap-perl
Version : 1.5.3
Upstream Author : The Mozilla Project
* URL : http://www.mozilla.org/directory/perldap.html
* License : GPL-2+, LGPL-2+, MPL-1.1
Programming Lang: Perl
Sorry for picking up this old thread, but...
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 01:38:56AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 31, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Note that Steve's point, namely that he (if I'm reading him right) thinks
> > that the upstream changes are being overstated and that upstream's
> > dire
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: phy-spread
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Filip Bielejec
* URL : http://www.kuleuven.be/aidslab/phylogeography/SPREAD.html
* License : LGPL-3+
Programming Lang: Java
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andreas Tille
* Package name: libkmlframework-java
Version : 0.0.20090718
Upstream Author : Eivind Bøhn
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/kmlframework/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description : library/
20 matches
Mail list logo
