Re: /usr/share/doc/ files and gzip/xz/no compression

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:43:04AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Iustin Pop wrote: > > There is also information on Wikipedia about various compression > > benchmarks, but IMHO if we want to switch from gzip then bzip2 > > doesn't make sense for /usr/share/doc. > > I'd like t

Bug#638230: ITP: elki -- ELKI Data mining algorithm development framework

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Erich Schubert * Package name: elki Version : 0.4.0~beta1 Upstream Author : ELKI Development Team * URL : http://elki.dbs.ifi.lmu.de/ * License : AGPLv3+ Programming Lang: Java Description : ELKI Data mining algo

Re: RFC: dpatch - past, present and future

On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:10:06PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote: > Sandro Tosi writes: > > there's already: /usr/share/doc/quilt/examples/dpatch2quilt.sh > > Well then, that just makes it all the easier! I'll take a look, and see > if there are any cases that script can't handle. You amy want to ch

Re: RFC: dpatch - past, present and future

Guillem Jover writes: >> But if your goal is really to get rid of it, you could just as well file >> wishlist bugs on all packages build-depending on it, usertag them and >> increase their severity slowly. Wishlist for now, normal in the next >> release cycle and important/RC in the cycle where y

Re: RFC: dpatch - past, present and future

Hi! On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 22:33:55 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Gergely Nagy wrote: > > As for the future: I still believe dpatch is a temporary solution, and > > that better tools exist now. Therefore, it is my long-term plan to > > slowly deprecate dpatch, and eventually

Re: RFC: dpatch - past, present and future

Stefano Zacchiroli writes: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:54:30PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote: >> I don't want to make it spew out deprecation warnings, those are too >> tempting to ignore. Updating the description, filing wishlist bugs with >> patches, and providing upgrade paths for the most common

Re: mentors.debian.net runs the debexpo code now

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Aug 17, 2011, at 12:14, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 07:03:03AM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote: >> Thanks to huge work by Johnny Lamb, Christoph Haas, Jan Dittberner, >> Kalle Söderman, Serafeim Zanikolas, David Paleino, and Pa

Bug#638182: less: please be more verbose about lesspipe usage in login script

Package: less Version: 444-1 Severity: wishlist Hi there! The discussion started on the debian-devel@ mailing list: On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:38:43 +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 11:50:49AM +0200, Luca Ca

Re: Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form

On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:18:09 +0800, Liang Guo wrote: On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Shell Xu wrote: And, I almost finish my job. But which bugnumber should I fill into changelog? The new one or both? Thanks for help. You can close both bug in debian/changelog You can, but you'll just gene

Re: Links to the sources for services (was Re: mentors.debian.net runs the debexpo code now)

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:32:55AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > > >As a minor nitpick, can you add to the footer a link to the code? > > > >Many Debian services could benefit from more prominent footer links to > >the code, to encourage "patches are welcome" habits a

Re: Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form

Hi there! On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 11:52:47 +0200, Arnaud Fontaine wrote: >> Sorry to bother you, but my merge has failed, and I don't know why. I >> retitled this >> bug(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 ) and make >> mys

Links to the sources for services (was Re: mentors.debian.net runs the debexpo code now)

Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > >As a minor nitpick, can you add to the footer a link to the code? > >Many Debian services could benefit from more prominent footer links to >the code, to encourage "patches are welcome" habits and to make it clear >that the code for all our services is available. (yes,

Re: mentors.debian.net runs the debexpo code now

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Stefano, On 17.08.2011 12:14, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > As a minor nitpick, can you add to the footer a link to the code? thanks for the hint. We completely forgot about it, indeed. I've added[1] the link to the templates and it will appear on t

Re: Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form

On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Shell Xu wrote: > Sorry to bother you, but my merge has failed, and I don't know why. > I retitled this > bug(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 ) and make > myself as owner, but merge 526936 637892 has failed. > According this article(http://w

Re: mentors.debian.net runs the debexpo code now

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 07:03:03AM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote: > Thanks to huge work by Johnny Lamb, Christoph Haas, Jan Dittberner, > Kalle Söderman, Serafeim Zanikolas, David Paleino, and Paul Wise, we > have had a alpha-level product called Debexpo that can replace > mentors.debian.net as the p

Re: Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form

Hi, > Sorry to bother you, but my merge has failed, and I don't know why. I > retitled this > bug(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 ) and make > myself as owner, but merge 526936 637892 has failed. No problem at all

Re: Bug#637892: ITP: python-formalchemy -- auto-generation and customizable form

Sorry to bother you, but my merge has failed, and I don't know why. I retitled this bug(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526936 ) and make myself as owner, but merge 526936 637892 has failed. According this article(http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#merge ), bugs which I try