Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package name: libjss-java
Version: 4.2.6
Upstream Author: The Mozilla Foundation
URL: http://www.mozilla.org/directory/javasdk.html
License: MPL 1.1/GPL 2.0/LGPL 2.1
Description: Java bi
Hi,
> | The foo package's build dependencies are only relevant when building
> | the foo package. For someone who develops software based on libbar,
> | it is not obvious that foo's build dependencies are required.
> Whoever develops software based on libbar will have to have a call to
> pkg-conf
Le Sunday 06 April 2008 00:08:43 Roger Leigh, vous avez écrit :
> > The foo package's build dependencies are only relevant when building the
> > foo package. For someone who develops software based on libbar, it is
> > not obvious that foo's build dependencies are required.
>
> As an upstream, I in
Simon Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Consider there's a package foo which is built against libbar-dev and
>> uses pkg-config to obtain the necessary CFLAGS and LIBS for libbar.
>
>> Now is it the foo package's or the libbar-dev package's duty to provide
>> the dependency on pkg-config?
>
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Krzysztof Krzyzaniak (eloy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: librose-datetime-perl
Version : 0.532
Upstream Author : John C. Siracusa ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Rose-DateTime/
* License :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: praytimes
Version : 1.1.3
Upstream Author : Hamid Zarrabi-Zadeh
* URL : https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4270
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: JavaScrip
Hi,
On Sat, 2008-04-05 at 15:30 +, brian m. carlson wrote:
> I think it is safe to say that Debian supports passing the
> appropriate
> command line arguments without using pkg-config, even if upstream
> does
> not. At least that seems to be my experience.
Yes, but people depending on this
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 03:20:10PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
[...]
> I strongly recommend not to use lzma on embedded architectures.
I suppose that depends on how it's used, but Wikipedia's article on
the algorithm even goes so far as to state:
"Small code size and relatively low memor
* Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080405 16:53]:
> That depends on the library you are linking against. I, as an library
> author is free to say «the only supported way to use my gargleblaster
> library is through the I_CAN_HAS_GARGELBLASTER autoconf macro» (which
> then proceeds to set GARGL
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 04:52:29PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
That depends on the library you are linking against. I, as an library
author is free to say «the only supported way to use my gargleblaster
library is through the I_CAN_HAS_GARGELBLASTER autoconf macro» (which
then proceeds to set
* Hendrik Sattler
| Am Samstag 05 April 2008 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
| > Whoever develops software based on libbar will have to have a call to
| > pkg-config somewhere in their build process so they should depend on
| > pkg-config.
|
| _If_ they do. Please consider the possibility that an appli
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: gregor herrmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libfile-pid-perl
Version : 1.01
Upstream Author : Casey West, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-Pid/
* License : GPL-1+ | Artistic
Programmin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: celt
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Christopher Montgomery, Jean-Marc Valin, Timothy Terriberry,
CSIRO, and other contributors
URL : http://www.celt-codec.org
Lice
Hi,
Does experimental builders infrastructure works ?
I'm waiting to try iceweasel 3.0 on i386.
According to [1], 3.0~b4-2 has been successfully built for
i386 but never reaches the debian pool (see [2] or [3]).
For 3.0~b5-1, we can see the same thing (successfully built
but not uploaded)
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 08:13:59AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:55:40AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
> >
> > Given how much uproar there is about Microsoft's desire to retire
> > Windows XP while many people would rather stick with it that go to
> > Vista, perhaps
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:29:30AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 01:44:56AM +1300, Chris Bannister a écrit :
> >
> > Unfortunately, many people new to Debian/Linux get the impression that
> > testing is perfectly suitable for a desktop system.
>
> Maybe because they have
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 11:31:44PM +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 02 April 2008 schrieb Chris Bannister:
> > On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 03:16:48PM +0200, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 00:38:36 -0300
> > >
> > > Joel Franco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I think that
hi,
On Saturday 05 April 2008 11:26:14 am Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> The problem is that these aspects are not packagable as some kind of
> "fire and forget" installation. I'd prefer the way Roland proposed,
> using some kind of
option 3 could work out of the box, though it just requires more initi
Am Samstag 05 April 2008 schrieb Tollef Fog Heen:
> Whoever develops software based on libbar will have to have a call to
> pkg-config somewhere in their build process so they should depend on
> pkg-config.
_If_ they do. Please consider the possibility that an application developer
links to libba
The problem is that these aspects are not packagable as some kind of
"fire and forget" installation. I'd prefer the way Roland proposed,
using some kind of
# cat /etc/apache2/conf.d/gosa.conf
Alias /gosa /usr/share/gosa/html
include /etc/gosa/gosa.secrets
# cat /etc/gosa/gosa.secre
hi,
a few more ideas for you to think about:
- create a user specific to the package, and
1: use a setuid wrapper binary for doing all ldap communications
or
2: use some kind of user-restricted fastcgi type setup instead of standard
apache mod_php/python/whatever
or
3: run a seperate instan
hi,
On Friday 04 April 2008 01:46:03 pm Alessio Gaeta wrote:
> The package (not the software inside it! :) ) is quite trivial, but I
> think it is very useful (and if you have an ATI with Compiz and fglrx,
> is mandatory, to watch your videos easily...)
what, if anything, makes it better than fu
* Simon Richter
| Hi,
|
| > Consider there's a package foo which is built against libbar-dev
| > and uses pkg-config to obtain the necessary CFLAGS and LIBS for
| > libbar.
|
| > Now is it the foo package's or the libbar-dev package's duty to
| > provide the dependency on pkg-config?
|
| Disag
23 matches
Mail list logo
