On Saturday 20 June 2009 03:16:33 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Joseph Rawson writes:
> > On Friday 19 June 2009 12:57:25 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >> Or have a proxy that adds packages that are requested.
> >
> > When I woke up this morning, I was thinking that it might be interesting
> > to
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> All I see here is that the tools should be able to extract the information
> from the changelog, which often includes a bug number and other bits of
> information.
I would say the opposite. Once you have created your patch you should be
able to do ˝dc
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi schrieb:
> [I posted this on debian-gcc before. I have not gotten any reply there. So I
> am trying my luck here]
>
> Currently the default gfortran in Debian Sid points to 4:4.3.3-9 . The
> gfortran-4.4 is already available, quite stable. Is there any reason why
> gfortran 4
clone 533642 -1
reassign -1 libgcc1 1:4.4.0-7
retitle -1 Ensure __aeabi_* symbols are listed in libgcc1.symbols for armel
severity -1 important
thanks
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> I think that to properly resolve my issue I have to allow you to export
> those blacklisted symbols i
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > Under normal curcumstances, I'd expect every shared library and application
> > to
> > require __aeabi_* from libgcc. Under normal circumstances these will come
> > from
> > libgcc_s.so, but if you link with --static-libgcc then you'll get your ow
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Krzysztof Burghardt
* Package name: rabbitsign
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Benjamin Moody
* URL : http://www.ticalc.org/archives/files/fileinfo/383/38392.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description :
[2009-06-19 17:38] Raphael Hertzog
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, markus schnalke wrote:
> >
> > during the installation of `geda' on sid, I received following output:
> >
> > [...]
> > Setting up gawk (1:3.1.6.dfsg-3) ...
> > update-alternatives: error: alternative nawk can't be slave of awk: it is a
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 12:44:12PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> * debian/patches/fix_typo.patch:
> Fix typo in the main menu: s/setings/settings
> I would actually be duplicating the description (the patch name being the
> short description, and the changelog entry
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> Have you tried to write the field for your cases? The spec is relatively
> light-weight even if it tries to support the more complicated case too.
Yes, and the examples I mentioned are/were real cases.
>
> Description: Fix typo
> Origin: vendor
> Forwarded: yes
The t
David Paleino writes:
> On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:04:32 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> Also, going back to the note about reputation; There's no reason
>> reputation can't be associated with a pseudonym or with a GPG key
>> attached to a pseudonym.
>
> How do you sign such a key? You'd break the w
Any of you who are TIVO hackers & Debianistas; please contact me via
e-mail off the lists. If you reply on the list I will not see it as
freakin GMail scrubs the replies with my name in the header. That's a
whole other issue. I am starting a personal project to design a process
for using Debian to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xfpt
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : Philip Hazel
License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : generate XML from plain text
xfpt is a program that reads a file of plain text that contains
relatively simple m
Tell Mee How to Taalk Dirty to My Boyfriend (wwwmeds45 com)
Goot Rhythm? Animals Doo Too
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 10:21:04AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> la, 2009-06-20 kello 08:56 +0200, David Paleino kirjoitti:
> > Is material copyrightable under a nickname, instead of a realname?
>
> Yes, in all jurisdictions I am aware of. It's called a pseudonym and
> tends to be explicitly reco
Hi,
I'm thinking about changing the way piuparts outputs results. At the
moment it outputs a log file that contains everything it does, and
buried deep in that is the test results. This tends to work badly.
I have some ideas for how things should work, but before I start working
on them, I'd like
On Sat Jun 20 10:19, David Paleino wrote:
> > Also, going back to the note about reputation; There's no reason
> > reputation can't be associated with a pseudonym or with a GPG key
> > attached to a pseudonym.
>
> How do you sign such a key? You'd break the web of trust, if you don't check
> at
>
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:04:32 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Sat Jun 20 09:28, David Paleino wrote:
> > Now that I read Ben's mail again, I see that his concern is also about the
> > Maintainer field. I suppose that should be a real name too then? Or is it ok
> > having a pseudonym because it's
Joseph Rawson writes:
> On Friday 19 June 2009 12:57:25 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> Or have a proxy that adds packages that are requested.
> When I woke up this morning, I was thinking that it might be interesting to
> have an apt method that talks directly to reprepro. It's just a vague ide
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> I mean, often the patch name already says enough about it, at times patches
> are just trivial (a typo fix doesn't need four or five lines to be
> described), at times they are forwarded as soon as the new package is
> uploaded, at times they are $VCS
On Sat Jun 20 09:28, David Paleino wrote:
> Now that I read Ben's mail again, I see that his concern is also about the
> Maintainer field. I suppose that should be a real name too then? Or is it ok
> having a pseudonym because it's the sponsor taking responsibility for
> the upload? (given that usi
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Ben Finney wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes:
>
> > Merging all those ideas, I suggest we drop Status/Commit/Patch and use
> > the following format:
> >
> > Origin: :
>
> I'd still suggest having the extra information optional in the case of
> anything but “other”:
>
>
On Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:21:04 +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> la, 2009-06-20 kello 08:56 +0200, David Paleino kirjoitti:
> > Is material copyrightable under a nickname, instead of a realname?
>
> Yes, in all jurisdictions I am aware of. It's called a pseudonym and
> tends to be explicitly recognize
la, 2009-06-20 kello 08:56 +0200, David Paleino kirjoitti:
> Is material copyrightable under a nickname, instead of a realname?
Yes, in all jurisdictions I am aware of. It's called a pseudonym and
tends to be explicitly recognized by copyright laws.
The history of literature is full of people wri
23 matches
Mail list logo
