[Osamu Aoki]
> As I read manpage of dh_md5sums, it states:
>-x, --include-conffiles
>Include conffiles in the md5sums list. Note that this
> information is redundant since it is included elsewhere in debian
> packages.
"Note that this information is redundant" - that's rich.
Osamu Aoki writes:
> As I read manpage of dh_md5sums, it states:
>-x, --include-conffiles
>Include conffiles in the md5sums list. Note that this
> information is redundant since it is included elsewhere in debian
> packages.
> I have no idea what this is.
The *.conffiles fil
HI,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:02:44PM -0800, Tristan Schmelcher wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Goswin von Brederlow
> wrote:
> > Osamu Aoki writes:
> >
> >> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:06:45AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:52:28PM -0800, Tr
Hi,
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> >> These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely
> >> is affected by the vulnerability:
> >>
> >> ---
> >> chmod 640 $FRESHCLAMLOG
Hi,
> [...]
> >
> > These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely
> > is affected by the vulnerability:
> >
> > ---
> > chmod 640 $FRESHCLAMLOGFILE
> > chown "$dbowner":adm $FRESHCLAMLOGFILE
> > -
Hola!!!
Muchas Bendiciones para ti y tu familia, deseo invitarte a "Bendita la
lluvia" es una comunidad privada cuya actividad se realiza exclusivamente a
través de Internet. Es nació como iniciativa de un grupo de líderes de
diferentes países y continentes, que tienen amplia experiencia en progra
Hi,
> (copying the thread to debian-devel, where mass-bug-fills *has to* be
> discussed, not d-qa)
As such I would suggest completely moving this thread over to d-devel
and dropping d-qa from subsequent mails.
[...]
> > If I don't see any solution emerging in a reasonable time frame, my next
> >
Hi,
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> > If you really care about this problem, which is nice, try to get
> > logrotate fixed.
>
> As I have said before, I do welcome patches that don't break existing
> functionality or introduce new race conditions.
Let me quote
Hi Bernhard,
Am Donnerstag, den 09.12.2010, 12:03 +0100 schrieb Bernhard Hauser:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Bernhard Hauser
>
> * Package name: cnagios
> Version : 0.27
> Upstream Author : Steve Rader
> * URL : ftp://noc.hep.wisc.edu/pub/src/cnagio
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:12 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Osamu Aoki writes:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:06:45AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 12:52:28PM -0800, Tristan Schmelcher wrote:
>>> > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:30 PM, Goswin von Brederlow
>>>
On 10/12/2010 16:59, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> [C] selection of the "tool chain"
>> Comment: this seems to be very boost specific!
>
> Not necessary at the moment.
>
>>For what I saw, there is the MT/no thread choice. Are there oth
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> [C] selection of the "tool chain"
> Comment: this seems to be very boost specific!
Not necessary at the moment.
> For what I saw, there is the MT/no thread choice. Are there others ?
> It is possible that boost will be used by differ
Hi,
On 10/12/2010 13:59, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> People who do need this can build multiple versions, install them
>> into different prefixes and then set PKG_CONFIG_PATH to select
>> the variant they want at configure time. Unlike Boos
Mark Brown wrote:
> The most likely culprit here would seem to be a glibc issue or a local
> misconfiguration caused during the upgrade.
Oh, I used the term 'upgrade', which was misleading.
The system where the bug occurs is an amd64 squeeze installation from
scratch, done last week. (Upgrade fr
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> So?
>
> When we write code, we write it with the intention and expectation
> that it will be built using a standards-conforming compiler. I.e.
> one which implements the C and/or C++ language specification, and
> which also implements standar
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:00:24PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Roger Leigh wrote:
> >> I was wondering why you considered the auto linking stuff to be so
> >> horrible.
> >> IMO the best solution would be to get auto link support into GCC too.
> >
> > It's no
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Paul Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
>> If you really care about this problem, which is nice, try to get
>> logrotate fixed.
>
> As I have said before, I do welcome patches that don't break existing
> functionality or
Hi,
On Freitag, 10. Dezember 2010, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> (CC'ed debian-devel as this was a not-so-well coordinated MBF without
> announcement to debian-devel, dd-list, usertags; so maybe at least further
> discussion can happen there)
thanks for that.
I've reassigned all these bugs to logr
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> If you really care about this problem, which is nice, try to get
> logrotate fixed.
As I have said before, I do welcome patches that don't break existing
functionality or introduce new race conditions.
None of my emails to Florian ar
(copying the thread to debian-devel, where mass-bug-fills *has to* be
discussed, not d-qa)
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 08:23, Florian Zumbiehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The short summary:
>
> 1. There is a privilege escalation vulnerability in stable's logrotate,
> verified to work for switching from the po
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>> These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely
>> is affected by the vulnerability:
>>
>> ---
>> chmod 640 $FRESHCLAMLOGFILE
>> chown "$d
(CC'ed debian-devel as this was a not-so-well coordinated MBF without
announcement to debian-devel, dd-list, usertags; so maybe at least further
discussion can happen there)
Hi Florian,
[...]
>
> These lines from this package's maintainer scripts suggest that it likely
> is affected by the vulne
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:38 AM, Fernando Lemos wrote:
> Hi Olaf, Roger
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Olaf van der Spek
> wrote:
> [...]
>>> Now, pkg-config isn't standardised /either/, but it's useful because
>>> it will work with any standards-conforming compiler. It's just a
>>> gener
23 matches
Mail list logo
