Hi,
I'm cc'ing debian-devel, so people see that there is an answer. If
whoever wants to continue the discussion, please strongly consider
dropping debian-devel -- the list is noisy enough.
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:06:06PM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I, a maintainer of TeXmacs,
[Harald Braumann]
> See, you don't need a server. You just ship a signature over the hash
> files. Easy as that.
And that signature - if you don't have a server - you probably want to
store it in the .deb, right? So you are going to be editing the .deb
after it is built. At which time, you coul
Le Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:36:24AM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> While I agree in principle with this attempt there might be a lot of
> packages which fit into Science *and* Education section. The sections
> approach in Debian is weak in the way that a package can only be put in
> one sectio
Hi all,
I, a maintainer of TeXmacs, try to make TeXmacs as sane
as possible before squeeze release.
I noticed recently that if one starts Octave plugin under
TeXmacs, it displays an error messages as follows:
-
parse error near line 8 of file
/usr/share/texmacs/TeXmacs/plugins/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, riku.voi...@iki.fi,
dan...@lists.debian-maintainers.org
Package name: logfsprogs
Version:
Upstream Author: Joern Engel
URL: http://logfs.org/
License: GPL
Description: LogFS file sy
Luciano Bello wrote:
> I'm the dsniff[1] maintainer, which is a pretty dead project[2]. Dug
> Song (the upstream) is putting his efforts in rewrite the project in
> python[3], which is quite limited compared to the previous one.
> The question is: should I package this new version as a
Citando Carlos Galisteo :
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Luciano Bello wrote:
The question is: should I package this new version as a replacement
of the previous one, even one there is a big reduction in the feature
list? Or, should I create a new package (let's say, python-dsniff) and
Hey Russ,
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 13:57, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Joey Hess writes:
>> Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> It's also always worth bearing in mind that while a really good
>>> attacker can do all sorts of complex things that make them very hard to
>>> find, most attackers are stupid and straightf
Brian May wrote:
> 2. libgcrypt drops root privileges if called setuid on the assumption
> the only reason the program is setuid root is so it can lock memory.
>
> Unfortunately this breaks every setuid program tat uses PAM when PAM
> is configured to use ldap and ldap is configured to use gnutls,
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonas Smedegaard
* Package name: png++
Version : 0.2.3
Upstream Author : Alex Shulgin
* URL : http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/pngpp/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : C++ interface to the PN
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 08:36:24AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> While I agree in principle with this attempt there might be a lot of
> packages which fit into Science *and* Education section. The sections
> approach in Debian is weak in the way that a package can only be put in
> one section. Th
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:50:59AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Frank Lin PIAT]
> > Please, let's do the easy move *now* for Squeeze, using shasums, and
> > go ahead later with an even better solution.
>
> Drawbacks: more CPU time on build daemons, slightly larger binary
> packages to downl
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 12:52:31PM -0500, Jake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was creating a Debian package and after it install I would like it to
> prompt the user to reboot the computer, is there anyway to do this?
Except in very limited circumstances, there should be no need to reboot
the computer aft
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Luciano Bello wrote:
> The question is: should I package this new version as a replacement
> of the previous one, even one there is a big reduction in the feature
> list? Or, should I create a new package (let's say, python-dsniff) and
> RM dsniff?
As an o
Am 09.03.2010 18:52, schrieb Jake:
Hello,
I was creating a Debian package and after it install I would like it to
prompt the user to reboot the computer, is there anyway to do this?
The right way here is to use debconf for it.
But why should it be needed to reboot the computer after this?
I a
Hello,
I was creating a Debian package and after it install I would like it to
prompt the user to reboot the computer, is there anyway to do this?
Thank You,
Jacob Fernandes
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact list
On Tue, Mar 09 2010, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> On 09/03/2010 14:24, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>
>>
>> It it's that straight forward, please help with the cruft package.
>> Last time I looked (several years ago) it was severly limited by that
>> problem (there not being a way to know which fil
Harald Braumann wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:49:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > It's stupid and straightforward to install /usr/local/bin/ls. debsums
> > will not detect it.
>
> And it's as straightforward to find files which don't belong to any
> package and have some other means in place
[Frank Lin PIAT]
> Please, let's do the easy move *now* for Squeeze, using shasums, and
> go ahead later with an even better solution.
Drawbacks: more CPU time on build daemons, slightly larger binary
packages to download, and some disruption when we're trying to get a
release out the door.
Adva
Please, CC me (my usual account is off-line momentarily)
Hi all,
I'm the dsniff[1] maintainer, which is a pretty dead project[2]. Dug
Song (the upstream) is putting his efforts in rewrite the project in
python[3], which is quite limited compared to the previous one.
The question is
* Peter Samuelson , 2010-03-09, 08:21:
[Frank Lin PIAT]
Why is that everyone seems to move away from MD5?
That's the $64000 question, isn't it? There seems to be this knee-jerk
reaction to all things md5, "OH NOES, MD5 is broken! Therefore it must
be replaced in every possible use, never min
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Fladischer Michael
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: django-picklefield
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Shrubbery Software
* URL : http://github.com/shrubberysoft/django-picklefield
* License
* Harald Braumann [100309 13:59]:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:49:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > It's also always worth bearing in mind that while a really good attacker
> > > can do all sorts of complex things that make them very hard to find, most
> > > attackers are
On 09 Mar 2010 12:33:44 +0100, Alex Muntada wrote:
>
> + Mikhael Goikhman :
>
> > I think README gives a handful of hints about the package. Anyway, in
> > the devel branch (managed under tla, that is mentioned in README too)
> > all tests should now pass even without tla or baz installed.
> > I.
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:49:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
> > It's also always worth bearing in mind that while a really good attacker
> > can do all sorts of complex things that make them very hard to find, most
> > attackers are stupid and straightforward.
>
> It's stupid
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 12:59 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > If we take option 2, SHA256 offers no benefits over MD5 and just takes
> > longer to compute.
[Frank Lin PIAT]
> Why is that everyone seems to move away from MD5?
That's the $64000 question, isn't it? There seems to be this knee-jerk
Brian May writes:
> Or is there another way?
There is the option of changing GnuTLS to use something other than
libgcrypt. There are APIs for doing this dynamically in GnuTLS, and if
that is not sufficient (if you want to avoid linking to libgcrypt
entirely) we could also support e.g. GNU Nettl
On 09/03/2010 14:24, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
>
> It it's that straight forward, please help with the cruft package.
> Last time I looked (several years ago) it was severly limited by that
> problem (there not being a way to know which files should be there and
> which not).
>
> I personally thin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: merlin
Version: 0.6.7~b1
Upstream Author: op5 AB
URL: http://www.op5.org/community/projects/merlin
License: GPL-2
Description: The Merlin project, or Module for Effortless
+ Mikhael Goikhman :
> I think README gives a handful of hints about the package. Anyway, in
> the devel branch (managed under tla, that is mentioned in README too)
> all tests should now pass even without tla or baz installed.
> I.e.: TLA=/bin/false make test
IIRC, having Makefile.PL exit a non
On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 19:57 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Joey Hess writes:
> > Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> >> It's also always worth bearing in mind that while a really good
> >> attacker can do all sorts of complex things that make them very hard to
> >> find, most attackers are stupid and straightf
31 matches
Mail list logo
