On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 06:05:39PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:33:41PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > If I am a user of one of these packages who may have the skill to adopt
> > it or may know someone who can, I may want to know about its orphaning.
> > At current, this
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 08:46:22AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Saturday 13 October 2007 09:22, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> > Perfect example of a useless buggy package in debian. Anyone needing
>> > dak uses the svn snapshot because the one in the archive
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ebug-http
Version : 0.31
Upstream Author : Leon Brocard, C<< <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-ebug-HTTP/
* License : as Perl itself (GPL or
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:36:04PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>> So, what am I missing? How do I get access to an amd64 system to fix
>> this problem?
>
> try the sid_amd64_pure chroot ;)
Thanks! Okay, now how was I supposed to know about that? :-)
-
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:36:04 -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>
> Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I'm afraid I must be missing
> something. I have an amd64-specific bug in one of my packages, and I
> don't have an amd64 system. According to db.debian.org/machines.cgi,
> pergolesi is sup
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 12:36:04PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> So, what am I missing? How do I get access to an amd64 system to fix
> this problem?
try the sid_amd64_pure chroot ;)
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL P
Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I'm afraid I must be missing
something. I have an amd64-specific bug in one of my packages, and I
don't have an amd64 system. According to db.debian.org/machines.cgi,
pergolesi is supposed to be an amd64 with developer access, but it
looks like it's config
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 08:46:22AM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Saturday 13 October 2007 09:22, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Perfect example of a useless buggy package in debian. Anyone needing
> > dak uses the svn snapshot because the one in the archive is old and
> > deprecated.
>
>
On 12/10/2007 Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Kevin Mark wrote:
>
> > If I am a user of one of these packages who may have the skill to adopt
> > it or may know someone who can, I may want to know about its orphaning.
> > At current, this is going to be noted on -devel.
> >
> > I would like a message o
Hi,
On Saturday 13 October 2007 09:22, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Perfect example of a useless buggy package in debian. Anyone needing
> dak uses the svn snapshot because the one in the archive is old and
> deprecated.
I think you are on a wrong track here. It might be an example of a poorly
mai
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 12:33:41PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> If I am a user of one of these packages who may have the skill to adopt
> it or may know someone who can, I may want to know about its orphaning.
> At current, this is going to be noted on -devel.
>
> I would like a message on the user
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 02:37:50AM +, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Steve Greenland wrote:
>
> > On 12-Oct-07, 02:13 (CDT), Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> Proposed workflow
> >> -
> >> Suspicious packages are found by combining different metrics into a
> >> scor
12 matches
Mail list logo
