On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:17:54 +, Wookey wrote:
> I know almost nothing about mingw* use and variants, but it does strike
> me that it just another cross-compiler, and choices about package
> names and triplets should be at least influenced by what we do for all
> the other cross-toolchains, mul
peter green wrote:
[...]
> This leads to the building of
> uninstallable packages which in turn leads to problems with testing
> transition of packages.
>
> Currently there are two workarounds for this situation
>
> 1: manually alter the package's architecture list to limit building to those
> arc
Some packages have runtime dependencies on packages that they do not
have corresponding build-dependencies for. This leads to the building of
uninstallable packages which in turn leads to problems with testing
transition of packages.
Currently there are two workarounds for this situation
1: m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
* Package name: openerp6
Version : 6.0.3
Upstream Author : OpenERP S.A
* URL : http://www.openerp.com/
* License : AGPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Enterprise Resource Management
Open
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:04:31AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> > > > - Conditional application of patches. Some packages have patches
>> > > > that are
>> > > > only applied on a per-architecture or per-target-distribution basis.
>
>> > > All of these can be dealt w
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:04:31AM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > > - Conditional application of patches. Some packages have patches that
> > > > are
> > > > only applied on a per-architecture or per-target-distribution basis.
> > > All of these can be dealt with by rewriting the patch so th
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:08:11PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> * Package name: pianobooster
> Version : 0.6.4
> Upstream Author : Louis J. Barman
> * URL : http://pianobooster.sourceforge.net/
> * License : GPL3+
> Programming Lang: C++
> Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miriam Ruiz
* Package name: pianobooster
Version : 0.6.4
Upstream Author : Louis J. Barman
* URL : http://pianobooster.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL3+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : a new way to learn th
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:22:56PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 02:56 AM, Svante Signell wrote:
> > As many people (including me) are very disappointed in gnome3, switching
> > from a very configurable desktop environment in gnome2 to a almost not
> > configurable tablet one, is the
+++ Ron [2011-11-14 03:03 +1030]:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:17:43AM +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > I thought it better to follow the MinGW-w64 project's recommendations,
> > including using their triplets.
>
> > I'll try a build with the old triplets to see how that goes, and to figure
> > out
Hello, sir
thank you very much for your time
Here is our price list for scooter 139qmb , baotian scooter , engine parts
and tuning and racing parts
thank you
Mr.dave
www.gy6performance.com
<>
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Gergely Nagy wrote:
>> > - Custom patch commands, as already discussed. Yes, we should get rid of
>> >them, but that doesn't make it easy to convert them.
>>
>> echo skip-patches >>debian/source/options
>>
>> And then in a pre-build target, d
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:08:39AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Roger Leigh [2011-11-29 10:04]:
>
> (...)
> > > > > - Conditional application of patches. Some packages have patches
> > > > > that are
> > > > > only applied on a per-architecture or per-target-distribution basis.
>
> (..
On Tue, 29 Nov 2011, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > - Custom patch commands, as already discussed. Yes, we should get rid of
> >them, but that doesn't make it easy to convert them.
>
> echo skip-patches >>debian/source/options
>
> And then in a pre-build target, do the scripting magic, and call dh
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:56:45AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Paul Wise [2011-11-29 03:33]:
> > All of these can be dealt with by rewriting the patch so that it is
> > acceptable to upstream and applied and released by them.
>
> Care to explain how conditional per-target-distribution patch
Martin Wuertele writes:
> * Roger Leigh [2011-11-29 10:04]:
>
> (...)
>> > > > - Conditional application of patches. Some packages have patches
>> > > > that are
>> > > > only applied on a per-architecture or per-target-distribution basis.
>
> (...)
>
>> > > All of these can be dealt with b
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 646622 apt-listchanges: please parse upstream changelog, too (perhaps
> with packages' help)
Bug #646622 [general] debian-maintainers: Changelog for new upstream release
should include summary of upstream changelog
Changed Bug title to '
retitle 646622 apt-listchanges: please parse upstream changelog, too (perhaps
with packages' help)
reassign 646622 apt-listchanges 2.85.8
quit
Hi,
Nemo Inis wrote:
> I have a suggestion from an end-user point of view:
>
> All too often when checking incoming updates (in Synaptic or other tools)
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 06:44:04PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Besides it would be great that everyone uploading has a big reminder to
>> switch away from dpatch. Switching to v3 quilt should be easy.
>
> There are several features of dpatch that can't be trivially migrate
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:22:56PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> While I've read so many complain about the non-customizable aspects of
> Gnome 3, I've seen very few people highlighting how fast gnome-shell is
> in version 3 compared to version 2.
In my case that's because it doesn't match my exp
Alexander Wirt writes:
> The question is: who decides? I have a bunch of packages and an established
> workflow that served me well over the last years. I don't want to learn
> another *censored* system, just because someone said its the new standard or
> it is better.
Thing is, 3.0 (quilt) is a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: Stéphane Glondu , debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: nss-passwords
Upstream Author : Stéphane Glondu
* URL : https://gitorious.org/nss-passwords
* License : MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: Ocaml & C
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> Care to explain how conditional per-target-distribution patches should
> be bushed upstream? Think of patches requried for debian/sid,
> debian/squeeze-backports, ubuntu/Oneric Ocelot and ubuntu/Lucid Lynx
> when it comes to build dependenc
* Roger Leigh [2011-11-29 10:04]:
(...)
> > > > - Conditional application of patches. Some packages have patches that
> > > > are
> > > > only applied on a per-architecture or per-target-distribution basis.
(...)
> > > All of these can be dealt with by rewriting the patch so that it is
> >
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 09:56:45AM +0100, Martin Wuertele wrote:
> * Paul Wise [2011-11-29 03:33]:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >
> > > - Custom patch commands, as already discussed. Yes, we should get rid of
> > > them, but that doesn't make it easy to conv
* Paul Wise [2011-11-29 03:33]:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:04 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > - Custom patch commands, as already discussed. Yes, we should get rid of
> > them, but that doesn't make it easy to convert them.
> >
> > - Conditional application of patches. Some packages have
26 matches
Mail list logo
