Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Albert Huang
Owner: Albert Huang
* Package name: urg
Version : 0.8.11
Upstream Author : Satofumi KAMIMURA
* URL :
http://www.hokuyo-aut.jp/02sensor/07scanner/download/urg_programs_en/
* License : LGPL
Pro
On Mon, Mar 29 2010, John Goerzen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm trying to solicit comments on what people are using for development
> environments and how well it's working. Here are some situations I
> imagine are common:
>
> 1. workstation running sid
>
> 2b. Xen, KVM, qemu, or VirtualBox
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:03 AM, John Goerzen wrote:
> 1. workstation running sid
I used that until DebConf9 when I reinstalled and switched from i386 to amd64.
> 2. workstation running squeeze or lenny
At the moment I have only one workstation (a laptop). I use testing,
unstable and experimen
John Goerzen writes:
> 1. workstation running sid
> I've followed this model for over a decade. It works well, in general,
> and I keep up with development well enough that I can fix problems when
> they arise. However, it tends to lead to a certain amount of cruft over
> the years. Moreover,
Hi folks,
I'm trying to solicit comments on what people are using for development
environments and how well it's working. Here are some situations I
imagine are common:
1. workstation running sid
I've followed this model for over a decade. It works well, in general,
and I keep up with developm
> Ideally the package manager front-ends would propose for installation to
> the user all hardware related packages for currently detected hardware
> in the system, or removal once such hardware is not present (although
> that might need to be disabled for pluggable hardware).
The implementation w
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 23:51 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've had this idea in my head for long, but as never found the time to
> work on it, didn't feel appropriate to throw it to the wall and expect
> someone else to implement it. Anyway, it seems to me it might be a nice
> GSoC project
Hi!
I've had this idea in my head for long, but as never found the time to
work on it, didn't feel appropriate to throw it to the wall and expect
someone else to implement it. Anyway, it seems to me it might be a nice
GSoC project, and not necessarily too complex. As I've my plate already
full, I'
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Miguel Landaeta
* Package name: libspring-webflow-2.0-java
Version : 2.0.8.RELEASE
Upstream Author : SpringSource, Inc.
* URL : http://springsource.org/webflow
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Java
Description
I'm asking for adopters for the following packages:
* boa-constructor http://bugs.debian.org/575844
* drpython http://bugs.debian.org/575845
* foff http://bugs.debian.org/575842
* jokosher http://bugs.debian.org/575843
* lfm http:/
Sven Mueller writes:
> Wouter Verhelst schrieb:
>> Of course, this all conveniently ignores the fact that the above
>> explicit non-native option isn't actually supported, which is
>> unfortunate...
> Didn't check for this: Is a bug open to request such a feature to
> explicitly say "1.0 (native
Wouter Verhelst schrieb:
> I might want to have a file with "1.0 (non-native)" to have dpkg error
> out when I accidentally don't have a .orig.tar.gz file somewhere, for
> instance. As long as the absense of that file does not make things
> suddenly break, I don't think there's anything wrong with
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fladischer Michael
Owner: Fladischer Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: django-auth-ldap
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : Peter Sagerson
* URL : http://bitbucket.org/psagers/django-auth-ldap
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I expect this to be of particular interest when we'll have VCS-powered
> source formats (say "3.0 (git2quilt)") that generate source packages that
> are plain "3.0 (quilt)" based on the git repository information.
This is becoming crazy, really.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE
On Mo, 29 Mär 2010, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> you should read debian-devel-announce an it's follow-ups on this list.
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/03/msg00010.html
Ah thanks, missed that one. Good to know that the uploads are not lost.
Best wishes
Norbert
---
Hi,
On Mon Mar 29, 2010 at 19:56:27 +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Is it possible that in the last three days nothing has been updated
> or uploaded, or did I miss some important announcement? (was off
> for some time in the moutains)
>
> Since several days aptitude does not show any updates a
Is it possible that in the last three days nothing has been updated
or uploaded, or did I miss some important announcement? (was off
for some time in the moutains)
Since several days aptitude does not show any updates at all.
Best wishes
Norbert
--
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> FWIW I think debian/source/format sucks big time and its content should
> be moved to debian/control.
Actually it's a design decision to put it outside of the control file:
it's easier to create/modify/discard automatically when needed.
I expect this to
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 04:26:21PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Benjamin Drung writes:
> > Am Montag, den 23.11.2009, 09:18 +0100 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> >> Benjamin Drung writes:
> >> > When a new upstream version is released, I have to check all patches if
> >> > they were accep
Ben Finney wrote:
Hi,
>> The problem is that if debian/source/format is missing for one reason
>> or another, your package will be silently built as a 1.0 source
>> package.
>
> There's no need for it to be silent. The idea was raised that, after a
> period of silent deprecation, the recognition
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:34:39AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:27:41 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Now I am puzzled: 1.4.4~dfsg-4 is in testing. The source package is
arch-any, but the code fails to build on ia64, sparc and Hurd.
How could srtp enter testing with
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:32:27 +0100, ceduardo
wrote:
Hi every body, thaks you for your suggestions.
Well I am learning about C, C++ and Linux programing, jeje I am trying
to be a Debian developer this is my objetive. On my practices use
emacs and others tools from console.
What Do you develo
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 09:02:24AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> I'm surprised by the resistance I see to these changes. I see the
> approach pushed by dpkg maintainers as fairly conservative with very
> progressive changes to existing packages and much respect for people
> who don't want to a
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:27:41 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Now I am puzzled: 1.4.4~dfsg-4 is in testing. The source package is
> arch-any, but the code fails to build on ia64, sparc and Hurd.
>
> How could srtp enter testing without succesful build on some archs?!?
>
Missing build only p
Hi fellow developers,
I maintain the packaging of SRTP for Debian. I am quite happy that it
finally entered testing.
But today when I wanted to do a minor update to the packaging, I
discovered that my earlier -5 release for some reason hadn't been
uploaded to Debian at all.
Now I am puzzl
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:04:08PM -0500, ceduardo wrote:
> 2010/3/25 Brian Ryans :
> > Quoting ceduardo on 2010-03-18 17:32:27:
> >> What Do you developer tools sugges?
> >
If you use emacs for editing try its integration with gdb for
debugging. I like it.
As a way to manage your source I think
26 matches
Mail list logo
