On 2010-09-23 21:26, David Kalnischkies wrote:
2010/9/23 Filipus Klutiero:
On 2010-09-23 05:32, Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Filipus Klutiero
wrote:
[...]
I would recommend requiring candidate mentors to agree to share
evaluations
with GSoC admins, so admins ca
On 9/24/10, Simon McVittie wrote:
> Suspend-to-RAM also works, but is obviously not secure against attackers
> waking up the laptop and exploiting some bug in a locked screensaver, or
> remote access, or whatever.
Don't forget about folks using cold boot attacks to grab your key from
RAM. I also
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Steele
* Package name: gnome-gmail
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : David Steele
* URL : http://gnome-gmail.sourceforge.net/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Make Gmail an option for t
2010/9/23 Filipus Klutiero :
> On 2010-09-23 05:32, Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Filipus Klutiero
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>> I would recommend requiring candidate mentors to agree to share
>>> evaluations
>>> with GSoC admins, so admins can at least pick informatio
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Stepping in sideways here, but in case you can make use of them,
> backports is creating the same debversion info like the main
> archive. Want them synced to the bts?
Yes, please.
Don Armstrong
--
Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is ver
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul McEnery
* Package name: yii-framework
Version : 1.1.4
Upstream Author : Qiang Xue
* URL : http://www.yiiframework.com
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: PHP
Description : High-performance component-based PHP
Marc Haber writes:
> The ftp team has a history of strongly discouraging uploads that they
> don't feel like accepting (such as a package that would download
> eicar.com from the internet and place it in a defined place where other
> packages might find and use it) and of killing of packages on g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alessio Treglia
* Package name: ukopp
Version : 3.8
Upstream Author : Michael Cornelison
* URL : http://kornelix.squarespace.com/ukopp/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Full incremental backup to
On 2010-09-23 05:32, Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
[...]
I would recommend requiring candidate mentors to agree to share evaluations
with GSoC admins, so admins can at least pick information on results when a
report has to be made.
Mentors ar
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:30:30 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Personally I would like to have snapshots every 2 or 3 months. Colin
> Watson pointed out in an LWN comment (http://lwn.net/Articles/406597/):
> | There's a good chance that CUT could serve a dual purpose of making it
> | easier to prepar
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 at 17:31:39 +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
> Indeed. My current setup is that sda1 is small, unencrypted and holds
> /boot only. sda2 is the whole rest of the hard disk, and it's mapped to
> a LUKS device used as a physical volume for LVM, and there are several
> LVs on there, inclu
Mike Hommey, 2010-09-23 17:14:01 +0200 :
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:50:26PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:13:06PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> ...
>> > By policy, we use full-disk encryption at my workplace (where full-disk
>> > really means "except the bootloader and
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:50:26PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:13:06PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> ...
> > By policy, we use full-disk encryption at my workplace (where full-disk
> > really means "except the bootloader and /boot"). For a 2-year-old recipe for
> > it, wh
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:13:06PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
...
> By policy, we use full-disk encryption at my workplace (where full-disk
> really means "except the bootloader and /boot"). For a 2-year-old recipe for
> it, which I believe still mostly works with grub2, see
> http://smcv.pseudor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 23/09/2010 08:59, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino ha scritto:
> On 22 September 2010 22:46, A Mennucc wrote:
>> due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the
>> last week (while I was absent); I found more space, so it will be b
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 11:23:55 +0200, Julien Cristau
wrote:
>As far as I can tell the FTP team bases its accept/reject decisions on
>whether it's legal for us to distribute a package (and whether it's
>suitable for the component it was uploaded to in terms of the dfsg), not
>whether it's a good idea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 22/09/2010 22:46, A Mennucc ha scritto:
> due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the
> last week
It seems that there was another problem: there is broken pdiff in
amd64/experimental, so that debmirror was not updating m
(Context: a private mail to which I'm replying suggested that full-disk
encryption should be used to make it harder to subvert our infrastructure,
and worried about the use of an unencrypted /boot, since "they" could
insert a keylogger or trojan into the initrd.)
By policy, we use full-disk encryp
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Janos Guljas
* Package name: emerald-themes
Version : 0.6.0
Upstream Author : Quinn Storm
* URL : http://cgit.compiz.org/fusion/decorators/emerald-themes/
* License : GPL
Description : Themes for Emerald Window Dec
Hi Luk,
thanks for your comment!
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
> > Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
> > discussing CUT on -de...@.
> > Free link: http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
>
> Personally I have the feeling that if we would
On 09/23/2010 09:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 22/09/10 at 15:01 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>>> CUT discussions at debconf10 and recent news of the birth of Linux Mint
>>
>> discussions on CUT have continued after debconf on the
Am 22.09.2010 08:56, schrieb Olivier Berger:
> Le lundi 20 septembre 2010 à 12:47 +0200, Adrian von Bidder a écrit :
>> Hi Arthur,
>>
>> On Monday 20 September 2010 11.37:04 Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
>> [GSoC report]
>>
>> Hmm. It would have been nice to hear about what the students did and how
>> f
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Adrian von Bidder
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Arthur,
>> >
>> > On Monday 20 September 2010 11.37:04 Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
>> > [GSoC report]
>> >
>> > Hmm. It would have been
Hi,
On Wed, 22 Sep 2010, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> hm... did you mean
> http://lwn.net/Articles/406301/
> "A constantly usable testing distribution for Debian"?
Yes.
> if indeed, taken on the reasoning that "testing" is a bad name and "rolling"
> is
> better, then it goes similar to what I sa
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 17:12:49 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
> >
> > So what backports "priority" actually says is "my package is such a
> > bullshit that I don't want it ever released, but I am fine with putting
> > burden on t
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 09/23/2010 09:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
> > discussing CUT on -de...@. Free link:
> > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
> >
>
> It's still looks we
On 23/09/10 at 10:40 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 09/23/2010 09:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
> > discussing CUT on -de...@. Free link:
> > http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
> >
>
> It's still l
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 10:36 +0200, Roland Mas wrote:
> William Grant, 2010-09-23 16:31:57 +1000 :
>
> [...]
>
> > While Launchpad.net does not provide Debian PPAs, what prevents you from
> > taking the Launchpad code, rebranding it, and running your own instance?
>
> Based on a presentation give
On 09/23/2010 09:00 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> Raphael's article is now published, and is probably a good basis for
> discussing CUT on -de...@. Free link:
> http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/406301/bd522adc828b3461/
>
It's still looks weired to me to have to read this article there (I
mean, _o
William Grant, 2010-09-23 16:31:57 +1000 :
[...]
> While Launchpad.net does not provide Debian PPAs, what prevents you from
> taking the Launchpad code, rebranding it, and running your own instance?
Based on a presentation given by Jonathan Lange (product strategist for
Launchpad) at LSM this su
Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Adrian von Bidder
wrote:
> Hi Arthur,
>
> On Monday 20 September 2010 11.37:04 Obey Arthur Liu wrote:
> [GSoC report]
>
> Hmm. It would have been nice to hear about what the students did and how
> far they got in their GSoC project
Le Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 09:17:02AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert a écrit :
>
> So what backports "priority" actually says is "my package is such a
> bullshit that I don't want it ever released, but I am fine with putting
> burden on the people keeping backports running instead". I think we have
> a way alr
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:31:57PM +1000, William Grant wrote:
> While Launchpad.net does not provide Debian PPAs, what prevents you from
> taking the Launchpad code, rebranding it, and running your own instance?
> It does require some changes to work with Debian's suites, but that
> would be far e
>> From what concerns the BTS, Don's proposal in [2] (the main one, not
>> the alternative solution) seems reasonable to me and others in the
>> thread. The proposal also seems to assume a different Maintainer
>> field for the bpo package, as hinted above, am I wrong Don?
> Right. The idea here is
> the addition of new suites has the disadvantage of dispersing our userbase.
> Here is a proposition that conserves the current flow of package migration for
> packages released in Stable, and that makes Testing the meeting point for all
> the packages.
> We could introduce a new priority level
On 22 September 2010 22:46, A Mennucc wrote:
> due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the
> last week (while I was absent); I found more space, so it will be back
> online as soon as it generates all needed deltas.
Question: How much space does debdelta take? (per arc
> I still believe that this can and should be implemented. If someone is
> interested, I'm happy to help; I assume the same holds for Joerg.
True.
--
bye, Joerg
Yeah, patching debian/rules sounds like changing shoes while running the
100 meters track.
-- Michael Koch
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
On 22/09/10 at 15:01 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > CUT discussions at debconf10 and recent news of the birth of Linux Mint
>
> discussions on CUT have continued after debconf on the CUT mailing. I
> wrote a summary of the discussion
38 matches
Mail list logo
