Bug#512360: RFH: openldap -- OpenLDAP server, libraries, and utilities

2009-01-19 Thread Russ Allbery
Package: wnpp Severity: normal The OpenLDAP packaging for Debian could use additional resources. No one on the current OpenLDAP maintenance team has very much time to work on the package, and we're having difficulty keeping up with both the bug queue and with upstream releases and fixes. Given t

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >ll need I suppose cooperation from BTS itself but in a second > time. We need only two user tags by foreign distrib: > bts-link-foreign-xref-$distrib set to the foregin bugzilla entry > bts-link-foreign-status-$distrib magically set by b

Re: Hosting the Debian/kCygwin port?

2009-01-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sjors Gielen, le Tue 20 Jan 2009 00:49:29 +0100, a écrit : > I'm working on a project porting the Debian tools to Cygwin. Ususally ports are hosted by debian-ports.org. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li

Hosting the Debian/kCygwin port?

2009-01-19 Thread Sjors Gielen
Hey lists, I'm working on a project porting the Debian tools to Cygwin. Currently, my plan is to: - Provide some required patches to the Cygwin team, for example to allow a file in use to be removed or modified, since this is required for dpkg - Re-compile all packages and patches currently ava

Bug#512353: ITP: lib-com-stevesoft-regex-java -- regular expression library for Java

2009-01-19 Thread Vincent Fourmond
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Vincent Fourmond * Package name: lib-com-stevesoft-regex-java Version : 1.5.3 Upstream Author : Steven R. Brandt * URL : http://www.javaregex.com/home.html * License : LGPL Programming Lang: Java Description : re

Re: Modifying debian/changelog entries

2009-01-19 Thread Noah Slater
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 09:07:06AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote: > > Sure. Doing so satisfies my OCD need for consistency though. Heh > > heh. > > Surely consistency would argue *against* changing the historical > record? When those releases were made, the email address was as > recorded at the time. Th

Re: Modifying debian/changelog entries

2009-01-19 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:20:17PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > * Is it okay to occasionally modify old changelog entries for clarity and > > style, typos and such like, as long as you don't change the semantics? > > The occassional fix for the previous few changelog entries is probably

Re: Modifying debian/changelog entries

2009-01-19 Thread Ben Finney
Noah Slater writes: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:06:53PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > On Mon, January 19, 2009 13:00, Noah Slater wrote: > > > * If you are the only person mentioned in a changelog and you > > > change your email address, when you do a new upload, is it okay > > > to modify a

Une opportunité à saisir

2009-01-19 Thread arbisfaxi
Bonjour, Sans introduction ni exposé, cliquez sur ce lien , Vous ne le regretterez pas. http://www.1tpe.com/index-pro.php?p=arbisfaxi A votre succès SFAXI ARBI Votre Editeur Internet Si vous ne voulez plus recevoir d’emails de ma part , cliquez sur le lien ci-dessus : arbisfe...@yahoo.fr

Bug#512322: ITP: lua-metalua -- Metaprogramming language designed as a superset of Lua

2009-01-19 Thread John V. Belmonte
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "John V. Belmonte" * Package name: lua-metalua Version : 0.5 Upstream Author : Fabien Feutot * URL : http://metalua.luaforge.net/ * License : MIT Programming Lang: Lua Description : Metaprogramming language desi

Re: Modifying debian/changelog entries

2009-01-19 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > * If you are the only person mentioned in a changelog and you change your >email address, when you do a new upload, is it okay to modify all of the > old >changelog entries to use the new email address? It is better that you leave as

Re: Modifying debian/changelog entries

2009-01-19 Thread Noah Slater
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 01:06:53PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Mon, January 19, 2009 13:00, Noah Slater wrote: > > I have two separate, but related, questions not covered by policy: > > > > * If you are the only person mentioned in a changelog and you change your > > email address, when you

Re: Modifying debian/changelog entries

2009-01-19 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Noah Slater wrote: > * If you are the only person mentioned in a changelog and you change your > email address, when you do a new upload, is it okay to modify all of the > old > changelog entries to use the new email address? I wouldn't. > * Is it okay to occasi

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Olivier Berger wrote: > Le lundi 19 janvier 2009 à 07:12 +0100, Christian Perrier a écrit : >> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): >> > >> > I really useful stuff will be to use user tag in order to crossref >> > another distrib bugzilla. For

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009 à 19:54 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > Hello, >> >> > If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let >> > us[4] know; o

Re: Modifying debian/changelog entries

2009-01-19 Thread Thijs Kinkhorst
On Mon, January 19, 2009 13:00, Noah Slater wrote: > I have two separate, but related, questions not covered by policy: > > * If you are the only person mentioned in a changelog and you change your > email address, when you do a new upload, is it okay to modify all of the > old changelog entries t

Modifying debian/changelog entries

2009-01-19 Thread Noah Slater
Hey, I have two separate, but related, questions not covered by policy: * If you are the only person mentioned in a changelog and you change your email address, when you do a new upload, is it okay to modify all of the old changelog entries to use the new email address? * Is it okay

Come join me on Mocazo Club

2009-01-19 Thread Mocazo
Mocazo Club: Come join me on Mocazo Club! Mocazo Click the link below to Join: http://club.mocazo.com/?xgi=vZHM3i If your email program doesn't recognize the web address above as an active link, please copy and paste it into your web browser Members

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:40:13AM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: > Did you mean "The bts-link is polluted", above ? No, I did mean the PTS. I've no idea whether that is true also for bts-link :) -- Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7 z...@{upsilon.cc,pps.juss

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread James Westby
On Mon, 2009-01-19 at 10:46 +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: > There would be some need for inter-distro work here, maybe... any ideas > on where to discuss that much welcome ;) distributi...@lists.freedesktop.org would be a good place to start. http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/distribut

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Paul Wise
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > BTW, when that is done, please submit a wishlist bugreport on the PTS > requesting integration, *together* with a description of the parsing > rules of the error output of bts-link OR maybe a switch to a format > which can be parsed out

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > Hello, >> >> > If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let >> > us[4] know; of course, patches ar

Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Olivier Berger
Hi. Le dimanche 18 janvier 2009 à 19:54 +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES a écrit : > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > Hello, > > > If you feel something is missing, should be fixed or enhanced, let > > us[4] know; of course, patches are welcome ;) (git repo at [5]). > > I really

Re: Yet another list statistics for debian-devel

2009-01-19 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009, Andreas Tille wrote: > Well, I recieved 3 contra and about 30 pro mails for what I've done. Presumably with my suggestion of mailing -project, and mentionning this in the developers news you might have reached even more people and received more "pro" mails, and you wouldn'

Re: Tracing bugs between distro's bugtrackers - Was: Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Olivier Berger
Le lundi 19 janvier 2009 à 07:12 +0100, Christian Perrier a écrit : > Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com): > > > > I really useful stuff will be to use user tag in order to crossref > > another distrib bugzilla. For instance some bug are fixed on redhat > > like #506180 but not

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Olivier Berger
Le lundi 19 janvier 2009 à 09:46 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > The PTS is being polluted by tons of micro-parsers for the output of > the tools it monitor, a convergence at least on the surface syntaxes > would be nice to ease future maintenance. > Did you mean "The bts-link is polluted"

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:17:06AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Before you decide to push out errors to maintainers via PTS (as I've seen > mentionned), you should really improve the tool so that the only remaining > errors are really user errors. BTW, when that is done, please submit a wishlis

Re: Help bts-link be a more effective tool

2009-01-19 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009, Sandro Tosi wrote: > In recent bts-link runs, we noticed some errors. The log is available > at [2]: please take the time to give it a look, search for your > packages and check the situation. There are errors in that log that > might be ok, but others can refer to broken links