On Wed, Apr 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
> I've changed the wrapper of ucf to do nothing and pass full control
> over to ucf until enable_ucf_wrapper is set to yes in
> /etc/etcgit.conf. This isn't set by default, so after installation of
> the package the user has to enable the wrapper manually.
Hi Romain (and others)
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:23:24 am Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:52:48 Raphael Geissert, vous avez écrit :
> > > I gave this example precisely because mediawiki upstream release
> > > management is one of the most serious I know in webapps. And even
> >
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 18:52:48 Raphael Geissert, vous avez écrit :
> > I gave this example precisely because mediawiki upstream release
> > management is one of the most serious I know in webapps. And even though
> > they fix issues with care, and their code is surely very good, then this
> >
Marc-André Lureau writes:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> Marc-Andre Lureau writes:
>>
>>> Vtg tries to make less compromises as possible so, for now, its scope
>>> is narrowed only to support the Vala programming language.
>>
>> I don't understand the phrase "less comp
>>> * Package name : vtg
>>> Description : Vala Toys for gEdit
>> The package name doesn’t sound really helpful. How about something like
>> gedit-plugins-vala?
> I fully agree. However, upstream name is vtg. I am not familiar with
> policy about upstream package name, and whether we can
[Don't CC me, thanks]
Romain Beauxis wrote:
> Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 12:35:12 Raphael Geissert, vous avez écrit :
>
> I think you have a wrong view, probably due to the fact that you don't
> maintain or develop webapps (I might be wrong, please apologize in this
> case).
I do not maintain a
Hi Ben,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Marc-Andre Lureau writes:
>
>> Vtg tries to make less compromises as possible so, for now, its scope
>> is narrowed only to support the Vala programming language.
>
> I don't understand the phrase "less compromises as possible".
> Cou
Hi Manoj,
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 22 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 21 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
>>
>> Right, but when I hook into apt-get, I can get the config
Marc-Andre Lureau writes:
> Vtg tries to make less compromises as possible so, for now, its scope
> is narrowed only to support the Vala programming language.
I don't understand the phrase "less compromises as possible".
Could you rephrase it?
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
--
To UNSUBS
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marc-Andre Lureau"
* Package name: gtksourcecompletion
Version : 0.5.2
Upstream Author : Jesús Barbero Rodríguez
* URL : http://gtksourcecomple.sourceforge.net
* License : LGPL 3
Programming Lang: C
Description
Hi Josselin,
2009/4/23 Josselin Mouette :
> Le mercredi 22 avril 2009 à 23:19 +0300, Marc-Andre Lureau a écrit :
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: "Marc-Andre Lureau"
>>
>> * Package name : vtg
>> Description : Vala Toys for gEdit
>
> The package name doesn’t sound really
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 22 avril 2009 à 13:15 -0600, w...@icecavern.net a écrit :
>> Current situation (source package => binary packages):
>> gringotts => gringotts
>> libgringotts => libgringotts2, libgringotts-dev
>>
>> Desired situation:
>> gringotts => gringotts, libgringotts2, l
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009 à 23:19 +0300, Marc-Andre Lureau a écrit :
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Marc-Andre Lureau"
>
> * Package name: vtg
> Description : Vala Toys for gEdit
The package name doesn’t sound really helpful. How about something like
gedit-plugins-vala?
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009 à 13:15 -0600, w...@icecavern.net a écrit :
> Current situation (source package => binary packages):
> gringotts => gringotts
> libgringotts => libgringotts2, libgringotts-dev
>
> Desired situation:
> gringotts => gringotts, libgringotts2, libgringotts-dev
Simple: upload
Le mercredi 22 avril 2009 à 14:50 -0400, David Nusinow a écrit :
> This says far more about the disadvantages to our stable release policy
> than it does about hal or any other specific piece of software in the
> release.
And actually this is simply untrue. I’ve seen similar fixes accepted in
po
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:11:16PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Hi Guido,
>
> Guido Günther wrote:
> > Due to some unforeseen circumstances the number of participants was
> > quiet low (3) this year an we hope to see more of you next year around.
>
> At least me or probably some more people from
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Marc-Andre Lureau"
* Package name: vtg
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : Andrea Del Signore
* URL : http://vtg.googlecode.com/
* License : GPL v2+, LGPL v2.1
Programming Lang: Vala
Description : Vala Toys for gE
Am Mittwoch 22 April 2009 18:21:01 schrieb Roger Leigh:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:59:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20 2009, Roger Leigh wrote:
> > > I was horrified to discover in the last few weeks that Emacs now
> > > also defaults to ~/Documents when you start it up, mak
Hi Guido,
Guido Günther wrote:
> Due to some unforeseen circumstances the number of participants was
> quiet low (3) this year an we hope to see more of you next year around.
At least me or probably some more people from credativ would have been there for
sure - but where was this meeting announc
Russ Allbery (22/04/2009):
> Yeah, absolutely. Could you file a bug against debian-policy so that I
> don't lose track of this before I get a chance to do it?
Sure. #525190 (-policy received the bugreport, dropping it; adding the
initial bugreport).
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Cyril Brulebois writes:
> can we please get rid of that obsolete version requirement?
>
> More reasons in <20090421162239.gb26...@debian.org>:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/04/msg00792.html
>
> (Contacting -policy since that's the address given at the bottom of the
> perl-policy p
Hi folks,
What's the current best-practice for merging two source packages?
Technically making the merged source package is quite simple. However, I'm
not sure what needs to happen in what order so that the transition can be
made without breaking the existing packages in the archive.
I'm interes
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>Michael Biebl wrote:
>> It makes no measurable difference here on my laptop (nx7000) running Debian
>> Lenny.
>
>ok, this confirm also Matthew Garrett analysis, and it is good.
>But so why powertop reccomend to disable pooling?
powertop makes various recommendations
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
No, users should file bugs if their HW is broken so that those can be
blacklisted too.
Are you joking?
For one year that user could not use debian stable?
This says far more about the disadvantages to our stable release policy
tha
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>>> Michael Biebl wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> For these two reason (power and security), I think Debian should offer
> a debconf question, (medium priority), about disabling pooling.
>
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 12:35:12 Raphael Geissert, vous avez écrit :
> [Dropping -release and -volatile]
>
> Jan Wagner wrote:
> > Hi Romain,
> >
> > On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> >> However, I wonder if this would need yet another archive, or just an
> >> update of a polic
Roger Leigh dijo [Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 03:49:54PM +0100]:
> > How shall I answer that?
> > I know that I myself use auto-mounting extensively and also don't expect my
> > father to type someting like "mount /dev/hdc /mnt/cdrom"
>
> Absolutely, but this is a separate issue. You can still, in any d
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> No, users should file bugs if their HW is broken so that those can be
>> blacklisted too.
>
> Are you joking?
> For one year that user could not use debian stable?
>
> BTW for one reported bug, there are 10 unreported bugs.
> I try ha
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Michael Biebl wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
For these two reason (power and security), I think Debian should offer
a debconf question, (medium priority), about disabling pooling.
Sorry, but this is certainly not going to happen.
Wh
Michael Biebl wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
Michael Biebl wrote:
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Michael Biebl wrote:
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:52:41PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Roger Leigh wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:55:15PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
hal does
Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>>
>>> For these two reason (power and security), I think Debian should offer
>>> a debconf question, (medium priority), about disabling pooling.
>>
>> Sorry, but this is certainly not going to happen.
>
> Why not? Is
Michael Biebl wrote:
Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
For these two reason (power and security), I think Debian should offer
a debconf question, (medium priority), about disabling pooling.
Sorry, but this is certainly not going to happen.
Why not? Is it so bad to give user a choice?
The blackli
[Dropping -release and -volatile]
Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Romain,
>
> On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>> However, I wonder if this would need yet another archive, or just an
>> update of a policy, either in backports.org or volatile..
>
> DUNNO for volatile, but the ftp-master
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:59:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20 2009, Roger Leigh wrote:
>
>
> > I was horrified to discover in the last few weeks that Emacs now
> > also defaults to ~/Documents when you start it up, making you
> > delete the useless Documents before you can ac
Hi Romain,
On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Romain Beauxis wrote:
> However, I wonder if this would need yet another archive, or just an update
> of a policy, either in backports.org or volatile..
DUNNO for volatile, but the ftp-master of bpo, which is actually doing the
main work clarified, that don
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
And this is like 6 lines of Pseudo code, and less in compact
languages like Perl. A fairly trivial exercise in basic CS logic.
Please do not insist on the number of lines. I mentioned in my
mail [1] that you need a bit more. I did not said
On Tue, Apr 21 2009, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
>
>> So long as we have an implementation which works for the vast majority
>> of cases we can file bugs to make it work for the few cases where it
>> doesn't. (Or the output can just be slightly broken in those
Hi !
Le Wednesday 22 April 2009 09:07:58 Jan Wagner, vous avez écrit :
> > I've requested a slot at DebConf to discuss this into detail, though
> > feel free to start a discussion already on debian-devel.
>
> sorry for coming around with another issue. While reading your comment
> without
On Wed, Apr 22 2009, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:36:31PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>> No. Adding blank lines before lists is also required.
>
> ... so, agreed. The extra price to pay to use Markdown would be that
> additional line insertion.
And this is lik
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brian Cassidy
* Package name: libdbix-class-dynamicdefault-perl
Version : 0.03
Upstream Author : Florian Ragwitz
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault/
* License : Artistic | GPL-1+
Programming
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brian Cassidy
* Package name: libtime-warp-perl
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Joshua Nathaniel Pritiki
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-Warp/
* License : Artistic | GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl, XS
Descri
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Brian Cassidy
* Package name: libdbix-class-timestamp-perl
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : J. Shirley
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Class-TimeStamp/
* License : Artistic | GPL-1+
Programming Lang: Perl
D
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:13:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> > Michael Biebl wrote:
> > powertop encourages to disable polling, so it is a big point.
>
> I agree with you in general, but I doubt polling every 2 or 16 seconds will
> make
> any significant differen
Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
> For these two reason (power and security), I think Debian should offer
> a debconf question, (medium priority), about disabling pooling.
Sorry, but this is certainly not going to happen.
The blacklist for faulty drives on the other hand, installed by default, might
ind
(No need to Cc me if you keep -devel in the loop.)
gregor herrmann (21/04/2009):
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:22:39 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > > > > libdbd-sqlite3-perl (>= 1.14), libdbi-perl (>= 1.51), perl (>=
> > > > > 5.6.0-12)
> > > >
Charles Plessy (22/04/2009):
> I try to refresh my control and rules files with latest versions of
> dh-make-perl when I upload new upstream releases. Be sure that this
> depenancy will be removed after the patches that you will send to the
> Policy and to dh-make-perl will be accepted.
Contacted
Nick Leverton (22/04/2009):
> Thanks for your interest in my IT(re)P and your comments.
No problem.
> Of the stated reasons for removal:
>
> > | Please remove unicorn:
> > | - mostly unused (2 in popcon for the binary package unicorn)
>
> The unicorn binary package contains ancillary utils whi
Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>
> Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
>>> Michael Biebl wrote:
Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:52:41PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Roger Leigh wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 03:55:15PM +0200, Michael Biebl wr
Hi Luk,
On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
> Bart Martens wrote:
> > I have updated bug report 457291 "flashplugin-nonfree: decision
> > 2007-12-21: keep this package out of stable starting with lenny".
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457291
> >
> > I hereby invite y
Stefano Zacchiroli writes:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:36:31PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > No. Adding blank lines before lists is also required.
>
> ... so, agreed. The extra price to pay to use Markdown would be that
> additional line insertion.
FWIW, the use of reST as a format specifi
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:32:27AM +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> Just did it on another machine with libgdal1-1.5, but I need this support
> for libgdal1-1.4* on another one.
> Does gdal-ecw plugin works for previous gdal releases?
>
No, you need to change a bit patches for that,
and anyway if
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Don Armstrong wrote:
There's no point to defining rules without a working implementation,
because we don't know what the rules should be.
So I tried to do an implementation for the tasks pages of Blends which
works for unordered lists as discussed here and I also made sure
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:34:45AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Well, *if* something is *recommended* in the docs filing wishlist bugs
> against packages that ignore the recommendation are fine. Why else
> should we issue recommendations?
For people writing new long descriptions, first off. Tha
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:26:22AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Right. My question is what happens if I do, say:
>
> laptop% smd-push
> laptop% smd-pull # this brings message M as new
> laptop% read mail, including message M
> server% read mail, inclluding message M; flag message M
>
Giacomo Catenazzi wrote:
>Recently it was discovered that a blinking cursor consumes a lot of power
>(blink is normally between 1 and 2 second interval).
>I think it should be the same, in this case.
>Take into account that both uses hardware, thus not allowing some chips
>to rests.
No, they're
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:09:13AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:17:58PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> > AFAIK OfflineIMAP gives you (or will give you soon) something more
> > called always-connected-with-ther-server-to-fetch-mail-ASAP option
>
> Regarding the ITP, I
Steve Langasek wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:13:47PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> > powertop encourages to disable polling, so it is a big point.
>
>> I agree with you in general, but I doubt polling every 2 or 16 seconds will
>> make
>> any significant difference power consumption wise.
>
2009/4/22 Francesco P. Lovergine
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:18:59AM +0200, cassiel wrote:
> > Hi you all,
> >
> > don't know if this could be regarded as off topic, however it involves
> > debian package building system.
> >
> > I am trying to build gdal libraries with ECW support (
> > http://
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:36:31PM +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> > I've the impression that you didn't read my post, I might be wrong
> > though.
> Do you read mine ?
Yes, but not the prev(prev(.)), sorry about that.
> > With that convention, you can use Markdown out of the box (on each
> > pa
Charles Plessy wrote:
> But if there is a problem, I will fall back on the poetic license:
>
>
> Files: debian/*
> Copyright: 2009, Charles Plessy
> License: Poetic
> This work ‘as-is’ we provide.
> No warranty, express or implied.
> We’ve done our best,
> to debug and test.
> Liability for
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 02:17:58PM +0200, Enrico Tassi wrote:
> AFAIK OfflineIMAP gives you (or will give you soon) something more
> called always-connected-with-ther-server-to-fetch-mail-ASAP option
JFTR, that would be support for IMAP "IDLE" command:
http://git.complete.org/offlineimap?a=commit;
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 01:10:26AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Nick Leverton (19/04/2009):
> > This is really an ITA for the existing unicorn and unicorn-source
> > packages which were somewhat precipitately removed from Debian two
> > weeks ago.
>
> Well, I don't call that precipitately:
Hello!, Enrico. (I’m adding -devel back in case there can be people
interested on this.)
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 05:35:20PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> > So does it support (or will it support) using it in the “fetch from
> > server, read/delete some stuff on client, maybe read some stuff on t
63 matches
Mail list logo
