I propose the following policy for squeeze and later releases. This
affects all Linux kernel, initramfs builder and boot loader packages,
and the installer.
I regret that this is happening so late in the release cycle, but
currently a kernel update can easily leave the system unbootable and
this
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Janos Guljas
* Package name: python-fs
Version : 3.0
Upstream Author : Will McGugan
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/pyfilesystem/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Python filesystem abstrac
Michael Prokop wrote on 2010-06-18 23:48:
> we - the initramfs-tools maintainers in Debian - want to provide a
> solid initramfs-tools version for squeeze. The new release 0.97 is
> expected to fix many longstanding problems. It would be great if we
> could receive feedback from testers.
>
> The
Seeing as though upstream Firefox 3.6 released December 1, 2008, and
upstream Thunderbird 3.1 released just a couple days ago, it might be
high time to get xulrunner 1.9.2 into Sid, as both Iceweasel 3.6 and
Icedove 3.1 will depend on it. However, I hear there will be lots of
breakage if xulrunner
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 10:31:32 +0200, Josselin Mouette
wrote:
>Le samedi 26 juin 2010 à 22:30 +0200, Marc Haber a écrit :
>> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:20:46 +0200, Josselin Mouette
>> wrote:
>> >Furthermore, I’d be interested to know how to fix such a “shortcoming”
>> >in our software. If both A and B
Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In October 2009, I posted an article about D-Link's Shareport USB
> Utility (see e.g.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-u...@lists.debian.org/msg557390.html)
> to linux.debian.user. Do you remember? I posted to
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9513066#po
[Christoph Anton Mitterer]
> Hi folks.
>
> IIRC, Jonas already put some of these issues up here some time ago.
> I was recently investigating, and thanks to the help of many people
> found out how deep the problems actually are.
I suspect this problem is one best solved by using an event based
sy
Le samedi 26 juin 2010 à 22:30 +0200, Marc Haber a écrit :
> On Sat, 26 Jun 2010 15:20:46 +0200, Josselin Mouette
> wrote:
> >Furthermore, I’d be interested to know how to fix such a “shortcoming”
> >in our software. If both A and B depend on each other, A.postinst must
> >be executed before B.pos
8 matches
Mail list logo