Re: Sections - especially section:kde and section:gnome

> I don't remember using sections in over 4 years of Debian usage, though > I had already used GNU/Linux for a few months before I switched to > Debian. But I doubt even a user new to GNU/Linux would use them much. Everyone that uses a tool like aptitude does use them much. I guess similar is tru

Re: Bits from the Debian CD team

Frans Pop wrote: > The Debian CD team has made practical use of the extra time allowed for > the release of Lenny by implementing some late improvements of the CD and > DVD images available for Lenny [snip] Thanks for massive work! -- Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gm

Re: Re: Sections - especially section:kde and section:gnome

On ven, 2009-01-02 at 16:55 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > I guess we actually need to consider what the sections are good for. > > Asking in a random irc channel at least didn't reveal any real > answers. > > So what about

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

I think we're getting pretty far OT from the original thread here. I'd prefer to discuss this further in a separate thread after the release of Lenny. I also still feel there should be a debian-selinux mailing list, probably targeted at both DDs and users. Would you care to take the lead on tha

Re: starting gnome with xephyr in chroot fails

On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:54:54 +0100 Grammostola Rosea wrote: > I tried to start Xephyr: > > debian-live$ Xephyr :1 -screen 1024x768 -ac > Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic, > removing from list! > Could not init font path > element /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscal

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña writes: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:02:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Oh, sorry, I confused it with a different program. Hm, ethtool I'd put >> into the borderline category -- one argument in its favor is that you >> may need it in order to fix your networking

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 01:02:55PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > > ethtool doesn't seem particularly related to tcpdump? > > Oh, sorry, I confused it with a different program. Hm, ethtool I'd put > into the borderline category -- one argument in its favor is that you may > need it in order to fix

Re: (UPDATED) mass bug filing for undefined sn?printf use

Kees Cook writes: > Aaron M. Ucko >ncbi-tools6 Not any more; I uploaded a fixed version (6.1.20080302-4) more than a week ago, and it's even propagated to lenny because the release team honored my request to unblock it. (Thanks!) I just hadn't previously bothered replying to the thread, e

Re: Bug#510969: ITP: makebootfat -- This utility creates a bootable FAT filesystem and populates it with files and boot tools.

This one time, at band camp, Soeren Sonnenburg said: > * Package name: makebootfat Oh, thanks for looking at this. I had to use it a few weeks ago, and it was a life saver. I was considering packaging it up, but I'm not sure I use it often enough to be able to look after it properly. It wil

starting gnome with xephyr in chroot fails

I tried to start Xephyr: debian-live$ Xephyr :1 -screen 1024x768 -ac Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic, removing from list! Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/:unscaled, removing from list! Could not init font path element /usr/share/fonts

Re: mass bug filing for undefined sn?printf use

> Joost Yervante Damad >timidity Fixed locally, but quite intrusive, will need some more time; also will be combined with other fixes. Joost -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#510981: ITP: epiphany-extensions-more -- Collection of third-party extensions for the Epiphany web browser

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Josselin Mouette * Package name: epiphany-extensions-more Version : 2.24+0 Upstream Author : Various * URL : http://live.gnome.org/Epiphany/ThirdPartyExtensions * License : Mostly GPL Programming Lang: Mostly Python D

Re: Help needed with the GPG Key Signing Coordination page

* Luk Claes (l...@debian.org) wrote: > Hi > > Ralf Treinen and I are looking for help with the GPG Key Signing > Coordination page. > > The GPG key signing coordination page at http://nm.debian.org/gpg.php > is primarily aimed at prospective contributors to find existing Debian > developers who c

Bug#510969: ITP: makebootfat -- This utility creates a bootable FAT filesystem and populates it with files and boot tools.

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Soeren Sonnenburg * Package name: makebootfat Version : 1.4.0 Upstream Author : Andrea Mazzoleni * URL : http://advancemame.sourceforge.net/boot-readme.html * License : GPL version 2 or (at your option) any later version

Bug#510970: ITP: r-cran-randomforest -- GNU R package implementing the random forest classificator

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Steffen Moeller * Package name: r-cran-randomforest Version : 4.5-28 * URL : http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/randomForest/ * License : GPL2+ Programming Lang: C,R Description : GNU R package implementing the

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 09:55:15AM +0100, Gabor Gombas wrote: > On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 02:00:51PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > I think we ought to even consider adding gdb in addition to strace, size > > allowing, since these two tools are rather complementary in their use; but > > certainl

Re: mass bug filing for undefined sn?printf use

[...] > Michael Tautschnig >binutils-h8300-hms > [...] Fixed in unstable. Best, Michael pgpiPwdmopCV1.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 02:00:51PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > I think we ought to even consider adding gdb in addition to strace, size > allowing, since these two tools are rather complementary in their use; but > certainly, I'd prefer having strace over not having either. I disagree. I use s

Re: Override changes standard -> optional

On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 06:05:35PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > It reduces the load on the LDAP server when using LDAP for PAM/NSS, > and has proven to be required to avoid overloading the server and > prompt response on the clients. The new nss-ldapd package help, but > caching LDAP resul