On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:43 PM, Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can a process load 1.34 and 1.35 at the same time? Otherwise
> maybe you've got a problem if one lib uses 1.34 and another lib
> uses 1.35 and parts are exposed.
>
> I think you're right that there could b
I have installed the proftpd package on etch.
I need to use mod_ban so got hold of the sources and with some
research managed to patch with the debian patch (at least I think I
did - dpkg-source didn't report any problems and I ended up with a
debian subdirectory).
However, the configure script
"Eugene V. Lyubimkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Hasler wrote:
>> See bug #474294.
>>
>> If you have an x86_64 system you can help by
>>
>> a) installing chrony-1.21 from Stable or Unstable and confirming the bug
>>
>> or
>>
>> b) installing chrony-1.23 from Experimental and determin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Hasler wrote:
> See bug #474294.
>
> If you have an x86_64 system you can help by
>
> a) installing chrony-1.21 from Stable or Unstable and confirming the bug
>
> or
>
> b) installing chrony-1.23 from Experimental and determining if the new
See bug #474294.
If you have an x86_64 system you can help by
a) installing chrony-1.21 from Stable or Unstable and confirming the bug
or
b) installing chrony-1.23 from Experimental and determining if the new
upstream release has fixed it.
You could also look at the bug report and the so
dave j <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I tried Xterm, Xterm w/ unicode support, and GnomeTerminal, all fail,
> lowercase x DOES function within vi within the command terminal and HERE
> (nano?) for example (eg ) and everywhere else outside a command
> terminal that I've checked.
I've had th
On Tuesday 15 April 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Please help test "etch and a half"
> --
> The next point release of etch is targeted to be the "etch and a half"
> release, with the limited intent of increasing the hardware supported by
> the Debian 4.0 release.
Your message dated Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:07:14 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#477338: general: lowercase "X" does not function in
command terminals
has caused the Debian Bug report #477338,
regarding general: lowercase "X" does not function in command terminals
t
Sounds like you've got a bind statement in your ~/.bashrc or
~/.bash_profile.
--
Brett Parker
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.04.18.1741 +0200]:
> for the upcoming Hackontest here in Switzerland, we are still
> looking for more feature requests:
>
> http://www.hackontest.org/index.php?action=Root-projectDetail%2815%29
The list is growing, and yet new ones are still
Package: general
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I tried Xterm, Xterm w/ unicode support, and GnomeTerminal, all fail,
lowercase x DOES function within vi within the command terminal and HERE
(nano?) for example (eg ) and everywhere else outside a command
termi
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:10:05PM +0200, Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Welcome to the first issue of the Debian Project News, the newsletter
> for the Debian community! From now on we'll keep you informed about
> recent events and interesting developments in and around the Debian
> Community on a biw
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian Xfce Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : Alvaro Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://goodies.xfce.org/pro
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jonathan Roudiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ocamlbricks
Version : 0.50.1
Upstream Author : Jean-Vincent Loddo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luca Saiu <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://darcs.marionnet.org/repos/ocamlbricks
* Li
Le lundi 21 avril 2008 à 19:22 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> On Apr 15, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You don???t need automake for this to work, it???s just that automake does
> > things right by default. Fixing the package to get out-of-tree builds to
> > work using VPATH shou
Hi,
I'm using (c)debootstrap in scripts and I found that debootstrap and
cdebootstrap are not options compatible. For instance, --include options are
not the same:
- in cdebootstrap: one --include option by additional package
- in debootstrap: one --include with a list of comma-separated packages
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:53:35PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
If we do decide to have co-installable -dev packages, the next
question is how do we handle the current non-versioned includes and
link libraries? Do we follow what gcc and python
17 matches
Mail list logo
