Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: asterisk-espeak
Version : 0.4
Upstream Author : Francois Aucamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : https://sourceforge.net/projects/asterisk-espeak
* License : GPL
Programming
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 14:01:16 +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:05:06AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > As per policy 3.5 I'm bringing this up here. I'd like to add lzma to
> > dpkg's Pre-Depends, so that we can use lzma compressed packages after
> > lenny w/o having to
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> What needs to be done is:
> - run installation/removal/purge tests for all packages
> - run upgrade tests for all packages in etch
> - make changes to piuparts to fix false positives or reduce the number
> of failures by ignoring the less critical ones
> - file all the
I demand that Gabor Gombas may or may not have written...
[snip]
> Also, if it's the -dev package that depends on the tool and the tool
> changes, then the users will get worse error messages.
Unless the -dev package has a wrapper for that tool, e.g. for backward
compatibility reasons. xine-confi
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:49:24PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> In this case, again, if my dev package requires a tool not in
> build depends now, I should declare it, for the same reason -- the next
> upload of the dev package might have different tools, or eliminate
> tools -- and
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 08:47:38AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> It's also a lot of packages - does such a dependency ever become
> inferred by other packages? It probably shouldn't, for your reasons
> above, so this would appear to be a case for a lintian check.
> If ./configure exists and calls
Moin, Raphael...
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 06:12:25PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> This is offtopic to your questions, but I should better say this now than
> forgetting about this idea:
>
> For the new users registration process what about making mentors:
>
> * require the key to be in a key
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:20:10PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11348 March 1977, Christoph Haas wrote:
>
> > The focus of mentors.debian.net is to host source packages that are
> > supposed to be sponsored. So it's not some weird multiverse non-free
> > binary warez repository or something. T
Nikita V. Youshchenko debian.org> writes:
>
> > 2008/4/4, Nikita V. Youshchenko debian.org>:
> > > Martin Schr?der wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to create a package that will when installed
> > > > automatically replace all TeX packages on the system with our
> > > > version of TeX.
> > >
> > >
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080407 20:19]:
> > Here I have to contradict. No -dev package should ever depend on a
> > compiler or linker, even if that tool was not already in
> > build-essentials.
>
> Can you provide some rationale for this assertion? I can see why
> one might
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm currently investigating this perl module; I'll package it or close
or rename to RFP depending on how complex this stuff is.
* Package name: lib
Hi,
On Monday 07 April 2008 19:57, Peter Jordan wrote:
> why are the keyrings of debian-multimedia.org and debian backports not
> in the official repository of debian?
I guess this was answered already in this thread :-)
> At the moment you have to install untrusted keyrings before you can use
>
On Mon, 2008-04-07 at 22:12 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Any package that wants to use .pc files during its build is going to invoke
> pkg-config directly, and changing your -dev package to recommend a different
> means of linking to the library won't cause this reference to disappear.
> That's a
13 matches
Mail list logo
