On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 10:53:35PM +0200, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>> If we do decide to have co-installable -dev packages, the next
>> question is how do we handle the current non-versioned includes and
>> link libraries? Do we follow what gcc and python do, providing a
Hi Paul,
thanks for bringing iotop to my attention!
On Monday 21 April 2008 13:13, Paul Wise wrote:
> Craig, do you think including the iotop python script in procps is a
> good idea or should I create a separate package for it.
moreutils might also be an option, it would also be a new dependen
Respected Sir,
I would like to (just for the sake of reference) highlight myself. I had
applied for GOC2008 earlier last month for an project on File System.
Actually this was the very first time I have been participating into any of
such event. Due to any reasons my application was rejected. I w
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: estron
Version: 0.7.0
Upstream Authors: Neil Williams, Linas Vepstas
URL: http://estron.alioth.debian.org/
License: LGPL
Descript
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 10:36:37PM +1000, Mark Purcell wrote:
> But you are free to assist with the package in what ever
> way you can. All contributions are welcome.
Patrick, as you see you are clearly welcome. So please cool down
and submit patches :)
> Perhaps in the longer term we could con
Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 09:06:15PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
>> Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 05:28:23PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> If you do want to wait for permission/refusal, you might find you
>> never get a reply and end up w
On Apr 15, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don???t need automake for this to work, it???s just that automake does
> things right by default. Fixing the package to get out-of-tree builds to
> work using VPATH should be feasible.
Can you point me to a good example of a package usin
[removing non-related maillists and recipients, this is a purely devel
comment]
Patrick wrote:
> Till did never deal with my correspondence so far, which is why I think
> he should not maintain it - apart from that I am a CDBS fan, and things
> look far cleaner than with his debian/rules.
A bit o
Hi Patrick,
Patrick [2008-04-21 17:55 +0200]:
> You have not _explicitely refused it - but you didnt add me either.
Oh, that might have been the point of confusion. I am an administrator
for the cupsys package alioth project, but you didn't state that you
wanted to work on cupsys itself (and, be
Mark Purcell schrieb:
Patrick Ringl [2008-04-21 3:46 +0200]:
I am concerned about 'cupsddk' which recently passed NEW. On 25th of
march I contacted pkg-cups for joining the team and working on cupsddk
[1] since I am about to repackage 'splix' (a driver for samsung laser
printers).
Martin P
Hello Martin,
Martin Pitt wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Ringl [2008-04-21 3:46 +0200]:
I am concerned about 'cupsddk' which recently passed NEW. On 25th of
march I contacted pkg-cups for joining the team and working on cupsddk
[1] since I am about to repackage 'splix' (a driver for samsung l
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:54:32PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 12:02:20PM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
>
> > How is this different with _any_ dependency on the system? Do you
> > suggest that iceweasel should drop its libgtk dependency, because users
> > might want to use the
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 02:09:40PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> I would say they are making it very inconvenient, but still not
> forcing you. Push comes to shove, you can still build depend on a
> specific version, and use an explicit -L.
That is correct, of course. But if you're u
> Patrick Ringl [2008-04-21 3:46 +0200]:
> > I am concerned about 'cupsddk' which recently passed NEW. On 25th of
> > march I contacted pkg-cups for joining the team and working on cupsddk
> > [1] since I am about to repackage 'splix' (a driver for samsung laser
> > printers).
> > Martin Pitt did
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:58:47PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 22:12 +0200, Jakob Bohm wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 04:12:45PM +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:23:51AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > >
> > > > What about these clauses as a P
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20-Apr-08, 16:33 (CDT), Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > >> I'm not sure if it warrants its own package or if there is another
> > >> package it should be
Hi Patrick,
Patrick Ringl [2008-04-21 3:46 +0200]:
> I am concerned about 'cupsddk' which recently passed NEW. On 25th of
> march I contacted pkg-cups for joining the team and working on cupsddk
> [1] since I am about to repackage 'splix' (a driver for samsung laser
> printers).
> Martin Pitt
Le dimanche 20 avril 2008 à 21:00 +0200, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> Python's distutils honour LDFLAGS, and when building the python
> extension passes -z,defs to the linker, and the build obviously bombs.
>
> I guess the solution is to accept LDFLAGS is to be exported, and to make
> the part that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bugs-everywhere
Version : 0.0.193
Upstream Author : Chris Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bugseverywhere.org/
* License : GPL 2+
Programming Lang: Python
Descripti
19 matches
Mail list logo
