Quoting Christoph Haas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I intend to make the application i18n-savvy. But that's currently not the
> hightest priority on my todo list. As soon as the other issues are sorted
> out I'll happily gettextify the application and send you a file to
> translate. Thanks for the of
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008, Christoph Haas wrote:
How can i contribute a german translation? ;-)
I intend to make the application i18n-savvy. But that's currently not the
hightest priority on my todo list. As soon as the other issues are sorted
out I'll happily gettextify the application and send you
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 21:42:34 +0100, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 18:43 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> > []
> > > I have question which is directly related: shouldn't a package own and
> > > declare all the configuration files that it uses, even
On Tue, Nov 11 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 08:30 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 10 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>
>> > So far as I can see, the only significant difference between #5 and #2
>> > (or #3) is the requirement that upstream distributes "under a lic
2008/11/9 Roland Mas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> tag 504758 + help
> thanks
>
> Raphael Geissert, 2008-11-06 15:42:52 -0600 :
>
>> Package: gforge-plugins-extra
>> Severity: serious
>> Version: 4.7~rc2-5
>> Tags: security
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> By taking a look at the list of files shipped by
>> gforge-plugins
Paul Wise wrote:
[...]
>
> Version info would be useful for providing a list of packages with
> outdated screenshots in any given dist (sid/etch). Also, I think
> multiple screenshots per package are needed so that the
> packages.d.o/sid/foo and packages.d.o/etch/foo pages can point to the
> right
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
[...]
>>
>> s.d.n/needed/sid/a
>> s.d.n/needed/etch/b
>
> That would work for Etch - but not for Sid because it's a moving target. So
> far I would just stick to the version number (not yet implemented).
Maybe one for testi
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 08:30 -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > So far as I can see, the only significant difference between #5 and #2
> > (or #3) is the requirement that upstream distributes "under a license
> > that complies with the DFSG".
>
>
Roland Mas wrote:
> tag 504758 + help
> The way I see it, there are three ways out:
>
> - prepare a new upload that doesn't contain this binary package, and
> leave users with the task of getting the code from the source
> package and installing it by hand;
>
> - ignore this bug for lenny, si
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Haas wrote:
> I intend to make the application i18n-savvy. But that's currently
> not the hightest priority on my todo list. As soon as the other
> issues are sorted out I'll happily gettextify the application and
> send you a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Haas wrote:
> Fellow developers...
>
> it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
>
> http://screenshots.debian.net
>
> after two weeks of programming fun.
How can i contribute a german translation? ;-)
Regards,
Florian
Hi, Florian...
On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Florian Maier wrote:
> Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Fellow developers...
> >
> > it took a little longer than I expected but I finally launched
> >
> > http://screenshots.debian.net
> >
> > after two weeks of programming fun.
>
> How can i contribute a g
2008/11/11 Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> So it can be that your disagreement is not that relevant :)
I won't keep on arguing that, my point was clear enough.
> Not at all, I was assuming that no matter what size the uploaded image is, it
> would be scaled down to fit inside a bounding box
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 09:24:18PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:54:07PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> > >> I think it would be better to try to keep a 4:3 ratio.
> > > I disagree; the aspect ratio of the screenshot would be correct.
> > Conventional screens are 4:3 or
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:54:07PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2008/11/11 Darren Salt
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I disagree; the aspect ratio of the screenshot would be
> > correct.
>
> Sorry? In which way is 110X80 a correct ratio?
>
> Conventional screens are 4:3 or 16:9, and most usual
> resol
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:54:07PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >> I think it would be better to try to keep a 4:3 ratio.
> > I disagree; the aspect ratio of the screenshot would be correct.
> Conventional screens are 4:3 or 16:9, and most usual resolutions keep
> 4:3 ratio (640x480, 800x600, 1024x7
* Package name: banihstypos
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Folkert van Heusden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.vanheusden.com/banihstypos
* License : GPLv2
Programming Lang: C
Description : A simple typing game
banihstypos is a game that helps yo
2008/11/11 Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> Good idea. 110x80 would be a nice size for the thumbnails.
>> I think it would be better to try to keep a 4:3 ratio.
> I disagree; the aspect ratio of the screenshot would be correct.
Sorry? In which way is 110X80 a correct ratio?
Conventional scree
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: youtube-cache
Version : 1.2
Upstream Author : Kulbir Saini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cachevideos.com
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Descri
I demand that Miriam Ruiz may or may not have written...
> 2008/11/11 Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:38:44AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>>> I believe the answer is that in the future there will be more
>>> screenshot, but what about giving the ability of seein
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use sqlite3 with PHP 5 and PDO from lenny, and it works.
OK, I've find it, it's in "php5-sqlite" package. I didn't expect
to find it there because AFAIK that package used to have support
for sqlite version 2... I think
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a canonical list of symbols defined by each of the
> Debian architectures, e.g. do I test for Sparc using
> __sparc or __sparc__ ? How about m68k, hppa, etc?
It's not Debian-specific, but the website at
http://predef.sourceforge.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Lorenzo Granai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: tstools
Version : 1.11
Upstream Author : TStools developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://tstools.berlios.de/
License : MPL 1.1
Programming Lang: C
Description
At 1226411263 time_t, Juan Cespedes wrote:
> Julien, you stated that PHP5 now supports SQLite3 natively
> and with PDO, but it's not true (at least in version 5.2.6-5)
> and, even if it where true, I think we should keep
> backwards-compatibility with all the PHP scripts which are
> using sqlite3_*
Hi,
This email is an excerpt from Sven Luther, sent via
private email. Ths is unedited, but incomplete, I have not included the
final paragraph of that email, since I could not defend posting that,
and this is what I am comfortable sending. The eliding the final
paragraph does not, in
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Krzysztof Burghardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tfdocgen
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : Romain LIEVIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://repo.calcforge.org/debian/source/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
On Sat, 2008-11-08 at 14:11 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> So realistically, let's be honest with ourselves. Not supporting
> devices that require non-free firmwares is not going to help make the
> world a better place. What it will probably do is that users, once
> they find out that that a Debian
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, packages php-sqlite3 and php5-sqlite3
were removed from unstable and testing (see Bug#478479).
However, I don't see exactly why...
Julien, you stated that PHP5 now supports SQLite3 natively
and with PDO, but it's not true (at least in version 5.2.6-5)
and, even if it where tru
On Mon, Nov 10 2008, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> So far as I can see, the only significant difference between #5 and #2
> (or #3) is the requirement that upstream distributes "under a license
> that complies with the DFSG".
Yes. Without that clause, one can say we could ship something
like nv
2008/11/11 Noah Slater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:38:44AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>> I believe the answer is that in the future there will be more
>> screenshot, but what about giving the ability of seeing one (maybe the
>> "most popular") screenshot directly from th
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:38:44AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I believe the answer is that in the future there will be more
> screenshot, but what about giving the ability of seeing one (maybe the
> "most popular") screenshot directly from the result page?
Good idea. 110x80 would be a nice
Eee PC Model 701SD uses the rtl8187se driver which is not in the kernel
upstream. Ultimately, we want to use whatever is supported in the
kernel. While there is some recent work on rtl8187 in
wireless-testing, we don't yet know if this works for the rtl8187se.
We'd be interested in hearing from a
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 01:22 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there a canonical list of symbols defined by each of the
> Debian architectures, e.g. do I test for Sparc using
> __sparc or __sparc__ ? How about m68k, hppa, etc?
>
> My first guess was that would be contained on http://po
On Tue Nov 11, 2008 at 01:02:42 +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > * There are 14 pages and the navigation is truncated to 'Page: 1 2 3 ..
> >14 >'. Could you (optionally) display links to all pages? Or alter
> >the number of results per page (increase, or make user configurable)?
>
> I'll
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 08:31, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Pierre Habouzit ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>> Hi,
>>
>> As some of you may know, I've been the original creator of bts-link[0].
>> Though, I have currently neither the motivation, nor the time to
>> maintain it, or run
Le mardi 11 novembre 2008 à 08:31 +0100, Christian Perrier a écrit :
> As a package maintainer with a few upstreams having their own bugzilla
> (more particularly samba), bts-link has been an incredibly useful tool
> for me.
>
> Everybody know that *I* am personnally completely unable to maintain
On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 01:02:42AM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > * There are 14 pages and the navigation is truncated to 'Page: 1 2
> > > 3 .. 14 >'. Could you (optionally) display links to all pages? Or
> > > alter the number of res
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Have fun and let me know what you think.
Another minor one: when browsing through the result of a package
search, please repeat somewhere the search string, a-la-google "result
for search foo bar baz". It just happened to me that I
On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Raphael Geissert
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * When browsing the packages list it would be great if you could also
> > provide links to browse packages by name (e.g. A, B, C, etc, you get
> > what I mean). *
On Dienstag, 11. November 2008, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Also need lists of packages without screenshots for a given dist:
> >
> > s.d.n/needed/sid/a
> > s.d.n/needed/etch/b
>
> In a similar vein, it might be a good idea to have p
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 01:02:42AM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > * There are 14 pages and the navigation is truncated to 'Page: 1 2 3 ..
> >14 >'. Could you (optionally) display links to all pages? Or alter
> >the number of results per page (increase, or make user configurable)?
>
> I'
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 05:49:40PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > I do think the page lengths, or result count per page, could be increased.
> +1
AOL.
... and on the same subject, is there a restriction of one screenshot
per package (I believe not), because currently the pages of the single
p
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 07:31:00AM +, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I think that the proposal made by Christoph Berg is, as of now, the
> most reasonable. Maybe it could be discussed during the upcoming
> Extremadura session (Nov 26-30) which is meant to be, among other, a
> QA session ?
>
> Actu
Hi,
Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Montag, 10. November 2008, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 03:05:32PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > > Have fun and let me know what you think.
> >
> > Thank you for this; it looks very nice!
+1
> > * what does the search field operate on? A sear
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also need lists of packages without screenshots for a given dist:
>
> s.d.n/needed/sid/a
> s.d.n/needed/etch/b
In a similar vein, it might be a good idea to have per-maintainer
lists of packages with outdated screenshots or
45 matches
Mail list logo
