Joerg Jaspert writes:
> metapackages, which is for metapackages so that apt can do special
> handling on them.
Should this section also get transitional packages, or should those stay
in oldlibs? I'm guessing the latter, but they're technically also
metapackages.
--
Russ Allbery
Joerg Jaspert writes:
> metapackages, which is for metapackages so that apt can do special
> handling on them.
On IRC Joerg mentioned that transitional packages could/should also go
to the metapackages section.
The reasoning being that both metapackages and transitional packages
s
Wolodja Wentland writes:
> Hello,
>
> we are seeing an increasing number of users in #debian-next asking about FTBFS
> bugs that are reported by apt-listbugs during upgrades. Most of those users
> are not familiar with acronyms such as FTBFS or if these bugs apply to their
> setup.
>
> The underl
Am 04.12.2011 19:41, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> Source: r8168
> Severity: serious
>
> (x-debbugs-cc to pmatthaei and debian-release)
>
> Hi,
Hey, thanks for submitting!
>
> I've been blocking this package from entering testing, but as Patrick
> Matthäi questions that choice I'm filing this bug
Thats note a spam she want give a donation.
Le 3 déc. 2011 22:04, "Andreas Moog" a écrit :
> On 12/03/2011 09:52 PM, Daniel Martí wrote:
> > Scam in french, asking for money. Is there any way to avoid spam in this
> > list?
>
> For starters, by not including a fullquote of the SPAM. Then by
> fo
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 12:38:35 +, Ian Campbell
wrote:
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 19:35 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
On 2011-12-03, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:58:55 + (UTC), Philipp Kern
> wrote:
>>On 2011-12-02, Marc Haber wrote:
>>> I also support this and think it is a really
Hi
following the 3 bugs I close with this mail I just created new sections
in our 3 archives. That is,
introspection, which is for "GObject introspection data" (or whatever
other subsystem is doing something similar to it in the
future)
education, which is for educa
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 19:35 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 2011-12-03, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:58:55 + (UTC), Philipp Kern
> > wrote:
> >>On 2011-12-02, Marc Haber wrote:
> >>> I also support this and think it is a really good idea. But please
> >>> keep x.y.z-1 around an
8 matches
Mail list logo