Re: RFH: How to compile swf files from source

2010-08-04 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du jeudi 05 août 2010, vers 05:52, Paul Wise disait : >> In my package ampache it ships xspf_jukebox.fla and xspf_jukebox.swf and >> I recently received bug #591202 which states: > ... >> Are there debian tools available to do this?  If so what are they? > The FL

Bug#591737: ITP: pd-moonlib -- library of Pd objects related to GUI control

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" * Package name: pd-moonlib Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Antoine Rousseau * URL : http://puredata.info/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : library of Pd objects relate

Bug#591736: ITP: pd-motex -- Pd Externals by Iain Mott

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" * Package name: pd-motex Version : 1.1.4 Upstream Author : Iain Mott * URL : http://puredata.info/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C, Pd Description : Pd Externals by Iain Mott A

Bug#591735: ITP: pd-pan -- a library of stereo panning algorithms for Pd

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" * Package name: pd-pan Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Hans-Christoph Steiner * URL : http://puredata.info/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Pd Description : a library of stereo pann

Re: RFH: How to compile swf files from source

2010-08-04 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Charlie Smotherman wrote: > In my package ampache it ships xspf_jukebox.fla and xspf_jukebox.swf and > I recently received bug #591202 which states: ... > Are there debian tools available to do this?  If so what are they? The FLA format is binary and completely un

Re: RFH: How to compile swf files from source

2010-08-04 Thread Joerg Jaspert
> In my package ampache it ships xspf_jukebox.fla and xspf_jukebox.swf and > I recently received bug #591202 which states: > "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." > I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is > required? I have search but was una

Bug#591732: ITP: pd-pddp -- a support library for the Pure Data Documentation Project

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" * Package name: pd-pddp Version : 0.1.0 Upstream Author : Pd Developers * URL : http://puredata.info/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C, Pd Description : a support library for the P

l7-filter does not mark any package

2010-08-04 Thread Niccolò Belli
Hi, I can send packets from the mangle chain to l7-filter, but analyzing packets in output on the filter chain you can see packets had not been marked. l7-filter loads all the patterns flawlessly and does not give any error. ### POLICY ### iptables -P INPUT DROP iptables -P OUTPUT DROP iptables

Bug#591729: ITP: hawtjni -- Java library that provide JNI code generation

2010-08-04 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: hawtjni Version : 1.0-SNAPSHOT Upstream Author : Progress Software, Inc. * URL : http://fusesource.com/forge/sites/hawtjni/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description

Bug#591728: ITP: jansi -- Java library that allows to use ANSI escape sequences

2010-08-04 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: jansi Version : 1.4 Upstream Author : Progress Software, Inc. * URL : http://jansi.fusesource.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : Java library for gener

Bug#591727: ITP: jansi-native -- Java library that allows to use ANSI escape sequences - Native impl

2010-08-04 Thread Miguel Landaeta
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Landaeta * Package name: jansi-native Version : 1.0 Upstream Author : Progress Software, Inc. * URL : http://jansi.fusesource.org/ * License : Apache-2.0 Programming Lang: Java Description : Java library th

Re: Are binary packages required to be built from the corresponding source files?

2010-08-04 Thread Ben Finney
Russ Allbery writes: > In other words, not building from source every time is not, in itself, > a Policy violation. What's a Policy violation is shipping binaries > that we *can't* build from source. Yes, that better expresses my own understanding. Thanks for clarifying. > (Please note: it may

Re: RFH: How to compile swf files from source

2010-08-04 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Aug 04, Charlie Smotherman wrote: > "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." > > I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is > required? I have search but was unable to find anything. The part stating that packages cannot depend on components not

Re: Are binary packages required to be built from the corresponding source files?

2010-08-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Ben Finney writes: > Charlie Smotherman writes: >> "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." >> >> I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is >> required? I have search but was unable to find anything. > I would interpret it as follows: > Policy §

Re: Are binary packages required to be built from the corresponding source files? (was: RFH: How to compile swf files from source)

2010-08-04 Thread Charlie Smotherman
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 10:48 +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Charlie Smotherman writes: > > > "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." > > > > I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is > > required? I have search but was unable to find anything. > > I w

Are binary packages required to be built from the corresponding source files? (was: RFH: How to compile swf files from source)

2010-08-04 Thread Ben Finney
Charlie Smotherman writes: > "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." > > I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is > required? I have search but was unable to find anything. I would interpret it as follows: Policy §2.2.1 states “Every package in

Re: RFH: How to compile swf files from source

2010-08-04 Thread Charlie Smotherman
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 16:59 -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > [Charlie Smotherman] > > "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." > > > > I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is > > required? I have search but was unable to find anything. > > It is t

Bug#591713: ITP: pd-smlib -- Signal processing library for Mapping, for Pd

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" * Package name: pd-smlib Version : 0.12.1 Upstream Author : Johannes Taelman * URL : http://puredata.info/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : Signal processing library

Bug#591711: ITP: pd-pdogg -- a collection of ogg/vorbis objects for Pd

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" * Package name: pd-pdogg Version : 0.25 Upstream Author : Olaf Matthes * URL : http://puredata.info/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : a collection of ogg/vorbis objec

Bug#591709: ITP: pd-pmpd -- physical modeling library for Pd

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" * Package name: pd-pmpd Version : 0.9 Upstream Author : Cyrille Henry * URL : http://drpichon.free.fr/pmpd/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : physical modeling library

Bug#591708: ITP: pd-purepd -- a library of standard objects re-implemented using Pd-vanilla

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" * Package name: pd-purepd Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Pd Developers * URL : http://puredata.info/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: Pd Description : a library of standard objects

Bug#591707: ITP: pd-smlib -- signal processing library for Pd for mapping data

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" * Package name: pd-sigpack Version : 0.0.4.1 Upstream Author : we...@weiss-archiv.de * URL : http://www.weiss-archiv.de/pure-data.htm * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description :

Bug#591704: ITP: pd-windowing -- a library of windowing functions in Pd

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-Christoph Steiner
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Hans-Christoph Steiner" * Package name: pd-windowing Version : 0.1 Upstream Author : Joseph A. Sarlo * URL : http://crca.ucsd.edu/~jsarlo/pd/ * License : GPL-2+ Programming Lang: C Description : a library of wi

Re: RFH: How to compile swf files from source

2010-08-04 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Peter Samuelson] > Source code is a means to an end. The end is the ability of the end > user to customize the software. If you get source code but no way to > build a new .swf file from it, this end is not served. Also, I'm a proponent of the idea of always building our packages from source -

Re: RFH: How to compile swf files from source

2010-08-04 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Charlie Smotherman] > "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." > > I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is > required? I have search but was unable to find anything. It is the principle. If I am an end user, and I want to modify your .swf file

RFH: How to compile swf files from source

2010-08-04 Thread Charlie Smotherman
Hello all, In my package ampache it ships xspf_jukebox.fla and xspf_jukebox.swf and I recently received bug #591202 which states: "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is required? I have search but was u

RFH: How to compile swf files from source

2010-08-04 Thread Charlie Smotherman
Hello all, In my package ampache it ships xspf_jukebox.fla and xspf_jukebox.swf and I recently received bug #591202 which states: "ampache ships a swf file but does not build it from source." I am curious to know which part of Debian Policy states that this is required? I have search but was u

Re: segmentation fault (a.o. in /u/s/debconf/frontend)

2010-08-04 Thread Hans-J. Ullrich
Am Mittwoch, 4. August 2010 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > Hi, > > since yesterday I get a series of segmentation faults on my system > which makes it impossible to install or upgrade packages or even start > X. The system is inside a virtualbox so I don't think that hardware > errors are the cause.

Re: RFA: a lot of packages

2010-08-04 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hej Magnus You are welcome to do so. It should be easy. Best regards, // Ola On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:43:55PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On lördagen den 19 juni 2010, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > > Hi fellow debian developers > > > > I have found out that I have less time for Debian than befo

Bug#591684: ITP: liblog-any-adapter-perl -- tell Log::Any where to log

2010-08-04 Thread USB
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Ernesto Hernández-Novich (USB)" * Package name: liblog-any-adapter-perl Version : 0.03 Upstream Author : Jonathan Swartz * URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Any-Adapter/ * License : Artistic Programming Lang: Per

Re: RFA: a lot of packages

2010-08-04 Thread Magnus Holmgren
On lördagen den 19 juni 2010, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > Hi fellow debian developers > > I have found out that I have less time for Debian than before. > Therefore I would like someone to take over some of my packages. > You can see the list of RFA bugs that I have submitted to > WNPP. > > Bug#586422

Re: Re: Re: segmentation fault (a.o. in /u/s/debconf/frontend)

2010-08-04 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 at 17:18:05 +0200, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > In the "Name: debconf/frontend" section of > /usr/cache/debconf/config.dat I manually changed the "Value: Gnome" > field to "Readline" and now I can run "apt-get -f install" and > finally have my system back in a usable state. Do you

Re: Re: Re: segmentation fault (a.o. in /u/s/debconf/frontend)

2010-08-04 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Found a workaround: In the "Name: debconf/frontend" section of /usr/cache/debconf/config.dat I manually changed the "Value: Gnome" field to "Readline" and now I can run "apt-get -f install" and finally have my system back in a usable state. Sorry for the noise, - Fabian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: Re: Re: segmentation fault (a.o. in /u/s/debconf/frontend)

2010-08-04 Thread Fabian Greffrath
More information on this issue: The segfault in /u/s/debconf/frontend occurs as soon as the command mx $frontend=make_frontend(); in line 14 is executed. I found this out by cutting off the tail of this file from line 15 on and running it via 'perl -w'. If I cut off from line 13 on the script

Re: Re: segmentation fault (a.o. in /u/s/debconf/frontend)

2010-08-04 Thread Fabian Greffrath
I think you want reportbug here. Except for the fact that reportbug dies with a segmentation fault. :/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c5977e6.2030.

Re: segmentation fault (a.o. in /u/s/debconf/frontend)

2010-08-04 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On 04/08/2010 11:54, Fabian Greffrath wrote: > Unfortunately, a reboot did not help to fix the issue on my system. I am > running a testing/unstable mixture, by the way. I think you want reportbug here. -- Yves-Alexis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a sub

Re: mass bug filing: packages not installable on any architecture

2010-08-04 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:27 +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote: > Hi! > > * Ben Hutchings [100804 04:42]: > > > > http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/unstable/latest/every/list.php > > I think some of these are old versions of arch:all packages that for > > some reason have not been

Re: segmentation fault (a.o. in /u/s/debconf/frontend)

2010-08-04 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Am 04.08.2010 11:30, schrieb b...@bc-bd.org: I have seen something similar on my NC10 running testing (native, no virtualization) after hibernating/resuming it. A reboot fixed that. Also, that problem fixed itself before I could get a clue on what was causing it. Unfortunately, a reboot did not

segmentation fault (a.o. in /u/s/debconf/frontend)

2010-08-04 Thread Fabian Greffrath
Hi, since yesterday I get a series of segmentation faults on my system which makes it impossible to install or upgrade packages or even start X. The system is inside a virtualbox so I don't think that hardware errors are the cause. I don't remember having changed anything fundamental in this

Re: When the init.d script exist, the service should be operational

2010-08-04 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mardi 03 août 2010 à 10:45 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit : > If you maintain a package with a service started during boot using a > init.d script, please make sure your service is operational when the > init.d script exits. I can tell you that gdm3 is not, just as any service that uses s-s

Bug#591619: ITP: libubuntuone -- Ubuntu One widget library

2010-08-04 Thread Andrew Mitchell
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Andrew Mitchell * Package name: libubuntuone Version : 0.3.2 Upstream Author : Canonical * URL : https://launchpad.net/libubuntuone * License : GPL 2+ Programming Lang: C Description : Ubuntu One widget library

Re: mass bug filing: packages not installable on any architecture

2010-08-04 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! * Ben Hutchings [100804 04:42]: > > http://edos.debian.net/edos-debcheck/results/unstable/latest/every/list.php > I think some of these are old versions of arch:all packages that for > some reason have not been automatically removed. I think you should > consider only the latest version of