On Fri, 06 Nov 2009, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:44:31AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > As I received a couple of bug reports today about packages FTBFS, I
> > installed
> > binutils-gold and tried to compile a few of my packages with it.
> >
> > What I noticed is, that every
On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 12:44:31AM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> As I received a couple of bug reports today about packages FTBFS, I installed
> binutils-gold and tried to compile a few of my packages with it.
>
> What I noticed is, that every package with symbols file, produced a lintian
> error,
reassign 554694 qt4-qmake
retitle 554694 qt4-qmake generates a makefile which is incompatible with
binutils-gold
thanks
Hi, Peter.
Goldendict are built by qt4-qmake. I think that You should report
about such projects in qt4-qmake package, because just qt4-qmake
generates linker call command. I t
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 670 (new: 64)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 154 (new: 4)
Total number of packages reques
As I received a couple of bug reports today about packages FTBFS, I installed
binutils-gold and tried to compile a few of my packages with it.
What I noticed is, that every package with symbols file, produced a lintian
error, as binutils-gold added new symbols, the most common one was
e...@base
W
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> I assume the goal is to imply both "i've read it" and "i approve it"
> with a single header, right?
Yes.
> Since i know of no single word for this, i'd be fine with explicitly
> stating that is the intent in DEP-3 description of the Reviewed-By
>
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> [ moving to -devel from a private discussion to have more feedback ]
>
> Daniel was asking me how several unstructured paragraphs are supposed to
> be treated for the Description field. I told him that the description is
> the concatenation
On 11/05/2009 04:44 PM, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> It has an implicit meaning of approval yes. If the review was negative, it
> should not be added or it should be clarified in the Description what the
> reviewer's comments were (always a good idea).
>
> Proposition of patches welcome. Please search
[ moving to -devel from a private discussion to have more feedback ]
Daniel was asking me how several unstructured paragraphs are supposed to
be treated for the Description field. I told him that the description is
the concatenation of all of them. Do other people agree with Daniel that
the points
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Bernd Zeimetz writes:
>
>> Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>>> If you maintain a debian package that directly uses libtiff or if you
>>> maintain software that uses libtiff, it would be a great help if you
>>> could test your packages against the version of libtiff in experime
Bernd Zeimetz writes:
> Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>> If you maintain a debian package that directly uses libtiff or if you
>> maintain software that uses libtiff, it would be a great help if you
>> could test your packages against the version of libtiff in experimental,
>> 4.0.0~beta4. If you find a
11 matches
Mail list logo
