On 11-11-08 at 02:34pm, Patrick Ouellette wrote:
> Where is the voice of the nodejs maintainers in this?
For my own part, I am following the thread, quite happy to hear the
voice of the (ham) node maintainers, but wondering what is so precious
about keeping the name of its binary.
Form my under
[Iustin Pop]
> Could/should Debian make it easier for each package to have an own email
> list (i.e. making it easier to have "1-person team maintenance")?
We have {pkg}@packages.debian.org and {srcpkg}@packages.qa.debian.org.
I don't know if mail to these aliases get archived, but at least it is
Hi,
In my humble experience I just used debian/shlibs.local :-)
05.11.2011 01:30, Daniel Ruoso пишет:
I have been thinking about the bootstrapping of pakages lately. I am
involved in bootstrapping a partial system -- no kernel and no libc --
for some architectures for internal use. And I just t
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 03:48:35PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> - I've made the "private email aliases considered harmful" point [10],
> in a somehow unrelated thread. I ask you to watch out for interactions
> in Debian that could happen only through private email addresses.
> There are
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 09:50:27PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 06:34 +0900, Iustin Pop wrote:
> > Not sure where else to send this… but while checking for a small upload
> > I did I saw some very old files on incoming. If you check sorted by
> > date, http://incoming.debia
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 06:34 +0900, Iustin Pop wrote:
> Not sure where else to send this… but while checking for a small upload
> I did I saw some very old files on incoming. If you check sorted by
> date, http://incoming.debian.org/?C=M;O=A, you'll see some very old
> things (1997, 2003, 2007, etc…
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 09:57:02PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Since this discussion in 2005:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg01085.html
> binutils has got a shlibs file that specifies a tight dependency on the
> current upstream version. Thus frequent binNMUs of any packag
Hi all,
Not sure where else to send this… but while checking for a small upload
I did I saw some very old files on incoming. If you check sorted by
date, http://incoming.debian.org/?C=M;O=A, you'll see some very old
things (1997, 2003, 2007, etc…).
Their size is not big, but seems… unclean to not
Since this discussion in 2005:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg01085.html
binutils has got a shlibs file that specifies a tight dependency on the
current upstream version. Thus frequent binNMUs of any packages linking
dynamically against libbfd or libopcodes are needed, or those
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 07:16:35AM +1100, Damien Gardner Jnr wrote:
>
> I have to pop my head up from my lurker-hole here, and say that I'm a more
> than a little confused, why a 15 year old application should change its name
> at all? Even the Node.js wiki makes it clear that the application s
Where is the voice of the nodejs maintainers in this? They are
listed as:
Debian Javascript Maintainers
Jérémy Lal
Dave Beckett
Jonas Smedegaard
--
Patrick Ouellette p...@flying-gecko.net
ne4po (at) arrl (dot) net Amateur Radio: NE4PO
What kind of change have you b
Hello,
I welcome this change as it will also bring benefits in the local processing
speed (at least, for some tools).
As for Cupt, a couple of simple patches is needed for the support of
the grabbing new 'Description-md5' from Packages-files, but even
without them the program should work correctl
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> If it's 100% python, that's great, but due to its past, and the
> fact that its heavy image processing most likely requires the
> use of non-python code for speed, I just wanted to check exactly
> how free it is nowadays.
I have never used the
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 09:37:24AM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> * Package name: cellprofiler
> Upstream Author : Broad Institute
Last time I used it, Cell Profiler required a Matlab runtime which
included not only the proprietary Matlab libraries, but also an
entire Linux distribution i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Björn Esser"
* Package name: jailkit
Version : 2.1.4
Upstream Author : Olivier Sessink
* URL : http://olivier.sessink.nl/jailkit/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C, Python
Description : chroot jail utilities
Hi Mathieu,
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:28 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Programming Lang: Java
This should probably be "Clojure" and not "Java" :)
--
Wolodja
4096R/CAF14EFC
081C B7CD FF04 2BA9 94EA 36B2 8B7F 7D30 CAF1 4EFC
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:28 +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
> * Package name: local-file
> Version : 0.1.0
> Upstream Author : Arthur Edelstein
> * URL : https://github.com/arthuredelstein/local-file/
> * License :
> Programming Lang: Java
> Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: local-file
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Arthur Edelstein
* URL : https://github.com/arthuredelstein/local-file/
* License :
Programming Lang: Java
Description : small cloju
Marvin Renich writes:
> How is /usr/libexec/ better than /usr/lib/ in these
> cases?
Placing executables in /usr/lib/package is just messy, if it contains,
for instance, libraries. Having binaries in /usr/lib//bin, as
inn2 does, is a bit better at least.
--
Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
--
To UNS
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Vincent Sanders
* Package name: png23d
Version : 1.10
Upstream Author : Name
* URL : http://kyllikki.github.com/png23d/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Description : Converts PNG images into three dimensional
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mathieu Malaterre
* Package name: cellprofiler
Version : 2.0
Upstream Author : Broad Institute
* URL : http://www.cellprofiler.org
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : quantitatively measure phe
21 matches
Mail list logo
