Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: John Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: trac-mercurial
Version : 0.10.0.2
Upstream Author : Christian Boos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracMercurial
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 10:45 +0100, David Bremner wrote:
> Hi All;
>
> I noticed that wdg-html-validator had been orphaned for more than a
> year, and since I use the offline validator script, I filed an ITA
> (http://bugs.debian.org/390833). Now that I look at the logistics of
> packaging it (down
On la, 2007-12-15 at 00:34 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Thank You for the link, however I consider my proposal actual
> nevertheless. Because using of testing area will provide some guarantees
> for the gcc-snapshot package to be workable.
Having packages in testing that are not meant for th
On 14/12/2007, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> Thank You for the link, however I consider my proposal actual
> nevertheless. Because using of testing area will provide some
> guarantees for the gcc-snapshot package to be workable.
I guess testing users needing gcc-snapshot are likely to have either a
>> I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
>> However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
>> bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
>> version of the gcc-snapshot deb-package has been already deleted from
>> unstab
On Friday 14 December 2007, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
Hi,
> I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
> However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
> bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
> version of the gcc-snap
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 22:38:56 +0300, Dmitry E. Oboukhov wrote:
> I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
> However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
> bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
> version of the g
I needed to test the building of one of my packages with gcc4.3.
However it turns out that gcc-snapshot from unstable contains the critical
bug, which makes impossible using it. At the same time the previous
version of the gcc-snapshot deb-package has been already deleted from
unstable.
As a resul
Hello,
We would like to inform you about a great chance that can help you find more detailed
information about mobile phones, the GSM market and other advantages and gifts that
<> brings to its members.
GSMPress is a comprehensive resource of information fully dedicated to the GSM
market. Its
On a related note:
Why isn't the W3C Log Validator available as a package?
It's the w3c's all-in-one tool with batch validation, link checking,
and it analyzes your server logs to prioritize fixes. Basically, it's
fantastic.
http://www.w3.org/QA/Tools/LogValidator/
Daniel Brumbaugh Keeney
--
To
Moin,
seems like something went wrong during the etch 4.0r1 update on the ftp
mirrors: the old etch kernel packages got removed from the archive, but are
still referenced in the package lists.
therefore from-scratch-generating a local mirror using "debmirror" fails, as
it can not download various k
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, David Bremner wrote:
I noticed that wdg-html-validator had been orphaned for more than a
year, and since I use the offline validator script, I filed an ITA
(http://bugs.debian.org/390833). Now that I look at the logistics of
packaging it (download 5 files from 5 places, make
Hi All;
I noticed that wdg-html-validator had been orphaned for more than a
year, and since I use the offline validator script, I filed an ITA
(http://bugs.debian.org/390833). Now that I look at the logistics of
packaging it (download 5 files from 5 places, make .orig.tar.gz by
hand, no watch fil
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 08:03:59AM +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:41:46AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:48:39 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
>
> > > Under LANG=C ldconfig works fine but under LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8
> > > ldconfig causes segfault.
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 00:03:59 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:41:46AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:48:39 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
>
> > > Under LANG=C ldconfig works fine but under LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8
> > > ldconfig causes segfault.
>
>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:41:46AM +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 08:48:39 +0900 (JST), Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> > Under LANG=C ldconfig works fine but under LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8
> > ldconfig causes segfault.
> correction: not ja_JP.UTF-8 but ja_JP.eucJP
> (I don't check yet if ja_
16 matches
Mail list logo
