Re: ecofont

On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:52 AM, 810d4rk wrote: > Hi, may I ask if it is possible to include ecofont > (www.ecofont.com/assets/files/ecofont_vera_sans_regular.zip) in > debian? There was a thread about this back in 2008: https://lists.debian.org/debian-publicity/2008/12/threads.html#00021 My per

Red Hat is moving from / to /usr/

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/hotplug/udev.git;a=commitdiff;h=12a362be5c1982f80dbfb75bda070208a2c99cdf Discuss. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: 486 still being sold NEW / was Re: Increasing minimum 'i386' processor

On 11/21/2011 07:52 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Since we're theorising, rather than talking about actual users, my > theory is that these are sold as replacements for installed systems, > which will run the exact same software as the original - not Debian > 7.0. It would be silly to start a new dep

Re: ecofont

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 09:52:57PM +, 810d4rk wrote: > Hi, may I ask if it is possible to include ecofont > (www.ecofont.com/assets/files/ecofont_vera_sans_regular.zip) in > debian? Well, is this font freely licensed? The zip file only contains a ttf font file, with no accompanying informatio

Re: ecofont

Dear "810d4rk", 810d4rk schrieb am 06.12.2011 22:52: > Hi, may I ask if it is possible to include ecofont > (www.ecofont.com/assets/files/ecofont_vera_sans_regular.zip) in > debian? assuming (I haven't checked that), that the font satisfies the DFSG [0], you can either package the font yourself an

ecofont

Hi, may I ask if it is possible to include ecofont (www.ecofont.com/assets/files/ecofont_vera_sans_regular.zip) in debian? -- Thanks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://

Re: New sections

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:17:24PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > Where would you like to see the metapackages of the Debian Edu Blend? > > hehe :) :-) > but seriously: when I read that mail from Jörg I wondered whether to react at > all: why move the Debian Edu packages into the education (o

Bug#651217: ITP: nml -- NewGRF Meta Language compiler

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Matthijs Kooijman * Package name: nml Version : 0.2.0 Upstream Author : Various authors * URL : http://dev.openttdcoop.org/projects/nml * License : GPLv2+ Programming Lang: Python Description : newgrf meta languag

debdelta forensic

dear all, I just uploaded 'debdelta' version 0.45, that has a better implementation of error logs , and a provision for (automatically) sending them to the main server (where I will be able to look at them) . Brief explanation. A 'forensic file' is a file listing the content of a Debian package ,

Re: dpkg-buildpackage and new "-indep" debhelper options

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 05:53:55PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > Hi all, > > I have an eigen3 package, which uses --before option to escape > DOC-building on all platforms. > debian/rules is looking so now: > > > binary-indep: > dh $@ --buildsystem=cmake

dpkg-buildpackage and new "-indep" debhelper options

Hi all, I have an eigen3 package, which uses --before option to escape DOC-building on all platforms. debian/rules is looking so now: binary-indep: dh $@ --buildsystem=cmake --builddirectory=$(BUILDDIR) --before dh_auto_build cd $(BUILDDIR); $

Re: Archive upload tools

On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:04:01 + Jon Dowland wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 01:56:51PM +, Neil Williams wrote: > > Thanks to Adam Barratt for clarifying the original question on IRC. > > Care to share? ☺ I did refer to the two bugs involved, but you snipped that bit: #647129 and #647130

Re: New sections

Hi, On Dienstag, 6. Dezember 2011, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:46:58PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > education, which is for education related tools that don't fit better > > metapackages, which is for metapackages so that apt can do special > Where would you like to see th

Re: Archive upload tools

On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 01:56:51PM +, Neil Williams wrote: > It wasn't meant to be hostile - the original query was unclear and > seemed, to me, to be proposing adding yet another new upload tool / > complaining about the existing tools in a rather nebulous manner, I actually read it entirely

Re: Archive upload tools

On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:41:41 + Jon Dowland wrote: > The essence of your (rather hostile) response is "I don't know", so why bother > replying? It wasn't meant to be hostile - the original query was unclear and seemed, to me, to be proposing adding yet another new upload tool / complaining abo

Re: 2.6+ kernel make-tag problem

The lack of any contextual quoting, plus the changed subject, have made it very difficult to relate your message to the one you are replying to (for someone not intimately familiar with the thread). On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 09:49:54AM -0500, John D. Hendrickson and Sara Darnell wrote: > #3 None of

Re: Archive upload tools

The essence of your (rather hostile) response is "I don't know", so why bother replying? -- Jon Dowland -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2011120613414

Bug#651159: ITP: dbusada -- Ada bindings to the D-Bus message bus

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Reto Buerki -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: dbusada Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Reto Buerki * URL : http://www.codelabs.ch/dbus-ada/ * License : GMGPL Programming Lang: Ada Descript

Bug#651154: ITP: lv2-extensions-bad -- LV2 extensions from the "bad" set

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Alessio Treglia * Package name: lv2-extensions-bad Version : 0~20111206 Upstream Author : David Robillard * URL : http://lv2plug.in/ns/ * License : Expat Programming Lang: C Description : LV2 extensions from the

Re: New sections

On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 01:46:58PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > education, which is for education related tools that don't fit better >into any other section > > metapackages, which is for metapackages so that apt can do special > handling on them. Where would you like

Re: New sections and frontend behaviour [Was: Re: New sections]

On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:27:34AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > There's also the problem that if a meta package removes a dependency > in a later version, that package will still stay of the system with > the current implementation. Is this really a problem? It could be perfectly OK to sim

Re: New sections and frontend behaviour [Was: Re: New sections]

Le dimanche 04 décembre 2011 à 23:47 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : > The reasoning being that both metapackages and transitional packages > should have their dependencies marked as non-automatic so they don't get > removed when the top package is removed. > > I think mixing the two types

Re: Bug#651093: ITP: libyui -- Qt, GTK+ and ncurses UI-Engine

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 So how shall I name it then? Any suggestions? BR, Björn Esser Am 06.12.2011 09:06, schrieb Russ Allbery: > Miles Bader writes: > >> "libyastui" would seem sort of misleading -- from the >> description, it sounds like libyui isn't part of yast,

Re: Archive upload tools

On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:11:48 +0100 Florian Weimer wrote: > Are there any other archive upload tools besides dput and dupload? Why? Isn't two enough? If one or both aren't working for your setup, write a patch and file a bug. > (Not counting generic file transfer clients.) Any number of script

Re: Bug#651093: ITP: libyui -- Qt, GTK+ and ncurses UI-Engine

Miles Bader writes: > "libyastui" would seem sort of misleading -- from the description, it > sounds like libyui isn't part of yast, but rather an independent > library upon which yast depends. > Also, there isn't actually a "libyui-js" package... It's libjs-yui instead. -- Russ Allbery (r...