Soy usuario de Google Talk y he pensado que quizás te gustaría
probarlo. Podemos utilizarlo para llamarnos de forma gratuita a través
de Internet. Te envío una invitación para que te descargues Google
Talk. ¡Pruébalo!
---
Liliana
Hello,
Am trying to compile Heimdal in unstable without -O2 optimization, so I can
debug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=618992
To do this, I have inserted the line in debian/rules:
CFLAGS := "-g"
Unfortunately, when ever I do, I get the following error:
/bin/bash ../libtool -
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:26:10AM -0700, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
> It's not entirely accurate. The point of those lines are to ensure that
> older (certainly lenny and earlier, I'm not sure when the default
> changed) versions of GnuPG don't use SHA1 when signing keys (either your
> own or others
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 21:19, David Paleino wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 22:14:31 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
>
>> On 2011-04-07 18:15, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > Dpkg::Post-Invoke would be the right (best available) one. That would
>> > call your trigger after every dpkg invocation [..
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hi,
I'm orphaning the package hyperlatex. It's unmaintained upstream for years now
and it depends on an old emacs version (for emacs lisp in which it is
implemented). Therefore, it is RC-buggy now. I'm not a lisp programmer so I
won't port it to current emacs23.
T
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 18:00:09 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> - On the other hand, a wide open front of the discussion is *when* to
> freeze, with various people arguing in favor of having a specific
> period, such as "we freeze on $month every even/odd year".
Count me in.
> - ... what to
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> On 2011-04-07 18:15, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Dpkg::Post-Invoke would be the right (best available) one. That would
> > call your trigger after every dpkg invocation [...]
>
> This is not true, 'Dpkg::*-Invoke' script chain are called once
>
On 2011-04-07 21:19, David Paleino wrote:
> > This is not true, 'Dpkg::*-Invoke' script chain are called once
> > before/after all dpkg invocations.
>
> So it's just like a trigger monitoring /? (without the implications of
> triggers
> in terms of sequence of operations)
No, I phrased it badly
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 22:14:31 +0300, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> On 2011-04-07 18:15, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Dpkg::Post-Invoke would be the right (best available) one. That would
> > call your trigger after every dpkg invocation [...]
>
> This is not true, 'Dpkg::*-Invoke' script chain ar
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011, David Paleino wrote:
> "Only" those installing executables in these directories:
I know, I do not have stats but I expect this to be a very important
percentage of packages.
> Unfortunately, I have to remove and re-create all the symlinks upon trigger
> activation: in fact, o
On 2011-04-07 18:15, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Dpkg::Post-Invoke would be the right (best available) one. That would
> call your trigger after every dpkg invocation [...]
This is not true, 'Dpkg::*-Invoke' script chain are called once
before/after all dpkg invocations.
> But those hooks would
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 19:13:43 +0200
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Forgot to add, the current version of the script is here:
http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/la-file-bugs.pl.txt
(simply because it was convenient for me to work on the script from
more than one machine)
I've not updated that with the ver
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 19:13:43 +0200
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2011-04-06 codeh...@debian.org wrote:
> > Package: ggz-grubby
> > Severity: normal
> > User: codeh...@debian.org
> > Usertags: la-file-removal
>
> > To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
> > 10.2 and to eas
On 2011-04-06 codeh...@debian.org wrote:
> Package: ggz-grubby
> Severity: normal
> User: codeh...@debian.org
> Usertags: la-file-removal
> To finish an old release goal from Squeeze, to comply with Policy
> 10.2 and to ease the introduction of MultiArch, I'm filing bugs
> against packages which c
]] Luca Capello
Hi,
| > * do another mass bug filing on all packages that contain bash
| > scripts that checkbashisms does not think contain any bashisms
|
| ...there is no point using #!/bin/bash when the script is
| POSIX-compliant, since the default #!/bin/sh on Debian (dash) i
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 12:15:49PM +0200, Vincent Caron wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 01:09 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 05:15:15PM +0200, Vincent Caron wrote:
> > > 2/ It is suggested to update gnupg.conf with:
> > >
> > > personal-digest-preferences SHA256
> >
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 05:42:48PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > I would love if we can summarize the above part by saying that we have
> > consensus on: 1) announcing at the beginning of a release cycle a target
> > freeze month, 2) refining it later on.
>
> I think you're missing step 0: the r
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:00:09PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> [ Bcc:-ing release team ]
Why Bcc?!
[...]
> I would love if we can summarize the above part by saying that we have
> consensus on: 1) announcing at the beginning of a release cycle a target
> freeze month, 2) refining it later
Hi Lars!
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 16:41:14 +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On ke, 2011-04-06 at 16:37 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>> Obviously, doing these changes earlier rather than later in the release
>> cycle would be good, if they are to be done at all.
>
> OK, so assuming anything is to be done
Hi Roger!
Please do not Cc: me, I read the list.
NB, this reply is maybe too late and useless, but I thought it was
better to do that anyway, at least to thank Roger for the time he spent.
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:24:28 +0200, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 04:06:16PM +0200, Luca Cap
David Paleino writes:
> On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:16:20 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
>> You'd better use some apt hook to do the task you envision. A file
>> trigger that is activated for a majority of package installation is
>> probably better dealt with such a solution.
>
> Which hook would you
Hi Carsten, just a few more comments on your mail which I haven't
covered in the separate "summary" mail I've just sent.
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:38:18AM +0200, Carsten Hey wrote:
> We are in the good position to have a very experienced release team that
> is be able to decide whether testing is
[ Bcc:-ing release team ]
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 06:15:52PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Since other follow-ups have avoided this topic up to now, let me be the
> reckless guy who jumps into it with both feet: time based freezes!
Another thread, another thread summary! Here is a summary ab
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:16:20 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011, David Paleino wrote:
> > Hello everybody,
> > I've implemented a new revision of bash-completion, which uses
> > debtriggers(5) to load only relevant completions, and symlink them when
> > something touches /
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 16:33 +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Joey Hess writes:
> > * pristine-tar cannot be used
>
> The assumptions of ‘pristine-tar’ seem very Git-centric and are quite at
> odds with my chosen VCS (Bazaar). It demands a “treeish object”, I have
> no idea what that relates to in Bazaa
[ Bcc:-ing ftpmasters ]
Time to wrap up the current state of this discussion, at least as far as
I see it.
- going ahead with throw away debs seems to be largely uncontroversial;
can we haz zem please? :-)
- there seems to be no substantial objections either on the fact the
source only uploa
On ke, 2011-04-06 at 16:37 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Obviously, doing these changes earlier rather than later in the release
> cycle would be good, if they are to be done at all.
OK, so assuming anything is to be done about this at all, here's what I
suggest:
* add a lintian test that
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 12:15:49PM +0200, Vincent Caron wrote:
>That's a nice explanation that would fit on
> http://keyring.debian.org/creating-key.html
If someone would like to put it up there, he or she should feel free to
do so.
> Thanks for your help.
Sure.
--
brian m. carlson / bri
El posicionamiento web es una estrategia usada para dar a conocer tu sitio web
o marca por internet.
El objetivo es tener mayor presencia en la web que tus competidores,y conseguir
que tu sitio aparezca en la 1ra. pagina de Google, Yahoo y principales
buscadores.
Si ya usas Google Adwords, apr
Hi,
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011, David Paleino wrote:
> Hello everybody,
> I've implemented a new revision of bash-completion, which uses debtriggers(5)
> to load only relevant completions, and symlink them when something
> touches /usr/bin/, /usr/games/, /usr/sbin/, /sbin/, /bin/, and so on.
>
> For thi
On 04/07/2011 10:11 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> http://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamMetadata
>
> The key concept is to store ‘Field: value’ data in a file called
> debian/upstream-metadata.yaml, and to access it from the VCS where
> the package is stored (that is, not from the source package itself).
Hi Andrew,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:15:15PM +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> Hi Guido,
>
> I have an interest in calendaring & contacts myself, and while I
> probably can't make it to such meetings very often in Europe I'd
> appreciate being aware of plans, just in case I can participate in some
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 08:22:06AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> There are lots of upstream-metadata that we might want to have available
> and we need to find a proper solution that doesn't involve debian/control.
In Debian Med and Debian Science we are just using
http://wiki.debian.org/
Hello Hendrik Sattler,
Am 2011-04-07 12:56:33, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> I am also not totally happy about network-manager but I still use it
> as it gives me a working wireless network on my laptop without
> having to spend hours reading endless documentation and writing
> multiple config
Hello Philip Hands,
Am 2011-04-06 10:13:19, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
> I think this is the vital difference -- those that prefer ifupdown do so
> because they prefer to be in tight control of what is happening on their
> systems, whereas those that prefer NM don't want to be bothered about
Zitat von Stanislav Maslovski :
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:51:08PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
Am Mittwoch 06 April 2011, 19:05:11 schrieb Stanislav Maslovski:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:29:05AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Then you can stack all soft of stuff on top of it, and ge
Hello Goswin,
re-putting debian-devel in the loop, since I believe you forgot it.
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:20:34 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> David Paleino writes:
>
> > Hello everybody,
> > I've implemented a new revision of bash-completion, which uses
> > debtriggers(5) to load only rel
Carsten Hey writes:
> System shells would (de)register themselves by calling add-system-shell
> in postinst and remove-system-shell in prerm. 'system-shell' would also
> be a virtual package provided by bash, dash and so on. Although I don't
How would that work with (c)debootstrap/multistrap w
Hello everybody,
I've implemented a new revision of bash-completion, which uses debtriggers(5)
to load only relevant completions, and symlink them when something
touches /usr/bin/, /usr/games/, /usr/sbin/, /sbin/, /bin/, and so on.
For this to work, the completions have been moved out from /etc/ -
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Joey Hess wrote:
> I would instead suggest we deprecate packages not including upstream
> source in their VCS. The weight of progress is against that practice;
> tools have improved so there is little excuse to do it, it increasingly
> violates expections and makes
Le Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:53:55PM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit :
>
> However, is the control file really the right place for that? I guess we
> don't have a better place right now, but this doesn't feel like package
> metadata that needs to be put into the Sources file.
Hi,
there is my pet proj
On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:37:28 +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
...
> Obviously, checkbashisms is not infallible, so the numbers may well be
> off. If I remove all the "not bash" scripts from bash2.list, I get a
> much shorter file: http://files.liw.fi/temp/bash2-isbash.list
>
> Summary:
>
> 1775 file
OoO En cette aube naissante du jeudi 07 avril 2011, vers 07:46, Joey
Hess disait :
>> We (lindi, liw and me) had just a short discussion in #-devel, that it
>> would be nice to have some sort of Vcs-Upstream-* in debian/control, to
>> be able to get to upstreams vcs history if it is not impor
43 matches
Mail list logo
