On Thu, 2008-01-24 at 07:09 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 22:39 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > Well... as Neil pointed it seems not to be the case -- m68k arch is
> > still -1 but now it is "resolved".
>
> Where are you seeing it as "resolved"? It's still lis
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 22:39 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Well... as Neil pointed it seems not to be the case -- m68k arch is
> still -1 but now it is "resolved".
Where are you seeing it as "resolved"? It's still listed as outstanding
on
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=e
Well... as Neil pointed it seems not to be the case -- m68k arch is
still -1 but now it is "resolved". Also I thought that may be transition
point is migration to testing but not -- it was there on 13th Jan or
so...
Meanwhile for all of you to share the joy ;-) (I wonder why I keep it
open :-))
h
Ben Pfaff wrote:
In bug #262021, Norman Ramsey reported that the "autoreconf"
script provided by the autoconf package runs automake. Since
at the time autoconf merely recommended automaken, instead of
depending on it, this could fail.
To fix the bug, I changed the recommendation to a dependency
If you are having trouble viewing this message, please go to
http://community.icontact.com/p/spencer2/newsletters/spencer2.
Life Success & Life Coach Training... Take our 8-weekend program or 3-day
intensive (both at our corporate office in Rancho Santa Margarita)
OPTION #!
___
Hi Julien,
>>> We currently maintain a little amount of GONME 2.21 modules in
>>> experimental, mostly platform stuff, lacking the manpower to follow
>>> the full set, send bugs upstream etc.
>> Sad :( But why don't you "backport" Ubuntu packages?
>>
> How would that solve the lack of manpower?
>
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> Also, what about checking debconf templates? I think that the
>>> probability of false positives there is quite low as long as you take
>>> care to check "Description" only ("_Description", indeed).
>
>> That check would lead to fa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gpe-tetris
Version : 0.6.4
Upstream Author : David Necas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://gpe.linuxtogo.org/projects/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
Hi,
We (Audacious package maintainers) would like to provide a transitional
package for beep-media-player, since it is now removed in Lenny. We feel
that audacious is a sufficient replacement for BMP, as it's BMP's
logical successor. BMPx is not a good choice for a transitional package,
as it is a
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am torn between the two possibilities. On one hand, Debian policy is
> clear that packages should have full dependencies on all the programs
> that they may invoke. On the other hand, Ralf has a reasonable argument
> that it is the package being autoreco
Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Also, what about checking debconf templates? I think that the
>> probability of false positives there is quite low as long as you take
>> care to check "Description" only ("_Description", indeed).
> That check would lead to false positives where a command
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 18:35:50 +0100, Cyril Jaquier wrote:
> Hi Loïc,
>
> > We currently maintain a little amount of GONME 2.21 modules in
> > experimental, mostly platform stuff, lacking the manpower to follow
> > the full set, send bugs upstream etc.
>
> Sad :( But why don't you "backport" Ubu
Hi Loïc,
> We currently maintain a little amount of GONME 2.21 modules in
> experimental, mostly platform stuff, lacking the manpower to follow
> the full set, send bugs upstream etc.
Sad :( But why don't you "backport" Ubuntu packages?
Please, could you CC me next time? Thanks.
Regards,
Cyri
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 09:08:47 -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I am torn between the two possibilities. On one hand, Debian
> policy is clear that packages should have full dependencies on
> all the programs that they may invoke.
I disagree with that. Quoting policy 7.2:
The `Depends' fiel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ensymble
Version : 0.25
Upstream Author : Jussi Ylänen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.nbl.fi/~nbl928/ensymble.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
In bug #262021, Norman Ramsey reported that the "autoreconf"
script provided by the autoconf package runs automake. Since
at the time autoconf merely recommended automaken, instead of
depending on it, this could fail.
To fix the bug, I changed the recommendation to a dependency.
In response, Ral
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:19:20PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> 0: And actually, it's not clear to me why syslog-ng doens't depend on
> logrotate.
I've ran plenty of machines logging directly to
.../$HOST/$/$MM/$DD/$SERVICE -- no rotation there.
--
:(){ :|:&};:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Exactly. If any of the old, rather inflexible syslog implementations
>> depended on logrotate, I would say that would be perfectly fine. But
>> for applications (even if they write their logs themselves like
>> apache or samba usually do), I w
You are invited to "work and live in canada".
By your host Brenda Grand:
am Brenda from Canada, i am the assistant manager of Canadian Hotels,i wish to
inform you that the hotel need man and woman who can work and live in omni
hotel Canada ,
A Division Of Delta Chelsea Canadian Hotel Can
On 08/01/23 20:59 +1100, Hamish Moffatt said ...
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:07:57PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> > Beginning elinks 0.11.3-2, the elinks and elinks-lite binary packages
> > don't "Provides: links" anymore (See bug #154859 and Debian ELinks GIT
> > commit a885ecead29f80831
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008, Cyril Jaquier wrote:
> A few months ago, I switched from Gentoo to Debian. I used to install/test
> the development version of Gnome when it reached the API/UI freeze. Gentoo
> has the "Gentoo Gnome Overlay" [1] where Gnome packages are tested before
> going into the main P
Hi all,
A few months ago, I switched from Gentoo to Debian. I used to
install/test the development version of Gnome when it reached the API/UI
freeze. Gentoo has the "Gentoo Gnome Overlay" [1] where Gnome packages
are tested before going into the main Portage repository.
Is there something s
> Also, what about checking debconf templates? I think that the
> probability of false positives there is quite low as long as you take
> care to check "Description" only ("_Description", indeed).
That check would lead to false positives where a command is the same as a
project name, because there
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: lua-wsapi
Version: First version still to be officially released
Upstream Author: Copyright © 2004-2007 The Kepler Project.
URL: http://luaf
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
--- Please fill out the fields below. ---
Package name: lua-md5
Version: 1.1.1
Upstream Author: Copyright © 2003-2007 PUC-Rio and Stuart Levy
URL: http://luafroge.net/projects/md5
License:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 02:07:57PM +0530, Y Giridhar Appaji Nag wrote:
> Beginning elinks 0.11.3-2, the elinks and elinks-lite binary packages
> don't "Provides: links" anymore (See bug #154859 and Debian ELinks GIT
> commit a885ecead29f808310e6c2908f59f59a8d69b3ac). The links alternative
> isn't
On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 03:03 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Dear All, may I used your brains a bit
>
> In a fresh package (edac-utils) I have closed a bug in recent upload
> (proper Closes statement and a Closes in .changes). But bug remains Done
> but not closed: #456644.
Looks OK now - mayb
Hi,
Yaroslav Halchenko wrote, Wednesday, January 23, 2008 8:03 AM
In a fresh package (edac-utils) I have closed a bug in recent upload
(proper Closes statement and a Closes in .changes). But bug remains Done
but not closed: #456644.
From edac-utils' bug index:
Debian Bug report logs: Bugs
Dear All, may I used your brains a bit
In a fresh package (edac-utils) I have closed a bug in recent upload
(proper Closes statement and a Closes in .changes). But bug remains Done
but not closed: #456644. I know that it would be that way if I uploaded
via sponsor but I am my own sponsor (although
Hi debian-devel,
Beginning elinks 0.11.3-2, the elinks and elinks-lite binary packages
don't "Provides: links" anymore (See bug #154859 and Debian ELinks GIT
commit a885ecead29f808310e6c2908f59f59a8d69b3ac). The links alternative
isn't installed.
The following binary and source packages declare
30 matches
Mail list logo
