On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 04:48:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Daniel Burrows wrote:
>
> > * aptitude forgetting the automatic status of packages that were
> > installed with old versions of aptitude.
> >
> > * aptitude not saving automatic states so tha
Daniel Burrows wrote:
> * aptitude forgetting the automatic status of packages that were
> installed with old versions of aptitude.
>
> * aptitude not saving automatic states so that apt-get can see them.
Any way of checking this easily? I imagine a diff of the old and
new /var/lib/aptit
* Filipus Klutiero ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070616 20:46]:
> Le vendredi 15 juin 2007 19:19, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> > Release team structure
> > ~~
> > Steve Langasek, who served as Release Manager for the past two cycles,
> > doesn't want to be on the hot seat anymore. As he is
Phillip Susi wrote:
> Christof Krüger wrote:
>> Unfortunately, computer designers, technicians etc. are not living in an
>> isolated world (well.. maybe some of them).
>> No one wants to forbid the computer people to use base 2 numbers. They
>> are just asked to write KiB instead of KB if they mean
Le vendredi 15 juin 2007 19:19, Andreas Barth a écrit :
> Release team structure
> ~~
> Steve Langasek, who served as Release Manager for the past two cycles,
> doesn't want to be on the hot seat anymore. As he is still an active member
> of the release team, we decided to have
>It would be interesting to change name Debian Multimedia to prevent
> confusion with Debian-Multimedia site[1]?
Piping in as a user, I can say this has caused me a bit of confusion on more
than one occasion. Given that there are versions of the same packages which
are alternately hosted by
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gustavo R. Montesino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-bzutils
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Gustavo R. Montesino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://bug-triage.alioth.debian.org/
* License : GPL
Programming
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 10:23:27AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The ported aptitude should merge its database of automatically
> installed packages into the apt database -- any packages listed as
> automatic in either database will become automatic.
>
Dude - YOU ROCK :) This is
Hi all,
As you probably noticed, Michael Vogt uploaded apt 0.7.2 to unstable
with support for detecting automatically installed packages. I've
ported aptitude to use the new apt interfaces instead of its internal
implementation, and uploaded the result to experimental.
The ported aptitude
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Gonéri Le Bouder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libkhepctrl
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Guillaume Libersat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://vcs.patapouf.org/svn/libkhepctrl/
* License : GPL
Programming La
Hi,
Just received following:
[...]
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mail.gmx.net.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
70.103.162.29_does_not_like_recipient./Remot
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Tassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: lua-zip
Version : 1.2.2
Upstream Author : Copyright © 2003-2006 The Kepler Project.
* URL : http://www.keplerproject.org/luazip/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
D
On Saturday 16 June 2007 04:43:53 Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 15 juin 2007 à 17:36 -0400, Ivan Jager a écrit :
> > Yes. Any time the unit is bytes. There is even a standard for it.
>
> I must have missed that one. Could you point us to this standard?
I too would love to see that standard
* Bill Allombert ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070616 15:43]:
> I understand the wish of a short freeze, but QA need to happen on the
> packages we ship, not with the package that happened to be in the
> archive at the time QA occured. That is why we are Debian after all.
Nobody wants to promote to not doi
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 01:19:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Quality Assurance (QA) checks on the archive were started very late in
>the cycle. They were very useful, but the timing was very unfortunate.
>We want to encourage all interested parties to start their QA checks as
>ea
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Jared Dominguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: xmonad
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Spencer Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.xmonad.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Haskell
Descriptio
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daniel Jared Dominguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dzen
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Robert Manea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: C
Description
Hi Bill,
* Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-16 12:44]:
> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 01:19:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > after the release is prior to the release. As we all know that, the
> > Release Team members (except Steve) have met in Juelich recently to
> > discuss our impressi
Le vendredi 15 juin 2007 à 17:36 -0400, Ivan Jager a écrit :
> Yes. Any time the unit is bytes. There is even a standard for it.
I must have missed that one. Could you point us to this standard?
> How about when you buy 80 GB of RAM, and your software says you have
> 88 GB?
How about buying 80 G
Le vendredi 15 juin 2007 à 13:46 -0400, Phillip Susi a écrit :
> Different disciplines often ascribe different meanings to the same
> words, so there is no reason why the prefix "Kilo" can not mean 1024 in
> the context of computer science, so please stop complaining about that.
You cannot alwa
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 01:19:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after the release is prior to the release. As we all know that, the
> Release Team members (except Steve) have met in Juelich recently to
> discuss our impressions of the Etch release cycle and kick-off the Lenny
> cycle.
ex
Phillip Susi a écrit :
> Christof Krüger wrote:
>> Unfortunately, computer designers, technicians etc. are not living in an
>> isolated world (well.. maybe some of them).
>> No one wants to forbid the computer people to use base 2 numbers. They
>> are just asked to write KiB instead of KB if they m
22 matches
Mail list logo
