Re: Let’s turn DEP5 into something useful

la, 2009-06-13 kello 10:52 +0200, Josselin Mouette kirjoitti: > So, how about dropping entirely anything that’s related to files and > only keep the amount of information we are requiring now? I feel sorry > for the giant bikeshedding thread about spaces and commas, but it is not > getting us anyw

ITP: haskell-uniplate -- A Haskell library for uniform type generic traversals

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Erik de Castro Lopo * Package name: haskell-uniplate Version : 1.2.0.3 Upstream Author : Neil Mitchell * URL : http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/uniplate * License : BSD Programming Lang: Ha

Bug#533112: ITP: libhimd -- Libraries for accessing Sony HiMD MiniDisc Walkman (not to be confused with NetMD and libnetmd)

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Adrian Glaubitz * Package name: libhimd Version : 0.0.1 Upstream Author : Adrian Glaubitz * URL : https://wiki.physik.fu-berlin.de/linux-minidisc/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : Libraries for

Re: Bug#526489: Time to orphan eclipse? (Bug#526489: eclipse: should this package be orphaned?)

On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 01:40:49AM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote: > > I filed the quoted report almost 3 weeks ago. Resending to people listed as > eclipse uploaders in case they did not get it. > Third and last warning, I will orphan eclipse next saturday (20th June), so if somebody from the Java te

Re: Re-enter a package previously dropped ?

At Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:35:51 +0200, Eike Sauer wrote: > > [1 ] > Hello! > > Am Sonntag, 14. Juni 2009 schrieb Xavier Maillard: > > Concerning my ITP, is it alright ? I mean, is it good practice to > > put a previously dropped package into Debian again ? > > The reasons given for dropping the pa

Suspend to RAM breaks xorg in lenny (cornercase?)

Hello, I am running lenny and when I suspend to RAM (with kpowersave) I cannot start a second X server running in parallel to the first one anymore. Before the suspend that works flawless. I am posting to debian-devel to get some guidance which package is the right one for a bugreport. What I

Re: DEP-5: Please clarify the meaning of "same licence and share copyright holders"

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:36:43PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Like I say, it's about the impression you're creating. You say these > things but the fact that you're using this formal Debian-wide process > says something different. The whole thing comes over very differently > to "here's something

Re: DEP-5: Please clarify the meaning of "same licence and share copyright holders"

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:16:48PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:02:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > I think you're missing the point here; my point is that one of the goals of > > pushing this through as a DEP comes over as being about greatly increasing > > the > > pre

Bug#533080: ITP: kcollectd -- Small applications that allows to view rrd datacollections

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: M G Berberich Package name: kcollectd Version : 0.8 Upstream Author : M G Berberich URL : http://www.forwiss.uni-passau.de/~berberic/Linux/kcollectd.html License : GPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : S

Re: DEP-5: Please clarify the meaning of "same licence and share copyright holders"

On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 04:02:49PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > I think you're missing the point here; my point is that one of the goals of > pushing this through as a DEP comes over as being about greatly increasing the > pressure on people to adopt it. I don't know what gives you that impression.

Re: DEP-5: Please clarify the meaning of "same licence and share copyright holders"

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 03:03:28PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 12:28:59PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > It feels like half the problem here is that making it a DEP feels much > > more like something that's being pushed to everyone. If it were going > > through a similar p

Bug#533070: ITP: libconstantine-java -- Platform constants for Java

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Nicolas Duboc * Package name: libconstantine-java Version : 0.4 Upstream Author : JRuby project (Wayne Meissner in particular) * URL : http://kenai.com/projects/constantine * License : MIT Programming Lang: Java Descr

Re: Let’ s turn DEP5 into something useful

> Nowhere does it make any mention of source filenames. > > Now please drop that shit from your proposal, and maybe we can discuss > it sanely without counting commas. I am all for making all the fields optional. This is a major change from Sam‘s original proposal. The reason it has not been don

Re: Re-enter a package previously dropped ?

Hello! Am Sonntag, 14. Juni 2009 schrieb Xavier Maillard: > Concerning my ITP, is it alright ? I mean, is it good practice to > put a previously dropped package into Debian again ? The reasons given for dropping the package were: * Package is out of date. * Upstream appears inactive since 2003. *

Bug#533049: ITP: eclipse-l10n-japanese-3.5.0

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pkg-java-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Package name: eclipse-l10n-japanese-3.5.0 Version: 20090423085802-1 Upstream Author: The Eclipse Foundation URL: http://babel.

Re: Let’s turn DEP5 into something useful

Le samedi 13 juin 2009 à 23:25 +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Le Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:52:36AM +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > > > > So, how about dropping entirely anything that’s related to files and > > only keep the amount of information we are requiring now? I feel sorry > > for the

PROBLEMES DE CREDITS?

Vous avez l'impression d ene travailler que pour rembourser vos crédits? Avez vous pensé au regroupement de crédits? Propriétaires où locataires, fichés où non Consultez mon site http://www.creditenregion.fr Complétez une demande en ligne Je vous répondrai rapidement et n'oubliez pas que: Auc

Re-enter a package previously dropped ?

Hi, a bit late but thank you for you links. Concerning my ITP, is it alright ? I mean, is it good practice to put a previously dropped package into Debian again ? As said, I am the new maintainer and I fixed many small bugs thus making it a lot more stable than it was before. I am also offering