On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 05:50:29PM +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:27:01PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> > On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:34:41 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > I disagree with "let's first remove things". If a package like ruby
> > > doesn't build on sparc thi
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 03:33:06PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:34:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> >
> > > - Being able to judge whether the maintainers have done their part in
> > > reaching out to porters is a requisite for the above. And to do so, we
> > > reall
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:27:01PM +, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:34:41 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I disagree with "let's first remove things". If a package like ruby
> > doesn't build on sparc this bug report is RC exactly as long as sparc is
> > a release arch. The rel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrzej Bieniek
* Package name: gst-debug-viewer
Version : Not released yet
Upstream Author : René Stadler
* URL : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~cymacs/gst-debug-viewer/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descr
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:34:41PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > - Being able to judge whether the maintainers have done their part in
> > reaching out to porters is a requisite for the above. And to do so, we
> > really need more visibility of those exchanges. According to devref
> > [1
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 19:34:41 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Stefano Zacchiroli (z...@debian.org) [110908 19:22]:
>> Hopefully, not having $pkg on $arch would raise the visibility of the
>> issue and attract attention to fix the issue. In the meantime, the
>> fact that $pkg is not on $arch
6 matches
Mail list logo
