Le Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 04:02:27AM +0300, Ivan Borzenkov a écrit :
>
> Examples
>
> amarok (parent:-, application)
> amarok-common (parent:amapok, hide)
> amarok-utils (parent:amapok, hide)
>
> amarok
> ---
> psi-plis (parent:-, application
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I have lost interest in this package, and I don't think the other
co-maintainers have contributed at all in the past few years.
This package is still widely used, and I think this deserves better
looking-after.
I'm asking for adoption of dpatch package.
regards,
On 2009-12-26, Luk Claes wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 23:43:44 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>>> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
And it seems to be staying like this.
I'm not sure when this happened, but apt
Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 23:43:44 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>
>> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>>> It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
>>> And it seems to be staying like this.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure when this happened, but apt used to be
>>> build-essential=y
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 23:43:44 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> >
> > It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
> > And it seems to be staying like this.
> >
> > I'm not sure when this happened, but apt used to be
> > build-essential=yes but now it's not.
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
> And it seems to be staying like this.
>
> I'm not sure when this happened, but apt used to be
> build-essential=yes but now it's not.
Are you saying that build-essential=yes was still in use?
It also look
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:08:31 +0900
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
with or by debootstrap?
works for me with plain 'sudo debootstrap sid debian/'
I: Retrieving Release
I: Retrieving Packages
I: Validating Packages
I: Resolving dependencies of
It seems like apt is not installed with debootstrap anymore.
And it seems to be staying like this.
I'm not sure when this happened, but apt used to be
build-essential=yes but now it's not.
At Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:53:54 +0100,
Soeren Sonnenburg wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Wed, 2009-12-23 at 15:28 +0
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Iustin Pop
* Package name: ganeti-htools
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Iustin Pop
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/ganeti/
* License : GPL2
Programming Lang: Haskell
Description : Cluster tools for Ganeti
Th
On 2009-12-26, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
>> Does that mean your application only works if the kernel supports
>> IPv6?
> Why would you want to disable basic IPv6 support?
People opt to not have IPv6 support in the kernel because they don't need it,
they don't want accidentally get out through IPv6 j
Am Samstag 26 Dezember 2009 03:43:08 schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 12:47:45PM +0100, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> > I have failures now with a client that cannot connect() to the IPv4
> > address but get an ENETUNREACH instead.
> > The application DOES set this socket option:
> > socke
retitle 542602 ntp: Should ntp update clock before or after the syslog
collector starts?
retitle 417118 "event based boot system needed to solve use cases"
pere, isnt #417118 solved by dependency booting?
h01ger: nope. it is one of the problems that need event based boot to
work.
when do you
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 542602 ntp: Should ntp update clock before or after the syslog
> collector starts?
Bug #542602 [ntp] "event based boot system needed to solve use cases"
Changed Bug title to 'ntp: Should ntp update clock before or after the syslog
collec
Josselin Mouette writes:
> it’s been a long-standing tradition on Linux to have 6 started getty
> processes, in tty1 to tty6. However this doesn’t correspond anymore to
> the way we use our machines.
> * I don’t think we need more than 2 of these. They are still
> useful for server
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 01:29:48AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 11:51:35PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > What would be a step forward:
> > - Make any code PIC, including binaries (PIE) and static libs.
> static libs would need to be PIE, not PIC.
The differences between PI
Ivan Borzenkov writes:
> This document covers very useful improvement of Debian apt system - the
> package hierarchy system. This system can help end user make it's difficult
> choice which packet he have to install. The main feature is to hide
> unnecessary packages to concentrate user's attention
16 matches
Mail list logo
