Re: distinguish between "core" and "main"?

2011-06-03 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/04/11 07:56, Paul Wise wrote: > Sounds like you are looking for backports.debian.org? > Backports for Squeeze contains just about 400 package, AFIACS. Regards Harri -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Us

Re: [fedora-arm] Does anyone care about LSB on arm?

2011-06-03 Thread Jon Masters
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:25 +0100, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > sooo... although the situation *right now* is that nobody in the > commercial world is the slightest bit interested in LSB because they > all do "custom builds" of complete software stacks, it could be said > that *if* the f

Re: distinguish between "core" and "main"?

2011-06-03 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Sat, June 4, 2011 07:45, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Having 3+ packages within a single "main" repository is > pretty bulky. Would it be possible to distinguish between > the "core" Debian and "main" somehow? > > I don't want to keep anybody out. I just would like to use > the core packages of De

Re: distinguish between "core" and "main"?

2011-06-03 Thread Paul Wise
Sounds like you are looking for backports.debian.org? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTinAFUyM1LU

distinguish between "core" and "main"?

2011-06-03 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, Having 3+ packages within a single "main" repository is pretty bulky. Would it be possible to distinguish between the "core" Debian and "main" somehow? I don't want to keep anybody out. I just would like to use the core packages of Debi

Re: Uploading to multiple distros

2011-06-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 05:55:18PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Peter Samuelson writes ("Re: Uploading to multiple distros"): > > Since syncs from Debian are actually supposed to be the majority of > > packages in Ubuntu anyway, why not just do that - a real sync, not a > > fake simultaneous one. [

Re: Semantic change for dpkg triggers?

2011-06-03 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 01:21:40PM -0400, Phillip Susi wrote: > On 6/2/2011 8:33 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > >In general, the reason for this rule about satisfying dependencies is > >that a triggering package may well not be functional at all until the > >trigger is run. For example, if the triggerin

Re: Semantic change for dpkg triggers?

2011-06-03 Thread Phillip Susi
On 6/2/2011 8:33 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: In general, the reason for this rule about satisfying dependencies is that a triggering package may well not be functional at all until the trigger is run. For example, if the triggering package T needs to be registered with the interested package I, a pac

Re: Uploading to multiple distros

2011-06-03 Thread Ian Jackson
Matt Zimmerman writes ("Re: Uploading to multiple distros"): > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 01:54:37PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > And if the package is not accepted into the Debian archive for any reason, > > the changelog is very misleading because it looks like a sync from Debian. > > True, but pe

Re: Uploading to multiple distros

2011-06-03 Thread Ian Jackson
Peter Samuelson writes ("Re: Uploading to multiple distros"): > Since syncs from Debian are actually supposed to be the majority of > packages in Ubuntu anyway, why not just do that - a real sync, not a > fake simultaneous one. [...] Because that means that the Ubuntu developer needs to wait for

Re: Uploading to multiple distros

2011-06-03 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 06:17:09PM -0700, Evan Broder wrote: > Hmm...a lot of this discussion seems to be getting caught up in the > ubuntu-devel moderation queue, but I'll try to guess context as best > as I can... The moderation queue doesn't have any outstanding messages for this thread, though

Bug#629083: ITP: sezpoz -- Lightweight library for modular service lookups

2011-06-03 Thread James Page
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page * Package name: sezpoz Version : 1.9 Upstream Author : Jesse Glick * URL : http://sezpoz.java.net/ * License : CDDL or GPL-2 with Classpath exception Programming Lang: Java Description : Lightweight l

Re: Has dak gone fishing ?

2011-06-03 Thread Vincent Fourmond
On 03/06/11 12:55, Torsten Werner wrote: > Hi, > > Am 03.06.2011 11:17, schrieb Vincent Fourmond: >> Is there a problem with dak ? I've uploaded a package about 12 hours >> ago, with no acknowledgment so far. I can't help noticing too that >> debian-devel-changes hasn't seen any activity since y

Re: Has dak gone fishing ?

2011-06-03 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, Am 03.06.2011 11:17, schrieb Vincent Fourmond: > Is there a problem with dak ? I've uploaded a package about 12 hours > ago, with no acknowledgment so far. I can't help noticing too that > debian-devel-changes hasn't seen any activity since yesterday lunch time. some haskell upload stopped

Bug#629073: ITP: akuma -- Embeddable daemonization library for Java

2011-06-03 Thread James Page
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: James Page * Package name: akuma Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Kohsuke Kawaguchi * URL : http://java.net/projects/akuma * License : MIT Programming Lang: Java Description : Embeddable daemonization library for

Has dak gone fishing ?

2011-06-03 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Hello, Is there a problem with dak ? I've uploaded a package about 12 hours ago, with no acknowledgment so far. I can't help noticing too that debian-devel-changes hasn't seen any activity since yesterday lunch time. Or am I being simply way too impatient ;-) ? Cheers, Vincent

Re: Anonymous read-only access and Vcs-* [Re: Alioth status update, take 3]

2011-06-03 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 05/26/2011 07:54 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Scott Kitterman > > | Was there some discussion of this with Alioth users before it got > | changed? > > No. > > And while I apologise for the problems we've had with the migration, I'd > like to ask people to just accept some of the changes w

Re: Bug#628953: O: mercurial-buildpackage -- Utillities for maintaining a deb package in Hg repository

2011-06-03 Thread Andrew O. Shadoura
Hello, On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:11:19 +0200 Jens Peter Secher wrote: > Native package written by yours truly. Pristine-tar part does not > work anymore, reason unknown. Everything is written in haXe, which > entails some problems wrt. Process control & input/output, and I have > created a branch

Re: Alioth status update, take 3

2011-06-03 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi José, hi Roland, On Fr 03 Jun 2011 09:52:08 CEST "José L. Redrejo Rodríguez" wrote: 2. I then tried to checkout a new working copy via svn+ssh, which also fails: mike@minobo:~/MyDocuments/4projects$ svn co -q svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/debian-edu/trunk/src debian-edu svn: To better debug

Re: Alioth status update, take 3

2011-06-03 Thread L. Redrejo
El vie, 03-06-2011 a las 09:49 +0200, Mike Gabriel escribió: > Hi Roland, > Cc:ing this mail to debian-devel and debian-edu ML > > first of all: Thanks for all the efforts you spend on maintaining (and > lately upgrading) Alioth!!! > > And... > > ...in Hamburg and Trondheim there will be two D

Re: Alioth status update, take 3

2011-06-03 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Roland, Cc:ing this mail to debian-devel and debian-edu ML first of all: Thanks for all the efforts you spend on maintaining (and lately upgrading) Alioth!!! And... ...in Hamburg and Trondheim there will be two DebianEdu developer gatherings this weekend. However, (for me) there seems t