Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Have I missed some announcement that DFSG violations don't matter for
> the release of ‘lenny’?
No, because they generally matter.
> I ask because a whole lot of bug reports of DFSG violations have been
> tagged ‘lenny-ignore’ without explanation:
[...]
>
Howdy all,
Have I missed some announcement that DFSG violations don't matter for
the release of ‘lenny’?
I ask because a whole lot of bug reports of DFSG violations have been
tagged ‘lenny-ignore’ without explanation:
http://bugs.debian.org/391935>
http://bugs.debian.org/498631>
http
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (20/10/2008):
> Unfortunately, I do not manage to understand why exim4 was not chosen:
#474999.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi all,
on a minimal Lenny system, I wanted to install cowbuilder and ended up
with a very surprising debconf question about citadel-server. "aptitude
why" explains that it was pulled by cron:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ aptitude why citadel-server
i cronRecommends exim4 | postfix | mail-trans
Le October 19, 2008 04:04:58 am Thomas Viehmann, vous avez écrit :
> Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > It is, but the first team that should approve a Linux upgrade in lenny
> > is the kernel team. After that the d-i team would be contacted.
>
> Could you just stop handing out bad advice on the developme
Package: general
Followup-For: Bug #477498
Similar to original report, my system would hang on shutdown / reboot due to
inability to unmount network file systems (network was already taken down).
/etc/init.d/umountnfs.sh is written such that when called with argument
'start' it does nothing. It
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I've brought this up in the past on debian-devel, but didn't follow
> through at the time. We have lots of X-based terminal programs (xterm,
> rxvt, gnome-terminal, konsole, ...) which Provide:
> x-terminal-emulator. That's great and useful, but the comm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Leo "costela" Antunes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-beepy
Version : 0.6.2
Upstream Author : Justin Warren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://beepy.sourceforge.net/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Uwe Hermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: nvramtool
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : David S. Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.coreboot.org/Nvramtool
* License : GPL-2, some files BSD-licensed
Program
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 05:59:55PM +, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Glibc has stubs for many of the pthread functions, that do nothing when
> libpthread isn't loaded. This way, code has not runtime performance for
^
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 03:39:20PM +, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I build the libv4l package [1] the following warning is emitted:
> >dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be avoided
> >if "debian/libv4l-0/usr/lib/libv4l1.so.0
> >debian/libv4l-0/usr/lib/libv4l2.
Hi,
when I build the libv4l package [1] the following warning is emitted:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libpthread.so.0 could be avoided if
"debian/libv4l-0/usr/lib/libv4l1.so.0 debian/libv4l-0/usr/lib/libv4l2.so.0"
were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pierre Chifflier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: setroubleshoot-plugins
Version : 2.0.8
Upstream Author : Red Hat
* URL : https://fedorahosted.org/setroubleshoot
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Hi,
Hilmar Preusse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just noticed that tetex-src is only in sarge and etch, hence we
> can't remove it from unstable. As we (probably) can't fix it in
> stable and it is be fixed in unstable, we have to close the bug,
> right?
I'm not sure, because we have now versio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libwiki-toolkit-plugin-json-perl
Version : 0.01
Upstream Author : Wiki::Toolkit team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.wiki-toolkit.org/download/
* License : Dual
Hello,
I am currently fixing some bugs in a program I want to maintain the package of
in the future. Most of the work is done but there is one bug I'm just not sure
of it's in the program or in d-bus.
The program is a gnome panel applet that calls libnotify_init() on startup. It
works fine w
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> It is, but the first team that should approve a Linux upgrade in lenny
> is the kernel team. After that the d-i team would be contacted.
Could you just stop handing out bad advice on the development list, please?
The answer to the kernel question is "No" and there is no u
17 matches
Mail list logo
