Le Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:10:07PM +0100, Benjamin Drung a écrit :
>
> npapi- prefix is not very user friendly. It reminds me of the PCMCIA
> card. xul-plugin- sounds better, but do not fit. The least evil proposal
> was to append -browserplugin. Better suggestions are welcome.
Hi Benjamin,
I th
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:59:04PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Hi -devel,
>
> > The Mozilla extension packaging team decided to use xul-ext- (instead of
> > mozilla-, iceweasel-, etc.) as prefix for all Mozilla extensions [1].
> > This will group the extensions visually. There are currently 1
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:17:19PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > In the meantime, is there consensus that shuffling the development files
> > into
> > /usr/lib/triplet too is at least harmless, and that Multi-Arch: same is
> > appropriate for -dev packages where all the
On Mi, 03 Feb 2010, Norbert Preining wrote:
> > Reupload and it should go through, when the file is complete this
> > time. :)
>
> Done, so let us see if that works now.
Argg...
/maildir-utils_0.6-1_amd64.changes is already present on target host:
maildir-utils_0.6-1_amd64.deb
Either you already
On Mi, 03 Feb 2010, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Because we couldnt parse the changes file -> no mail address -> no mail.
> (dqueued with "Uploaded to localhost" doesnt care and would blindly mail
> everyone if just written in Maintainer:. dak does not)
Very very strange. The upload seems to have been h
> Why didn't I got an email?
Because we couldnt parse the changes file -> no mail address -> no mail.
(dqueued with "Uploaded to localhost" doesnt care and would blindly mail
everyone if just written in Maintainer:. dak does not)
> And the reason is according to this file:
> no signature fo
Hi,
Version 2.26.3 of Graphviz has been uploaded to experimental. This new
version is a significant jump from the existing 2.20 versions in stable
and testing.
The main differences are :
1. libagraph is no longer available - all packages now need to use
libcgraph instead. This should already
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:17:19PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 at 20:46:18 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > > Goswin wrote:
> > >> Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
> > >> and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.
> > > T
Am Dienstag, den 02.02.2010, 21:32 + schrieb brian m. carlson:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:59:04PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> > while we are at it, maybe we could take the opportunity and introduce a
> > similar scheme for all packages providing mozilla-compatible browser
> > plugins as
Hi,
I am wondering whether it is possible to use ucf from a script that is
provided by a package to simplify local changes to a configuration file.
The case I'm thinking of is texconfig, a script in texlive-binaries that
(among other things) allows to set the default paper size for a couple
of ap
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:59:04PM +0100, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> while we are at it, maybe we could take the opportunity and introduce a
> similar scheme for all packages providing mozilla-compatible browser
> plugins as well?
I hope you mean NPAPI[0] plugins, since those will work on non-Gecko
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Carl Chenet
* Package name: clvault
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Tarek Ziade
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/CLVault
* License : PSF
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Command-Line utility to store an
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libgraphics-primitive-driver-cairo-perl
Version : 0.42
Upstream Author : Cory G Watson
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Grap
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Tourneur Henry-Nicolas"
* Package name: tacacs+
Version : 4.0.4.19
Upstream Author : Shrubbery
* URL : http://www.shrubbery.net/tac_plus/
* License : No license, only a copyright file
Programming Lang: C
Description
]] Hendrik Sattler
| Am Dienstag 02 Februar 2010 16:14:27 schrieb Simon McVittie:
| > However, this would also require that pkg-config itself was multiarch or
| > otherwise supported cross-compilation (/usr/bin/i486-linux-gnu-pkg-config,
| > like AC_CHECK_TOOL would use? pkg-config --arch=i486-li
]] Luca Falavigna
| Can you imagine a useful thing that is worth having every entry in
| projectb? If so, here's your chance :)
Searching for CVEs springs to mind. (You can have one which only
affects the version in unstable, in which case it would never hit a
policy queue.)
--
Tollef Fog Hee
]] Simon McVittie
| `pkg-config --debug 2>&1 | grep i486` (on my i386) reveals that pkg-config
| already looks in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/i486-linux-gnu; perhaps it could be made
| to search /usr/lib/TRIPLET/pkgconfig too (hackish version:
| /usr/lib/pkgconfig/TRIPLET could be a symlink there, on Debi
Am Dienstag 02 Februar 2010 16:14:27 schrieb Simon McVittie:
> However, this would also require that pkg-config itself was multiarch or
> otherwise supported cross-compilation (/usr/bin/i486-linux-gnu-pkg-config,
> like AC_CHECK_TOOL would use? pkg-config --arch=i486-linux-gnu? etc.);
> until then
]] Simon McVittie
| In the meantime, is there consensus that shuffling the development files into
| /usr/lib/triplet too is at least harmless, and that Multi-Arch: same is
| appropriate for -dev packages where all the arch-dependent files are in
| arch-specific directories? I'd rather not break f
Package: wnpp
Owner: Maximilian Gass
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libhailo-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Hinrik Örn Sigurðsson
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Hailo/
* License
Hi -devel,
> The Mozilla extension packaging team decided to use xul-ext- (instead of
> mozilla-, iceweasel-, etc.) as prefix for all Mozilla extensions [1].
> This will group the extensions visually. There are currently 18
> extensions that use this naming scheme already. Please rename the binary
Package: wnpp
Owner: Maximilian Gass
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtest-exit-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Andrew Rodland
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Exit/
* License
Package: wnpp
Owner: Maximilian Gass
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libtext-trim-perl
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : Matt Lawrence
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Trim/
* License
Package: wnpp
Owner: Maximilian Gass
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libfile-countlines-perl
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Moritz Lenz
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-CountLines/
*
Package: wnpp
Owner: Maximilian Gass
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libio-interactive-perl
Version : 0.0.6
Upstream Author : Damian Conway
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/IO-Interactive/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Paleino
* Package name: gpsprune
Version : 8
Upstream Author : Tim ...? [0]
* URL : http://activityworkshop.net/software/prune/index.html
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Java
Description : visualize, ed
Marco Nenciarini ha scritto:
> Marco Nenciarini ha scritto:
>> Kai Wasserbäch ha scritto:
>>> Please note: because the next release starts to appear on the horizon and
>>> any
>>> action regarding ossp-uuid would have to be taken before the freeze, I'll
>>> expect
>>> your answer within 20 days (
Mike Hommey wrote:
>
> I have a lintian check that checks most of the policy, except it was
> written before lintian 2.3 and doesn't work anymore. If someone has the
> time to update the script before me, I'll send it to them.
If your plan is to get it into lintian itself (and I wouldn't see any
Package: wnpp
Owner: Jonathan Yu
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: liblayout-manager-perl
Version : 0.31
Upstream Author : Cory G Watson
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Layout-Manager/
* Lic
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010 at 14:22:49 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> You can move headers, the *.so link and static libs. But .pc and .la
> files can not be in the triplet dir yet afaik. So that is a no go for
> now. But if you want you can try and see what changes libtool and
> pkgconfig would nee
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 07:59:53AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 02/02/10 at 01:07 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > At any rate, here are some facts:
> > - A package that builds differently because something is (or is not)
> > installed on the build system is buggy. Period. It has nothing to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Ondřej Surý"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: libhsm
Version : 1.0.0~rc3
Upstream Author : Alex Dalitz, Jakob Schlyter, Rickard Bellgrim, Jelte
Jansen, Sion Lloyd
* URL : http://www.opendnssec.org
Simon McVittie writes:
> On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 at 20:46:18 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> > Goswin wrote:
>> >> Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
>> >> and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.
>> >
>> > The -dev package has no Multi-Arch field
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> 2010/2/2 Mike Hommey :
> > On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla extensions.
> >>
> >> Source package name
> >> ===
2010/2/2 Mike Hommey :
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla extensions.
>>
>> Source package name
>> ===
>>
>> The source package name for extension should not contain the name of the
On Tue, 02 Feb 2010, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Couldn't the following be implemented, maybe as some C++ mode of
> dpkg-gensymbols?
> - Instead of mangled symbol names, source packages should ship demangled
> symbol
> files. This way, package maintainers could truly inspect those lists of
>
On Mo, Feb 01, 2010 at 20:37:57 (CET), Bill Allombert wrote:
> or manage to convince xdg-utils upstream to provide xdg-su instead of
> asking everyone to switch to policykit ?
Is xdg-utils actually maintained upstream? Last time I looked, it seemed
to me the last freedesktop project that has not
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:00:46AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> vedran.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
> >Package: wnpp
> >Severity: wishlist
> >X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> >
> >A small, high performance http and ftp server
> >
> > Package name: gatling
> >Version: latest
> >Up
* Steve McIntyre :
> Do we really need another ftp server or another http server? What
> makes this any better than the other alternatives?
* Small! (125k static Linux-x86 binary with HTTP, FTP and SMB support)
* Fast! (measure for yourself, please)
* Scalable! (see this document, measured using
On Di, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:04:04 (CET), Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> I guess the facilities to mangle/demangle are there, I just don't know
> whether they are accessible from the command line.
cf. c++filt(1)
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
vedran.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
>Package: wnpp
>Severity: wishlist
>X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
>A small, high performance http and ftp server
>
> Package name: gatling
>Version: latest
>Upstream Author: Felix von Leitner
>URL: http://www.fefe.de/gatling
>
Hi Bill,
We need a solution that still works if user enable root password and disable
sudo after installation. Shadow will note tell you whether root has a password
or not. Maybe menu should have a debconf question (do you use sudo ?) that will
be prefilled by d-i. Technical advices and patches
Hi all,
With the recent upload of diagnostics I've again been bitten by dpkg-gensymbols
[1]. As you might notice, the symbol is/was there, just the mangling scheme
seems to have changed. For one, the next upload will be the third upload just to
fix changed symbol names on alpha. One could argue th
On Di, 02 Feb 2010, Luk Claes wrote:
> The upload was rejected as you can see on merkel in
> /srv/ftp.debian.org/queue/rejected/*.reason
Why didn't I got an email?
And the reason is according to this file:
no signature found in maildir-utils_0.6-1_amd64.changes.
But:
$ gpg --verify maild
44 matches
Mail list logo
