Re: Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 07:26:05PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote: > From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11: > * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful > for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123. > This means that any package which used xmkmf/imake and h

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 12:41:01AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I find that attitute totally unacceptable. Well it looks that way to me. In fact I would say that is true of ever source package. The goal is to make the maintainers job easy, since they are the ones that deal with the source package.

Mass bug filing: FTBFS because of using imake without Build-Depends on xutils-dev

From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11: * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123. This means that any package which used xmkmf/imake and had xutils, instead of xutils-dev, for the Build-Depends will now FTBFS.

Re: A dream of the Debian-logo

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I do think so that its a really nice picture , but one of my suggestion is > can't you create "e" in Circle/Spiral way. > that is my personal opinion ,your work is extremely good. > > > On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:39

Claim Award!!!!!!!!

__REMOVED__ === Benvenuto in Maxi Mail di Virgilio e Tin.it! [EMAIL PROTECTED] tramite il servizio Maxi Mail ha messo a tua disposizione i seguenti allegati : * loo.txt (0 byte) per prelevarli, fai click sul seguente link ch

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 11:31:14 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote: >On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: >> Shouldn't that be easier to do, and - most of all - documented? > >Playing with source packages isn't normal. >The package is designed to make the life of

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 14:53:03 +0200, Holger Levsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Saturday 07 June 2008 11:51, Marc Haber wrote: >> Shouldn't that be easier to do, > >Send patches?! ;) Since I pay more attention to my personal and mental health, I tend to minimize my contact to the Debian Kernel "Te

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:35:28PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > Taken to another system? I don't remember if I did or not. > The problems I remember: > > 1. the "source" and "build" links pointed to an incorrect place. An > invalid build link is a problem. Where do they point? > 2. If I actua

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 05:23:19PM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:31:47PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > > My problem with make-kpkg has always been that I could never rely on its > > generated -headers packages to actually work. > > Odd, the headers it generated allway

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 08:31:47PM +, Tzafrir Cohen wrote: > My problem with make-kpkg has always been that I could never rely on its > generated -headers packages to actually work. Odd, the headers it generated allways worked for me. > So it was fine to build a kernel. But if I wanted to bui

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And this is where the cmake folks are wrong (I once wrote them a long email about it). >>> >>> link, please ? >> >> To Alex Neundorff and Bill Hoffmann. > > I originally wrote the deb plugin, Alex simply integrated in cmake. If >

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:31:14AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote: > On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > Shouldn't that be easier to do, and - most of all - documented? > > Playing with source packages isn't normal. It used to be much worse > (2.6.8 in sarge involved bu

Bug#485037: ITP: tomcat-native -- Tomcat native library using apache portable runtime

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: tomcat-native Version : 1.1.13 Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation * URL : http://tomcat.apache.org/ * License : Apache License 2.0 Programming Lang: C Descrip

Re: Request for qsynth NMU

OoO En ce début de soirée du samedi 07 juin 2008, vers 21:19, "Sergey Rudchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait: > During the ubuntu package merging I have found that package qsynth is strongly > outdated (0.2.5 from 2006-03-05 against 0.3.2 from 2007-12-1) and formed not > so > well (changes dire

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

"Mathieu Malaterre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> - running ldconfig in postinst > AFAIK that's not always required... Policy 8.1.1. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

"Mathieu Malaterre" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You need to use cmake 2.6.0 (none of the dpkg-* utils are needed in > the process). I believe the current thinking on this is that using the dpkg-* utilities is required for uploads to the Debian repositories. Even if you can duplicate their beha

Request for qsynth NMU

Hello, Debian developers, During the ubuntu package merging I have found that package qsynth is strongly outdated (0.2.5 from 2006-03-05 against 0.3.2 from 2007-12-1) and formed not so well (changes directly to the original source and numerous issues in debian/*). I already have repackaged it from

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do you mean ? Indeed I want the whole process from src to .deb handled by cmake. >>> >>> Then please forget it. That doesn't make proper debs. >> >> b

Re: A dream of the Debian-logo

Hi, I do think so that its a really nice picture , but one of my suggestion is can't you create "e" in Circle/Spiral way. that is my personal opinion ,your work is extremely good. On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's a very nice picture, but I guess may

Re: A dream of the Debian-logo

It's a very nice picture, but I guess maybe it would belong more to somewhere like DebianArt [1] than to this mailing list. Greetings, Miry [1] http://www.debianart.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: A dream of the Debian-logo

On Saturday 07 June 2008 11:44:42 József Makay wrote: > This picture is a dream of the Debian-logo in the future... Very cool looking! -- Wesley J. Landaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OpenPGP FP: 4135 2A3B 4726 ACC5 9094 0097 F0A9 8A4C 4CD6 E3D2 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

#include * Sune Vuorela [Sat, Jun 07 2008, 06:28:03PM]: > > SET(CPACK_DEBIAN_PACKAGE_DEPENDS "libc6, libstdc++6 (>= 4.0.2-4), > > libuuid1, zlib1g (>= 1:1.2.1), libgcc1 (>= 1:4.0.2), libexpat1, swig") > > you do this *manually* ? Relay, he cannot beat http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> What do you mean ? Indeed I want the whole process from src to .deb >>> handled by cmake. >> >> Then please forget it. That doesn't make proper debs. > > because... Because they doesn't use - dpkg-shlibdeps - python-support|python-c

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 8:07 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi there,

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hi there, >>> >>> I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using >>> cmake

A dream of the Debian-logo

This picture is a dream of the Debian-logo in the future... <>

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi there, >> >> I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using >> cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package. >

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On 2008-06-07, Mathieu Malaterre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there, > > I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using > cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package. > I was wondering if anyone had done the work before ? I am currently > struggl

Re: Changes to the ddpo-by-mail service

Raphael Geissert wrote: > Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Raphael Hertzog wrote: >>> And the fact that he sends one mail per e-mail instead of one mail per >>> package makes it even better (far less annoying). >> Agreed, specially for people or teams who maintain lots of packages. >> >> Raphael

Re: Packaging a project using cmake

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 06:04:53PM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using > cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package. Not sure what you mean here, a .deb is a debian package, so what is needed to be cons

Packaging a project using cmake

Hi there, I am working on cleaning up the packaging of my project (GDCM) using cmake so that the .deb produced is consistant with the debian package. I was wondering if anyone had done the work before ? I am currently struggling on how to do it properly when installing python module (what is the

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 11:51:04AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > Shouldn't that be easier to do, and - most of all - documented? Playing with source packages isn't normal. It used to be much worse (2.6.8 in sarge involved building multiple packages, one which depended on the other). The package is

Bug#484982: ITP: libdlna -- A reference DLNA implementation for Linux

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Rob Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: libdlna Version : 0.2.3 Upstream Author : Benjamin Zores <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://libdlna.geexbox.org/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C Description : A

Re: Automatic debiian installation

[sorry for cross-posting, I guess this thread should move away from debian-devel, but I'm not subscribed to any of the others] > Hello, > > I would like to use a system to install automatically all my debian pc. > But > i don't know wich could be the best between FAI and PRESSEED. > > Somebody co

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

Hi Marc, On Saturday 07 June 2008 11:51, Marc Haber wrote: > Shouldn't that be easier to do, Send patches?! ;) > and - most of all - documented? http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage regards, Holger pgprFz3NRVvRf.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: How to build only linux-image-2.6.18-6-686

On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 22:31:09 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lennart Sorensen) wrote: >On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 10:14:09PM +0200, Mauro Ziliani wrote: >> Hi all. >> I need to rebuild only the linux-image-2.6.18-6-686 deb package from >> source code. >> How can I do that without rebuild all packages in lin