[Anthony Towns]
> Kind of reviving an old thread, but anyway:
> It also includes, but afaics, probably doesn't need to (anymore):
>
> ispell, dictionaries-common, iamerican, ibritish, wamerican
[Agustin Martin]
> #416572: ibritish: Should not have priority standard
We now have aspell, my
[Martin Pitt]
> What do you think about this approach? I'm well aware that this
> alone won't rescue desktop security (getting there is looots of more
> work), but one has to start somewhere.
Would it break fakeroot and other tools using LD_PRELOAD to get the
wanted effect?
Happy hacking,
--
Pe
On Friday December 21 2007 20:50:44 Martin Peylo wrote:
[snip]
>
> The user is able to tweak various options of the Linux network
> stack to gain maximum performance. While this is not needed for
> trivial filetransfer, it is valuable for network protocol
> performance testing.
From reading the we
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
I have already completed packaging of current SVN revision 203. It is
lintian and linda clean and builds under Etch and Sid (through
pbuilder). I will upload it to http://mentors.debian.net as soon as I
get the ITP b
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Kari Pahula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pxsl
Version : 1.0
Upstream Authors: Tom Moertel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Bill Hubauer <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://community.moertel.com/ss/space/PXSL
* License : GPL
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 04:23:52PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:28:28PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
>
> > qmail is meant as a replacement for the entire sendmail-binmail system
> > on typical Internet-connected UNIX hosts. See BLURB, BLURB2, BLURB3, and
> > BLURB4 in /usr/
Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> How widespread is this anyway? I hardly see any new qmail installations
> anymore, and the ones I see are largely because it's a pain to migrate away
> from.
>
> Of course, the plural of “anecdote” is not “data”...
Well, I have too agree with you that almost all my p
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:15:08 -0800 Robin Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
RD> Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
RD> > On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 09:54:46 +0100 Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
RD> >
RD> > RH> Apparently, Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is ready to take care of
RD> > RH> the Debian packag
We recommend you to take two tablets once a day, after a meal.
http://doablilres.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am glad by see that your are thinking or working about the propose.
But i think you are centring the propose in the Gnome Desktop, and i would
like this functionality also in KDE Desktop.
Thanks you very much.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 08:17:08PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> There are certainly many others that don't need patches to fulfill basic
> requirements for an MTA, but whether they are better or not is
> irrelevant for us, given Qmail's level of widespread adoption.
How widespread is this a
John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> There are *way* better MTAs [than qmail] out there that dont need
>> tons of patches applied just to fulfill basic requirements for a MTA.
>
> No, there are not.
There are certainly many others that don't need patches to fulfill basic
requirem
"John H. Robinson, IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> There are *way* better MTAs [than qmail] out there that dont need
>> tons of patches applied just to fulfill basic requirements for a MTA.
> No, there are not.
Is the version that is proposed to be packaged patched to r
Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
> There are *way* better MTAs [than qmail] out there that dont need
> tons of patches applied just to fulfill basic requirements for a MTA.
No, there are not.
--
John H. Robinson, IV [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 16:18:41 +0100, Norbert Preining wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need to check out some build failures on ARM arch in a sid chroot. I
> found a chroot on leisner.debian.org.
>
> But since I have never done this, how can I as normal user there check
> that? Is there something like
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
* Package name: bzr-pqm
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : John Arbash Meinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 11240 March 1977, Guus Sliepen wrote:
>> qmail is meant as a replacement for the entire sendmail-binmail system
>> on typical Internet-connected UNIX hosts. See BLURB, BLURB2, BLURB3, and
>> BLURB4 in /usr/share/doc/qmail/ for more detailed advertisements.
> This is not a proper ITP. You only m
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : simplepie
Version: 1.0.1
Upstream Author: Ryan Parman
Geoffrey Sneddon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL: http://simplepie.org/
* License: BSD License
Description: RSS and Atom feed parsing in PHP
Hey Daniel,
I don't want to distract you from your research too much, but perhaps
there is something you can clarify for the rest of us that are trying
to assess all this too ...
You opened all this by saying:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:08:53AM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> there are more and
On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 05:53:09PM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 07:01:11PM +0100, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> > ...
> > Unpacking replacement bzip2 ...
> > Setting up bzip2 (1.0.3-7) ...
> > install-info(/usr/share/info/bzip2.info): warning, ignoring confusi
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:28:28PM +, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> qmail is meant as a replacement for the entire sendmail-binmail system
> on typical Internet-connected UNIX hosts. See BLURB, BLURB2, BLURB3, and
> BLURB4 in /usr/share/doc/qmail/ for more detailed advertisements.
[...]
This is not a
On Fri, Dec 21, 2007 at 02:33:24PM +, Jean Parpaillon wrote:
> Hi,
> About the question itself, a devel-* list may be good, but about the
> form, this is an English spoken list. Either ask your question in
> English or post to debian-devel-french list.
for these kind of questions debian-user
qmail is meant as a replacement for the entire sendmail-binmail system
on typical Internet-connected UNIX hosts. See BLURB, BLURB2, BLURB3, and
BLURB4 in /usr/share/doc/qmail/ for more detailed advertisements.
See /usr/share/doc/qmail/PIC.* for some ``end-to-end'' pictures of mail
flowing through
Hi,
Sorry for my first mail (I thought I was writing to the devel-french
list) !
So, I have problems with my webcam. When it is unplugged, everything is
ok for Alsa. But, when it is plugged, before the startup, I sometimes
have sound problems...
In order to fix them, I thought that the best solut
Hi,
About the question itself, a devel-* list may be good, but about the
form, this is an English spoken list. Either ask your question in
English or post to debian-devel-french list.
Regards,
Jean
Le 21.12.2007 15:12, David BERCOT a écrit :
> Bonjour,
>
> Je suis hors-sujet sur ma question, m
Bonjour,
Je suis hors-sujet sur ma question, mais, vu les personnes présentes
ici, je pense que quelqu'un va pouvoir m'orienter...
J'ai discuté, sur la ml user-french, de questions autour d'udev. Par
exemple, j'ai rajouté ces règles-ci :
SUBSYSTEM=="sound", ATTRS{device}=="0x266e", ATTRS{vendor}=
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:44:19 -0800
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Consider two libraries, libfoo and libbar. libfoo depends on libbar,
> references functions from it and uses some of libbar's types in its own
> exported API.
>
> We assume the Debian-style libbar-dev, which ensures t
27 matches
Mail list logo
