On Fri, 07 Dec 2007, Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339581 has been fixed on
> Apr 17, 2007. But it still shows up in http://bugs.debian.org/texmacs . Is
> this a bug in the BTS or am I missing something stupid?
1:1.0.6-11 is still available in unst
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi wrote:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339581 has been fixed on
> Apr 17, 2007. But it still shows up in http://bugs.debian.org/texmacs . Is
> this a bug in the BTS or am I missing something stupid?
Maybe it's because a version with the bug is still availab
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=339581 has been fixed on
Apr 17, 2007. But it still shows up in http://bugs.debian.org/texmacs . Is
this a bug in the BTS or am I missing something stupid?
thanks
raju
--
Kamaraju S Kusumanchi
http://www.people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/
http://mala
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:23:28AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> With constructs like:
>
> PYVERS := $(shell pyversions -vr debian/control 2>/dev/null)
>
> build-%:
> PYTHON=`which python$*` ./configure
I guess this should have been "`which $*` ./configure", right? If so,
re
Xmas is surely here and it's time to get Shopping
We stock huge amount of gifts for Yourself and your Family and Friends
http://geocities.com/EvanKlein09
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Francesco P. Lovergine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'd also tend to think that generic internationalization support
> sentences are quite inappropriate into package long description.
> Support leve is generally subject to frequent changes, so why
> polluting descriptions with those things?
Su
Hi all,
one thing that has bothered me for a long time already is the
complete lack of a security boundary between processes of the same
user. Things like LD_PRELOAD and ptrace() (IOW, gdb) are enabled by
default for all users, and especially for developers this is a good
thing.
However, a lot of
Xmas is surely here and it is time to Shop
We have immense collection of gifts for your self and your Family and Friends
http://geocities.com/DannieMcgee71
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 03:10:35PM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:40:43PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > This one time, at band camp, Leo costela Antunes said:
> > > Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > > I'm thinking of filing bugs, but I'd like to get some feedback here
> >
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 libgtk2.0-0 #MINVER#
> * Devel-Package: libgtk2.0-dev
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2.8.0
> ...
> How does that sound ?
Sounds like a good start! Perhaps the injection should be explicitely
requested with:
* UseBuildDepVersionAsMinVer
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 02:22:49PM +0100, Leo costela Antunes wrote:
> Couldn't debtags support this sort of information in a good enough way
> (not via culture::*, but something like translated-in::*)?
> Or perhaps - if stricter solution is desired - implementing a new
> control field that could
On Friday 07 December 2007, Leo "costela" Antunes wrote:
> Enrico Zini wrote:
> > I'm thinking of filing bugs, but I'd like to get some feedback here
> > first.
>
> While I agree it's an issue (albeit a small one), I think we shouldn't
> file bugs for it while there's no better place to put this in
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 07:28:22PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> both required and base in the same list, so you have to look for the split
> yourselve (zlibg1 and adduser atm), but that's not too hard hopefully.
Yes it is not _hard_, but it is exactly this sort of dependency hunting
that is usele
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:40:43PM +, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Leo costela Antunes said:
> > Enrico Zini wrote:
> > > I'm thinking of filing bugs, but I'd like to get some feedback here
> > > first.
> >
> > While I agree it's an issue (albeit a small one), I think we
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:52:08AM +, Enrico Zini wrote:
> ldap-account-manager is not the only package doing this: a quick search
> gives me [...] gperiodic
I removed that in svn.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
Stephen Gran wrote:
> At the moment, I'm inclined to agree with Enrico. I don't think it's
> all that helpful to have some small subset of all the programs actually
> translated into a given language returned in a search for that language
> string. It's both an incomplete list (since many other p
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007, Loïc Minier wrote:
> I do imagine it wont be mandatory (or useful) for all libs as well and
> I agree it should be added on a per package basis; one idea I
> mentionned to Raphaël is to extend the shlibs / symbols system to allow
> a syntax meaning "Take the build-dep versi
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
> Almost no packages currently do this, hence relying on the package
> description to check wether a package is localized for your language is
> completely unreliable.
Agreed.
> For a list of localised packages check http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po/
> for y
This one time, at band camp, Leo costela Antunes said:
> Enrico Zini wrote:
> > I'm thinking of filing bugs, but I'd like to get some feedback here
> > first.
>
> While I agree it's an issue (albeit a small one), I think we shouldn't
> file bugs for it while there's no better place to put this inf
Enrico Zini wrote:
> I'm thinking of filing bugs, but I'd like to get some feedback here
> first.
While I agree it's an issue (albeit a small one), I think we shouldn't
file bugs for it while there's no better place to put this information.
It may reduce the objectiveness of some searches, but it
Hello,
I'm reviewing tag submissions and I noticed that people added lots of
culture::* tags to a non culture specific package like
ldap-account-manager. The reason was simple: the description mentions:
LAM is translated to Catalan, Chinese (Simplified + Traditional),
Czech, Dutch, English,
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007, Colin Watson wrote:
> I wonder if the objections raised to this suggestion could be addressed
> by making it optional in some way - perhaps either by requiring it to be
> manually enabled for each library by some kind of shlibs/symbols-like
> system, or by providing support fo
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 06:38:20PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2007 at 17:33:41 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Every successful call to pkg-config would fill in a file, let’s say
> > debian/pkgconfig.deps, that would in the end contain:
> >
> > # pkgconfig_file requi
El vie, 07-12-2007 a las 10:57 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz escribió:
> > * License : MIT
>
> hmm, on a fast look trough the tarball all I found was
> - a LICENSE file, with a license from Apple
> - a COPYING file, with a license which seems to be written by squeak
> (starts pretty ugly, didn't re
El jue, 06-12-2007 a las 23:00 +0100, Daniel Baumann escribió:
> squeak is supposed[0] to be unable to package for debian due to legal
> reasons. can you elaborate on the current status?
>
> [0] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/unable-to-package
>
Sure:
Squeak is being relicensed from the old Ap
> * License : MIT
hmm, on a fast look trough the tarball all I found was
- a LICENSE file, with a license from Apple
- a COPYING file, with a license which seems to be written by squeak
(starts pretty ugly, didn't read it, though).
- a COPYRIGHT file which contains the GPL2
and no licens
Hello Thomas,
> On Friday 07 December 2007 01:02:14 Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > He seems to have progressed in creating packages because there is an
> > (unanswered) request to sponsor (upload) them[1].
> >
> > He also posted to debian-kernel in mid-October[2].
yes, thank you - he's back :-)
Hello
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:50:15PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 05:08:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > === Alternate naming of the macros ===
> >
> > Do omit the '''DEB_HOST_''' prefix and all packages should honour the
> > value of CFLAGS etc. in the environment.
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 08:25:05AM +0100, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
> Question: is there somewhere on the net a script (*) such that:
> * it installs required/essential packages (_all_ of them but _only_
> them) of such a release as a chroot in that directory
You could create a variant for debo
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 11:03:08PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Frankly, I suggest we look at the list of Unix commands as
> specified by the SUS -- which can also be seen at:
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Unix_programs
> So -- how many of the standard unix commands
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 04:37:57PM +0900, Michal ??iha?? wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 08:25:05 +0100
> NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * it installs required/essential packages (_all_ of them but _only_
> > them) of such a release as a chroot in that directory
> Isn't minimal fl
Hi
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 08:25:05 +0100
NN_il_Confusionario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Question: is there somewhere on the net a script (*) such that:
>
> * it accepts two parameters: a debian release (etch, sarge, woody, ...)
> and an (empty) directory;
>
> * it installs required/essential pa
32 matches
Mail list logo
