On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> Hopefully Jeremy Fitzhardinge (from Xensource) and others can get the
> important Xen kernel features ported to pv_ops framework and integrated
> into vanilla linus kernels soon..
>
> Status/todo:
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: biojava-live
Version : 1.6.0
* URL : http://www.biojava.org
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description : Java API to develop tools for bioinformatics resea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: mumps
Version: 4.7.3
Author: Patrick Amestoy et al.
License: public domain
URL: http://mumps.enseeiht.fr/
Description: MUltifrontal Massively Parallel sparse direct Solver
MUMPS implements a direct solver for large sparse linear systems, with a
parti
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
> 1. gtk+2.0 fails to cross-build because the patches now try to build the
> udeb which comes up against a bug in dpkg-cross. I've uploaded the
> new version (including a couple of other bug fixes) today. (A late
> problem in apt-cross has delayed things s
[dropping -release from Cc]
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 15:11:44 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > ttf-opensymbol comes out of openoffice.org itself (easily checkable) and
> > is needed for basic operation. You won't get any bullet in OOos lists
> > withou
2008/7/15 Eugene V. Lyubimkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Then I searched the Debian archive (in case of TrueType fonts):
>
> $ grep-aptavail -F Depends "ttf-" -s Package | wc -l
> 93
>
> $ grep-aptavail \( -F Recommends "ttf-" --or -F Suggests "ttf-" \)
> - --and ! -F Depends "ttf-" -s Package | wc -l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Alexander GQ Gerasiov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: qutim
Upstream Author : Rustam Chakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.qutim.org/
* License : GPL v2 or later
Programming Lang: C++
Description : new instant me
Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ttf-opensymbol comes out of openoffice.org itself (easily checkable) and
> is needed for basic operation. You won't get any bullet in OOos lists
> without it.
Even if you're running an X font server on a different host that is
providing that font? Doe
[Eugene V. Lyubimkin]
> Should I mass-file the bugs or this situation can be resolved
> through different approach?
Your message was a bit short on exactly what problem you are trying to
solve. How is the font dependency affecting users of the packages? I
suspect fontconfig-config work on the f
Hi,
Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Some of them: fontconfig-config, blender, openjdk-6-jre,
> openoffice.org-core, vlc. And, as I understand, it leads to 93 bugs of
> "serious" severity and yet another pain for release team.
ttf-opensymbol comes out of openoffice.org itself (easily checkable) and i
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Andres Klode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: mayanna
Version : 0.2.8
Upstream Author : Seif Lotfy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and others
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/mayanna/
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Pyt
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
>> Xen is just one solution to virtualisation. I may agree that a general
>> decision to support virtualisation on Debian could be a policy decision, but
>> whether we'll support one specific technolo
Heya World,
I just did the requested switch, sysklogd/klogd are now priority extra,
rsyslog (not its -mysql -pgsql packages) are now priority important.
If something else, like Tasks or so, needs to be changed too: Whoever
needs to do that please do it. Thanks.
--
bye, Joerg
[ New Maintainer Pr
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:49:07PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:24:08AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> >
> > Xensource has a developer working on getting xen patches ported to Linux
> > pv_ops framework and integrated into upstream (vanilla) k
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
>> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
>> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
>> estimate
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 13:43:05 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Hope nobody will object if the report is sent in the next Misc Developer
> News :).
>
It doesn't need to be on -devel-announce. Just send it here.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
>> Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
>> because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
>> lintian.d.o's results or the archive rebuild's results I can't even
>> es
Thanks to everyone for their comments.
Thinking a little bit more, I believe writing some kind of report might be
of more use. Of course if I find something really relevant I might end up
filing a couple of bugs (I remember seeing something that looked like a
library name being changed in the reb
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:24:08AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> Xensource has a developer working on getting xen patches ported to Linux
> pv_ops framework and integrated into upstream (vanilla) kernel.
That is, to me, only mildly encouraging. 2.6.18 came out on Sept.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:24:08AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > - KVM: is very promising but is it really a valid alternative *now*
> > for current Xen users?
>
> That is an interesting question. We are doing some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi people.
Policy 11.8.5.1 says:
"If one or more of the fonts so packaged are
necessary for proper operation of the package with which they are
associated the font
package may be Recommended; if the fonts merely provide an
enhancement, a Suggests
rel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kov Chai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: sunpinyin-slm
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Lei Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/input-method
* License : LGPL/CDDL Dual license
Prog
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 08:05:21 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:56:47 +0800
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Bug#490857: ITP: watermelons -- watermelon bouncing game
> > CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> >
> >
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:56:47 +0800
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Bug#490857: ITP: watermelons -- watermelon bouncing game
> CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:43 AM, Peter De Wachter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:22:55PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> One big difference between Xen and KVM is the fact that KVM always requires
> hardware virtualization (HVM) support from the CPU.
It uses the the qemu device emulation code, which is security wise one
large catastrophe. Okay, Xen
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lua-base64
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
* URL : http://www.tecgraf.puc-rio.br/~lhf/ftp/lua/#lbase64
* License : Public Domain
Programming L
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:54:09PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > Xen is just one solution to virtualisation. I may agree that a general
> > decision to support virtualisation on Debian could be a policy decision,
> > but
> > whether we'll s
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> - KVM: is very promising but is it really a valid alternative *now*
> for current Xen users?
That is an interesting question. We are doing some research on that
topic right now. I've migrated some VMware and xen stuff
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libpetal-utils-perl
Version : 0.06
Upstream Author : William McKee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Steve Purkis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Peta
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 09:53:25PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> What are the plans for Xen for lenny? Is this situation likely to change
> before the release?
As we have seen, there is no real plan. So lets summarize the
possibilities:
Option 1: Use alternatives
==
Well,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 01:08:23PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/07/08 at 19:39 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:10:28AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > We (Debian) should make a clear statement that users of Debian as dom0
> > > will have at least one supported
On 15/07/08 at 14:01 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> Xen is just one solution to virtualisation. I may agree that a general
> decision to support virtualisation on Debian could be a policy decision, but
> whether we'll support one specific technology, for which there are many
> alternatives, is
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 13:08, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> How/if we will support Xen in lenny is more a policy decision than a
> technical decision, even if it has important technical aspects.
>
> Even if it's not optimal, I agree with do-ocracy for technical
> decisions. However, using it for everyth
On 15/07/08 at 10:33 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:53:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> > > because there are some manpage warnings that
On 12/07/08 at 19:39 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:10:28AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > We (Debian) should make a clear statement that users of Debian as dom0
> > will have at least one supported configuration at any time during the
> > lenny lifetime.
>
> What I do
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 09:53:25PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> What are the plans for Xen for lenny? Is this situation likely to change
>> before the release?
>
> It will ship the hypervisor and a domU kernel. For dom0 it will need
> either the etch
Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Manuel Prinz wrote:
>
>> With these fixes it still did not build on my system. I needed to change
>> the Build-Depends on lib64z1-dev into zlib1g-dev to get it to build in a
>> clean pbuilder chroot.
>
> Well, I guess that lib64z1-de
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 09:53:30PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 12/07/08 at 18:50 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > Because some packages FTBFS, there are some missing build logs[3], and
> > because there are some manpage warnings that are/not found either on
> > lintian.d.o's results or the
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: openturns
Version: 0.12.0
Upstream Author:
- Électricité de France (EDF), the main electricity generation and
distribution company in France;
-
39 matches
Mail list logo
