Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On 02/02/2010 03:37, Norbert Preining wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> can someone explain me how to track down a lost upload? Yesterday I
>> uploaded maildir-util 0.6-1 and got the email
>> Uploaded successfully
>> but since then nothing has happened, and I don't see it
On 02/02/2010 03:37, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> can someone explain me how to track down a lost upload? Yesterday I
> uploaded maildir-util 0.6-1 and got the email
> Uploaded successfully
> but since then nothing has happened, and I don't see it in the archive,
> in the "to b
On 02/02/10 at 01:07 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> At any rate, here are some facts:
> - A package that builds differently because something is (or is not)
> installed on the build system is buggy. Period. It has nothing to do
> with the build system, it's the package.
... but I question tha
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:34:31PM +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla extensions.
>
> Source package name
> ===
>
> The source package name for extension should not contain the name of the
> enhanced application. These
Hi everyone,
can someone explain me how to track down a lost upload? Yesterday I
uploaded maildir-util 0.6-1 and got the email
Uploaded successfully
but since then nothing has happened, and I don't see it in the archive,
in the "to be installed", in the NEW queue, qa system.
Is there some
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: kcm-touchpad
Version: 0.3.1
Upstream Author: [Michał Żarłok]
URL: [http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php?content=113335]
License: [GPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
A small, high performance http and ftp server
Package name: gatling
Version: latest
Upstream Author: Felix von Leitner
URL: http://www.fefe.de/gatling
License: GPL
Description: a small
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: kgmailnotifier
Version: 0.5.1-1
Upstream Author: [Marcel Hasler ]
URL: [http://www.kde-
apps.org/content/show.php/KGmailNotifier?content=5537
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:37:48PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 20/01/10 at 00:48 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 02:22:33PM +1300, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >
> > > Why spend a lot of time on tasks that provide little benefit, and also
> > > some disadvantages (in some
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 at 20:46:18 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Goswin wrote:
> >> Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
> >> and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.
> >
> > The -dev package has no Multi-Arch field, which seems to be how the
> >
[This isn't really on topic for -user or -devel; please send followup
mail to me privately or to debian-events...@lists.debian.org. I'm only
sending it to those lists to get a wider audience than -events-na.]
Debian has a booth at the SCALE 8x conference in Los Angeles at the
Westin LAX from the 2
Benjamin Drung wrote the following on 01.02.2010 21:50
Thanks both Benjamin and James for your replys.
I gone a live with it.
--
bye Thilo
4096R/0xC70B1A8F
721B 1BA0 095C 1ABA 3FC6 7C18 89A4 A2A0 C70B 1A8F
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 15:48 -0500 schrieb James Vega:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Thilo Six wrote:
> > Benjamin Drung wrote the following on 01.02.2010 20:34
> >> icedove-quotecolors
> >
> > 2nd question:
> > In the good old days (when ever these were) someone like a short sighted
> > p
Am Montag, den 01.02.2010, 21:34 +0100 schrieb Thilo Six:
> Question 1:
> You propose to use the prefix "xul-ext-" which is more generic i guess but
> the itself is called "pkg-mozext".
> Is that "moz" in the team name for historic reasons?
Yes, it's only for historic reasons.
> Or is it planed t
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Thilo Six wrote:
> Benjamin Drung wrote the following on 01.02.2010 20:34
>> icedove-quotecolors
>
> 2nd question:
> In the good old days (when ever these were) someone like a short sighted
> person like me could search via apt or aptitude for *compatible* extention
Hi,
FTP team and I are currently writing a new feature in dak which will
collect changelog entries and store them in projectb, to be later used
for other purposes (e.g. to write point release changelogs, see [1]).
Collecting every changelog entry takes lots of space (the whole past
adds up to 7GB
Benjamin Drung wrote the following on 01.02.2010 20:34
Hello
I would like to ask 2 question as user regarding your proposal.
-- --
> Binary package name
> ===
>
> The Mozilla extension packaging team decided to use xul-ext- (instead of
> mozilla-, iceweasel-, etc.) as prefix
Simon McVittie writes:
> (Please cc me on this thread, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel.)
>
> Goswin wrote:
>> Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
>> and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.
>
> The -dev package has no Multi-Arch field, which seems
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:30:23PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> gdp, by default, invokes dpkg to install the generated .deb
> file.
>
> > I’ve been asking to move su-to-root to xdg-utils or
> > debianutils, but the situation is still stuck.
>
> That sounds sensible. Is there anything I can do to
Hi,
This mail targets all developers, which maintain Mozilla extensions.
Source package name
===
The source package name for extension should not contain the name of the
enhanced application. These prefixes should be dropped from the source
name:
firefox-
iceape-
icedove-
icewea
* Daniel Jacobowitz:
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 12:42:46AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I've built a small proof-of-concept library which creates Java-style
>> tracebacks for C and C++ programs. In contrast to libc's backtrace()
>> function, it uses DWARF debugging information when available, s
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 02:54:07AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 24.01.2010 00:39, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > Package: policykit-1
> > Version: 0.96-1
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > policykit-1 supports specifying permissions for groups, not just
> > individual users.
> >
> > Thus, please consid
(Please cc me on this thread, I'm not subscribed to debian-devel.)
Goswin wrote:
> Looks fine from here. How does your -dev package look? The .so link, .la
> and .pc files (if any) are specifically important.
The -dev package has no Multi-Arch field, which seems to be how the multiarch
spec on th
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the apt-xapian-index package.
What I would like is a comaintainer who takes care of the everday
packaging chores (for example, testing and applying the patch for
#547074 and fixing #562078).
I am looking for someone who already
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request assistance with maintaining the debtags package.
What I would like is a comaintainer who takes care of the everday
packaging chores (for example, redoing the fetch script to fix #481634
and #478590, or fixing the manpage in #542525).
I am looking for some
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Hello,
Asheesh Laroia wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010, Remi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Hello,
I request assistance with maintaining the miredo package.
The last update has unfortunately introduced a severe reg
26 matches
Mail list logo
