Le Fri, May 28, 2010 at 08:25:25AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
> On Thu, 27 May 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > * In Debian changes files, Format is currently 1.8; I suppose that it
> >defines the meaning and syntax of the other fields. Is there a place
> > were the
> >history of thi
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 May 2010, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> 1. If your name is on the list at [2] please check at [3] the .dsc
>> file that corresponds to the source packages you co-/maintain,
>> review and fix. The .dsc files contain checkbashisms' output.
>
> Do you want to sta
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Stephen Kitt
Owner: Stephen Kitt
* Package name: dasm
Version : 2.20.11
Upstream Author : Peter H. Froehlich
* URL : http://dasm-dillon.sf.net
* License : GPL-2
Programming Lang: C
Description : macro assembler
On 05/28/2010 09:20 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Fr, Mai 28, 2010 at 16:00:27 (CEST), Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/28/2010 01:25 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I'm going to package rtmpdump next week.
On Fr, Mai 22, 2009 at 16:33:44 (CEST), Sam Morris wrote:
* Package name: rtmpdump
* URL
[Stephen Powell]
> It *does* recognize lilo and has special logic to patch lilo after
> the restore so that the machine will boot.
So can this software be fooled into thinking it is dealing with lilo?
Would it be sufficient to rename /boot/extlinux/extlinux.sys to
/boot/maps or something?
--
Pet
2010/5/28 Stephen Leake :
> Ludovic Brenta writes:
>
>> Stephen Leake wrote:
>>> Ludovic Brenta writes:
The reason for all this is that when a package libX2-dev Conflicts:
>> with
and Replaces: a package libX1-dev, aptitude does not remove libX1-dev
and install libX2-dev; instead,
Le vendredi 28 mai 2010 à 10:45 -0400, Stephen Powell a écrit :
> Unfortunately, logical backups of a Linux machine using the extlinux
> boot loader do not work with our backup/restore software. The master boot
> record and partition boot sector are restored correctly, but
> /boot/extlinux/extlinu
On Tue, 25 May 2010 13:12:27 -0400 (EDT), Stephen Powell wrote:
> Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
>> No software is entirely without cost ...
>> volunteers work on whatever they like ...
>> your specific requirements may differ from their goals ...
>> volunteers are rarely concerned with "market sh
On Fr, Mai 28, 2010 at 16:00:27 (CEST), Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/28/2010 01:25 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> I'm going to package rtmpdump next week.
>>
>> On Fr, Mai 22, 2009 at 16:33:44 (CEST), Sam Morris wrote:
>>
>>> * Package name: rtmpdump
>>> * URL : [hidden obsolete url]
On 05/28/2010 01:25 AM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
retitle 529974 ITP: rtmpdump -- download media streamed with the RTMP/RTMPE
protocol
owner 529974 !
stop
I'm going to package rtmpdump next week.
On Fr, Mai 22, 2009 at 16:33:44 (CEST), Sam Morris wrote:
* Package name: rtmpdump
* URL
Stephen Leake wrote:
Currently, a package is upgraded only if its name does not change.
Good point.
Is the hack then to introduce a new "lib-dev"
package which is empty but depends on
"lib-dev"?
Lots of empty packages, just to get the upgrade to work, but
if we have a plan for avoiding t
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 11:30:25AM +0200, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
> I'm not sure yet, if I do properly understand the point when/why
> relaxing conditionally is a bad idea. To me, setting *fixed* umasks with
> group permissions equaling user permissions seems worse,
> especially because not all users
Ludovic Brenta writes:
> Stephen Leake wrote:
>> Ludovic Brenta writes:
>>> The reason for all this is that when a package libX2-dev Conflicts:
> with
>>> and Replaces: a package libX1-dev, aptitude does not remove libX1-dev
>>> and install libX2-dev; instead, it marks libX1-dev as broken and le
retitle 529974 ITP: rtmpdump -- download media streamed with the RTMP/RTMPE
protocol
owner 529974 !
stop
I'm going to package rtmpdump next week.
On Fr, Mai 22, 2009 at 16:33:44 (CEST), Sam Morris wrote:
> * Package name: rtmpdump
> * URL : [hidden obsolete url]
> * License
Am Fri, 28 May 2010 08:37:05 +0100
schrieb Roger Leigh:
> Calling getgrgid/getgrnam and
> checking that the user list is empty is *ensuring* that it's private,
> at least at the point in time we check (we can't predict the future).
>
> This check would protect against adding other users to UPGs,
Am Wed, 26 May 2010 08:40:26 +0100
schrieb Stephen Gran:
> first useful argument I've heard for changing adduser's
> behavior. Interoperability with other software is a useful goal,
Would the change have to go into adduser or useradd (part of
base-passwd)?
9.2.1: "Packages other than base-passw
Am 28. Mai 2010 06:08:43 UTC+2 schrieb Miroslav Suchý :
> BTW: our plan for summer, is to develop plugin for apt-get which allows you
> to download packages from Spacewalk server directly using apt-get. That is
> last missing piece for declaring support for Debian as complete.
Feel free to join
On 28/05/2010 00:00, C. Gatzemeier wrote:
2) A special case is true: The group is set as the main group of the
user (in /etc/passwd) while the user is NOT added to his group
in /etc/groups.
May pam_umask test this, for umask relaxation?
Just IMHO, this is *exactly* what pam_umask s
Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:
>> So far this is independent of third packages which is IMHO fine and
>> desirable. So far, this could be solved by a postfix-conf.d-snippet
>> shipped with the amavis package.
> Quite not. You also need to configure the incoming and outgoing
19 matches
Mail list logo
