* "Bernhard R. Link"
| I think the main problem is that Debian is by default setting up those
| ipv6 stuff into the interface even when you are in an pure ipv4
| environment. That way exim4 cannot do anything to avoid ipv6 stuff
| and evil things like this can happen.
|
| I don't think that is o
Marc Haber wrote:
In some cases, exim still looks up its IP address when a listening
daemon starts up. This is why the Debian installer configures
127.0.1.1 (not 127.0.0.1) for the local hostname on installation,
yielding /etc/hosts files like
127.0.0.1 localhost
127.0.1.1 myfoo.lo
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
>> Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Package: boost
>> > Severity: wishlist
>>
>> > Boost 1.35 has been released and contains great enhancements. Could you
>> >
"Steve M. Robbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Help would be most welcome!
>
> Packaging is not the issue, however. I think I can do that over the
> weekend. The real issue is whether it can be uploaded this close to a
> freeze; for example, does it break any existing reverse dependencies?
>
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:53:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> >>
> >>> 5. chkconfig works well with the new insserv.
> >> Could you elaborate on that? What's the problem with sysv-rc-conf and
> >> insserv?
> >
> > Really, I do not use neither but when I was updating Debia
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 03:13:15PM -0400, Joshua Judson Rosen wrote:
> Samuel Tardieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Package: boost
> > Severity: wishlist
>
> > Boost 1.35 has been released and contains great enhancements. Could you
> > please update the Debian package?
>
> Seconded--I've bee
(oh, hey, look at that, someone drawing my attention back to this thread
that I meant to follow up to.)
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:43:55AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On lun, 2008-02-25 at 10:23 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> ucf, from its DESCRI
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:50:17PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Host name can be returned by gethostname(2), for example, and you can
> add the result from getdomainname(2) for an FQDN.
Those syscalls has _nothing_ to do with DNS so they can not be used to
form FQDNs. gethostname() is sadly often
Guus Sliepen wrote:
> From the getipnodebyname(3) manpage:
>
> NOTES
>These functions were present in glibc 2.1.91-95, but were removed
>again. Several Unix-like systems support them, but all call them
>deprecated.
>
> The best way is to use getaddrinfo() and getnameinfo(
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 05:48:19PM +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Why is exim using gethost* calls? If you look in the
> exim-4.69/src/host.c file, you'll see implementation details like:
>
> #if HAVE_GETIPNODEBYNAME
> hostdata = getipnodebyname(CS host->name, af, 0, &error_num);
> #
On 2008-04-11, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Bernhard R. Link:
>
>> I think the main problem is that Debian is by default setting up those
>> ipv6 stuff into the interface even when you are in an pure ipv4
>> environment. That way exim4 cannot do anything to avoid ipv6 stuff
>> and
On 2008-04-11, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Exim has the habit of trying to find out about its host names and IP
> addresses when it starts up. This has, in the past, been an issue for
> the Debian packages, since a Debian system might be on a
> dial-on-demand modem line with exp
* Bernhard R. Link:
> I think the main problem is that Debian is by default setting up those
> ipv6 stuff into the interface even when you are in an pure ipv4
> environment. That way exim4 cannot do anything to avoid ipv6 stuff
> and evil things like this can happen.
Yes, I agree this is a proble
* Mike Hommey:
> The main question to be able to answer your question correctly is:
> what does it need these information for ?
It needs to know all of its own host names in order to recognize local
mail. At least I think this is the motivation; obviously, using reverse
lookup to gather this dat
* Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080411 18:16]:
> And the "CONFORMING TO" part getdomainname(2) does not look very
> promissing, too.
actually, the manpage seems to miss the most important part:
getdomainname is supposed to return "(none)", if the system is not
using NIS according to LSB an
* Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080411 16:51]:
> The main question to be able to answer your question correctly is:
> what does it need these information for ?
> The alternate question being: Does it really need this information from
> DNS ?
>
> Host name can be returned by gethostname(2), for e
* Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080411 16:41]:
> To avoid the extra DNS lookups, the Exim packages have a Debconf
> option to configure exim for "minimal DNS usage", which hardcodes the
> hostname into Exim's configuration at package configuration time. This
> was necessary since - without this o
Hi,
I can mention old bug...
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 02:25:14PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 10. April 2008 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> >> What's the advantage over exisiting tools like sysv-rc-conf?
> >
> > 1. chkconfig works solely on the command line.
Osamu Aoki wrote:
>>
>>> 5. chkconfig works well with the new insserv.
>> Could you elaborate on that? What's the problem with sysv-rc-conf and
>> insserv?
>
> Really, I do not use neither but when I was updating Debian Reference
> for newbie, I thought such tool should help. There were more oro
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:41:26PM +0200, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Exim has the habit of trying to find out about its host names and IP
> addresses when it starts up. This has, in the past, been an issue for
> the Debian packages, since a Debian system might be on a
> dial-o
Hi,
Exim has the habit of trying to find out about its host names and IP
addresses when it starts up. This has, in the past, been an issue for
the Debian packages, since a Debian system might be on a
dial-on-demand modem line with expensive costs and thus should not do
unnecessary DNS lookup when
Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> Many packages use GNU autotools (automake and autoconf) to build, to
> the point that "./configure && make" represents one of the most common
> build procedures for Free Software packages. Libraries using
> autotools typically use GNU Libtool, partly because it works on a
Josh Triplett freedesktop.org> writes:
> Thus, I wrote Dolt, a drop-in replacement for libtool's compilation
> mode. Dolt runs any necessary system-specific or
> configuration-specific logic as part of configure, writes out a simple
> shell script "doltcompile"[1], and substitutes it for libtool
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> So hold on or downgrade dpkg-dev to 1.14.16.6 for now.
Anthony Towns has applied a fix to dak and Format: 1.8 is accepted now.
He also resurrected the uploads which have been rejected due to this check
only.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Le best-seller
* Mikhail Gusarov [Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:13:47 +0700]:
> PT> This C library is free and portable. It includes methods to parse
> PT> EPub files and extract their contents.
> Is it a library? Then it should be called libepub or something like
> this. If not, then the description is slightly inaccu
Twas brillig at 11:57:39 11.04.2008 UTC+02 when Pino Toscano did gyre and
gimble:
PT> * Package name: ebook-tools
PT> * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/ebook-tools/
PT> Description : library and tools to work with the EPub file format
What a shame that authors of *
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Owner: Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-webunit
Version : 1.3.8
Upstream Author : Richard Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.mechanicalcat.net/tech/webunit/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Pytho
I have been using Google Talk and thought you might like to try it
out. We can use it to call each other for free over the Internet. Here
is an invitation to download Google Talk. Give it a try!
---
Ankit Saravagi... wants to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pino Toscano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ebook-tools
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Ely Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/ebook-tools/
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: C
Descr
2008/4/8, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think it would. Unless Martin actually wants a parallel installation? Maybe
> dpkg's diversions would help here?
>
> Martin, which files do you need to replace except the binary and pool files?
It now works. :-)
My fault was to use only dpkg -i and
30 matches
Mail list logo