Bug#431809: ITP: podofo -- library and tools to work with the PDF file format

Package: wnpp Owner: "Robert S. Edmonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Severity: wishlist * Package name: podofo Version : 0.5.0 Upstream Author : Dominik Seichter * URL : http://podofo.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPLv2 or later, LGPLv2 or later Programming Lang: C++

Bug#431803: ITP: pyctures -- Small and simple web gallery for pictures

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Martín Ferrari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: pyctures Version : 0.20 Upstream Author : Alberto Bertogli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://auriga.wearlab.de/~alb/pyctures/ * License : BOLA (Public Domain) plus some

Re: Bug#417118: ntpdate: Start sequence problem for some network setups

On Jul 05, Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marco> Hope that some day we will switch to upstart. > Ok, so when do we switch to upstart? Probably at the same time when we will switch from exim to postfix. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#417118: ntpdate: Start sequence problem for some network setups

> "Marco" == Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Marco> Hope that some day we will switch to upstart. Ok, so when do we switch to upstart? -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTE

Bug#431787: ITP: libcompizconfig -- Settings library for plugins - OpenCompositing Project

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: libcompizconfig Version : 0.0+git20070626 Upstream Author : Danny Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dennis Kasprzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nicolas Devill

Re: ftp.debian.org lacking behind and p.d.o too

On Wednesday 4 July 2007 21:30, Daniel Leidert wrote: > I cannot see it. I would have to sign in, but there doesn't seem to be > any possibility to create an account. However, I never heard of > rt.debian.org. I checked http://bugs.debian.org/ftp.debian.org but > didn't find any report. So I asked

Re: ftp.debian.org lacking behind and p.d.o too

Am Mittwoch, den 04.07.2007, 08:38 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > On Tue, 03 Jul 2007, Daniel Leidert wrote: [partial ftp.debian.org outage] > > Thanks for fixing this (saw the results already yesterday :)). > > FWIW, debian-devel was not really the proper place to report this problem > (no bla

Bug#431763: ITP: librunapp-perl -- A generic module to configure and run web-applications

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: David Bremner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: librunapp-perl Version : 0.13 Upstream Author : Chia-liang Kao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://search.cpan.org/~clkao/RunApp-0.13 * License : Perl (GPL/Artistic) Prog

Bug#431755: ITP: compiz-fusion-plugins-main -- Collection of plugins from OpenCompositing for Compiz

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: compiz-fusion-plugins-main Version : 0.0.0+git20070703 Upstream Author : "Various Artists" (Contributed Plugins) * URL : http://www.ope

Bug#431756: ITP: compiz-bcop -- Compiz option code generator

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: compiz-bcop Version : 0.0.0+git20070703 Upstream Author : Dennis Kasprzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.opencompositing.org *

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Maybe it's not complete or up to date - please help keeping it up to > date :) There is a more up2date list in the svn; I'll eventually sync the wiki with svn then. -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inte

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 19:53 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi debian-kernel ;) > > for those of you who dont read debian-devel... :-) > > On Wednesday 04 July 2007 18:14, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. > > Thomas, if you think that

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

Hi debian-kernel ;) for those of you who dont read debian-devel... :-) On Wednesday 04 July 2007 18:14, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. Thomas, if you think that a bug has fallen under the radar of a maintainers team, why do you send

Re: Considerations for 'xmms' removal from Debian

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 01:40:05AM -0400, Jordi Gutierrez Hermoso wrote: > On 03/07/07, Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I heard this crap only when using alsa. > > which is a problem, since OSS is deprecated in favour of ALSA. It's only OSS-the-kernel-drivers that are deprecated. OSS-t

Bug#431750: ITP: compizconfig-settings-manager -- Compiz configuration settings manager

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: compizconfig-settings-manager Version : 0.0+git20070703 Upstream Author : Quinn Storm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.opencompos

Bug#431749: ITP: compiz-fusion-plugins-extra -- Collection of extra plugins from OpenCompositing for Compiz

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: compiz-fusion-plugins-extra Version : 0.0.0+git20070703 Upstream Author : "Various Artists" (Contributed Plugins) * URL : http://openco

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

Thomas Bushnell BSG dijo [Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 08:58:03AM -0700]: > Who are the actual kernel maintainers? debian-kernel is listed, but > that's surely not right, since anyone can join that list. I assume that > not just anyone who joins debian-kernel is therefore a maintainer of > Debian kernel

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On 7/4/07, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2007 at 09:14:24 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. It's a > > critical bug, which should norma

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:18 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Jul 4, 2007 at 09:14:24 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. It's a > > critical bug, which should normally get some attention, and mail to > > debian-kernel on th

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wednesday 04 July 2007 18:38, you wrote: > At that point, I had to walk across campus where I could plug in to a > wired ethernet, identify the problem, rebuild the module, forcibly > install the new package, and now place the package on hold until a fix > arrives. So, you're running unstable,

Re: Bug#417118: ntpdate: Start sequence problem for some network setups

On Jul 04, Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my case the network connection doesn't come up until after I've > logged in and given the pasword for the wireless network. I don't > think upstart is going to fix that. It is. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: Digital s

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wed, Jul 4, 2007 at 09:38:24 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I installed the package, which was automatically upgraded since I have > the previous version of the module which you had to build yourself. My > network immediately failed. > > At that point, I had to walk across campus where

Re: Bug#417118: ntpdate: Start sequence problem for some network setups

On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 17:11:24 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On 7/4/07, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Jul 04, Touko Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Is there any ideas to fix this? I'm having same problem with ntp+dnsmasq >> Hope that some day we will switch to

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:35 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 04 July 2007 18:30, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > I doubt that that BR deserves an RC severity to be honest. > > > > Really? The package *has no module*. It is a package which exists > > *only to provide a module*. > > Let me

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wednesday 04 July 2007 18:30, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > I doubt that that BR deserves an RC severity to be honest. > > Really? The package *has no module*. It is a package which exists > *only to provide a module*. Let me phrase it differently then: not all RC bugs are equally urgent.

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:26 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 04 July 2007 18:14, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. It's a > > critical bug, which should normally get some attention, and mail to > > debian-kernel on the question, by

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wednesday 04 July 2007 18:14, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. It's a > critical bug, which should normally get some attention, and mail to > debian-kernel on the question, by at least a half-dozen people, has > gotten no response that

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wed, Jul 4, 2007 at 09:14:24 -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > I'm trying to find out who has responsibility for Bug #430646. It's a > critical bug, which should normally get some attention, and mail to > debian-kernel on the question, by at least a half-dozen people, has > gotten no respon

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 18:05 +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 04 July 2007 17:58, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Who are the actual kernel maintainers? debian-kernel is listed, but > > that's surely not right, since anyone can join that list. I assume > > that not just anyone who joins debia

Re: who are the kernel maintainers?

On Wednesday 04 July 2007 17:58, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Who are the actual kernel maintainers? debian-kernel is listed, but > that's surely not right, since anyone can join that list. I assume > that not just anyone who joins debian-kernel is therefore a maintainer > of Debian kernel packag

who are the kernel maintainers?

Who are the actual kernel maintainers? debian-kernel is listed, but that's surely not right, since anyone can join that list. I assume that not just anyone who joins debian-kernel is therefore a maintainer of Debian kernel packages. Thomas signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Bug#431734: ITP: sepia -- Simple Emacs-Perl Interaction

Package: wnpp Owner: Hilko Bengen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Severity: wishlist * Package name: sepia Version : 0.92-1 Upstream Author : Sean O'Rourke * URL or Web page : http://search.cpan.org/~seano/Sepia/ * License : Perl Description : Simple Emacs-Perl Interaction Sep

Re: Bug#417118: ntpdate: Start sequence problem for some network setups

On 7/4/07, Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 04, Touko Korpela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there any ideas to fix this? I'm having same problem with ntp+dnsmasq Hope that some day we will switch to upstart. In my case the network connection doesn't come up until after I've log

Re: Bug#229357: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?

On 02/07/07 at 21:26 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Lucas has agreed to doing a full archive rebuild with a modified dpkg-dev, > for comparison with the previous test. A dpkg-dev binary including this > change can be found at > . Hi,

Re: Bug#229357: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?

Hi, Ian Jackson wrote: We want the package to _declare_ whether it supports this new target. Ideally, we'd want all packages to support the new target, and then turn that into policy, otherwise we'll end up supporting both for a very long time. The proposed -Options field will actually b

Re: Bug#229357: Can we require build-arch/indep targets for lenny?

Hi, Wouter Verhelst wrote: $(shell ls temp-target-* && rm temp-target-*): Yes, that's broken, but there are your side effects, and you'll have to run this code if you want to make your --has-target work. Yes, that is exactly what I'm proposing. The same thing happens for -q mode now.