Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Jan Michael Alonzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-pycallgraph
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Gerald Kaszuba
* URL : http://pycallgraph.slowchop.com/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:36:55PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> php4-dev
This package is EOL and will not be fixed for this transition (assuming it
applies).
> php5-dev
This is a false positive, the only use of 'long double' in the php5 header
files is in a macro definition.
Please exclude th
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>
> > So consider this a +1 for me to get write access to all DD by default in
> > our website.
>
> for the content I'm pretty sure that's a good idea. Giving all DDs
> access to the css could result in a new design every week. Although that
> sounds like
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 397 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 82 (new: 2)
Total number of packages requeste
[Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña]
> Actually, the website has errata pages for each release work at the
> wiki could be a basis for an updated page at the website.
Yes. I suggest using http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEtch> for this
purpose.
Happy hacking,
--
Petter Reinholdtsen
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 11:36:55PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> With glibc-2.5 and gcc-4.1.2 (and gcc-4.2), the `long double' data
> type did change from a 64bit representation to a 128bit representation
> on alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390. To allow partial upgrades of packages,
> we will need to re
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ryan Kavanagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: aoeui -- Lightweight, unobtrusive, Dvorak-optimized text editor
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-M
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: rnahybrid
Version : 2.1
Upstream Author : Marc Rehmsmeier, Peter Steffen, Matthias Hoechsmann
URL : http://bibiserv.techfak.uni-bielefeld.de/rnahybrid/
License : GPL
Gabor Gombas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:46:30PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
>> However, there doesn't seem to be any single, consistent,
>> doesn't-change-for-the-life-of-the-release, programmatically possible
>> (never mind *easy* just yet...) method to find out if I'm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Rene Mayorga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: rsstail
* Version : 1.1
* Upstream Author : Folkert van Heusden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.vanheusden.com/rsstail/
* License : GPLv2
* Description : (see below)
> So consider this a +1 for me to get write access to all DD by default in
> our website.
for the content I'm pretty sure that's a good idea. Giving all DDs
access to the css could result in a new design every week. Although that
sounds like an interesting thing to watch ;)
--
Bernd Zeimetz
<[E
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> Santiago, would you be willing to introduce this new file (distinct from
> /etc/debian_version) into base-files, and maintain two separate branches
> of the package as explained by Javier?
That would be an ugly hack. base-files is a package which is uplo
I have moved to UC Berkeley, CA.
My new contact e-mail is: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you wish to reach me, please resend this e-mail directly to my new e-mail
because I will not read e-mail to my UPENN address anymore.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
* Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña [Thu, 31 May 2007 12:33:07 +0200]:
Hello.
> I actually think we should ship a *distinct* /etc/debian_version
> in testing and not make it follow the "sid->testing->stable" dance. Otherwise
> there is a timeframe in which sid's or testing's base-files say's it is
>
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Attached you can find a list of packages with header files in
> /usr/include matching 'long *double'.
> [...]
> gettext
I don't understand this, as
grep double `dpkg -L gettext | grep include/`
outputs nothing.
Is this a false positive?
[ Please ke
With glibc-2.5 and gcc-4.1.2 (and gcc-4.2), the `long double' data
type did change from a 64bit representation to a 128bit representation
on alpha, powerpc, sparc, s390. To allow partial upgrades of packages,
we will need to rename all packages holding libraries with the long
double data type in th
On Thu, 31 May 2007 18:47:37 +0200 Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I plan to file an ITP and package a cute small game
[...]
> All the game code is licensed under the GPL 2.0.
Good.
> All the game content,
> sounds and graphics are licensed under Creative Commons 3.0
> Attribution license ( http:/
Hi,
I'm thinking of converting a subversion repository I use for one of my
debian packages to git (preferably with all history intact). The
repository was created by svn-buildpackage, so it has a structure like
this:
trunk/
tags/
tags/1.0-1/
branches/
branches/mybranch/
branches/upstream/
* From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:37:54 +0200
* Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
> also sprach Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.31.1013 +0200]:
>> Then call me !
>
> Do you have a POSIX-compatible solution to the problem of setting
> variables inside whi
On Thursday 31 May 2007 19:03:41 Ian Jackson wrote:
> (Note that I'm adamantly opposed to the IMO crazy plans to replace the
> on-disk status database format. IMO the parsing needs to be sped up
> and the Descriptions moved into a separate file. But this is a
> discussion for a different list.)
On May 31, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, I prefer to ask about it first: Does anyone know if CC-by 3.0 is
> DFSG-free or not for sure, shall I go ahead and put it in the repositories?
The ftpmasters do.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I plan to file an ITP and package a cute small game called "Which Way Is
Up?" ( http://hectigo.net/puskutraktori/whichwayisup/ ) and maintain it.
All the game code is licensed under the GPL 2.0. All the game content,
sounds and graphics are licensed under Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution
lic
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:50:50PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> That sounds a bit strange as the version of glibc in testing is the same
> as the one in stable. Or do you mean "sid" instead of "lenny"?
Oops, you're right. It's etch+sid.
Gabor
--
-
Guillem Jover writes ("Parsing of dpkg status file considered harmful"):
> Please stop parsing dpkg status file from maintainer scripts. No
> package should assume its location or format (except for now for
> package managment frontends and the like, until there's a proper
> library they can use).
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:04:08PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Situation: Two source packages collide in the namespace. The
> second one gets rather awkward name. Later, the first package dies
> and is removed from unstable, testing, and (after release) stable,
> but still remains in oldstable.
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:46:32PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> In order to find the Debian maintainer, we'd have to have an additional
> pass to extract that information -- which would actually be quite
> expensive (unpacking 16,000 source packages every hour!)"
That's bogus, the maintainer fie
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: homebank
Version : 3.2
Upstream Author : Maxime Doyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://homebank.free.fr/
License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : Man
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 05:34:10PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> But I am asking you still: can you think of anything to say against
> such an approach? Please don't flame languages or anything of that
> sort. The question is just: is it viable for a C++ coder with
> a Python proficiency to mocku
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 15:22:59 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 07:53 +0300 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> > I've been meaning to send this for some time, but latest docbook-xml
> > upload finally triggered it.
>
> Well, why didn't you send me a CC of this mail? I just stumble
On Thu, 2007-05-31 at 14:51:00 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 à 07:53 +0300, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> > If you need to retrieve the conffile info, which is why most of those
> > packages are poking at the status file, please use something like:
> >
> > $ dpkg-query -W
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Daigo Moriwaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libhmac-ruby1.8
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Daiki Ueno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : Ruby's license
Programming Lang: Ruby
Descr
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:06:28PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> That would "bless" the abuse of /etc/debian_version. IMHO, it would be
> good for Debian if we continue to discourage its use.
LSB compliance (which is a release goal) obliges us to provide proper
versioning information for releases.
On Thursday 31 May 2007 14:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote, Thursday, May 31, 2007 1:04 PM
>
> > Situation: Two source packages collide in the namespace. The second
> > one gets rather awkward name. Later, the first package dies and is
> > removed from unstable, testing, and (aft
Hi,
Anyone knows why the popcon graphs on:
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package= are
missing?
I mailed igloo 5 days ago without any reply yet.
Anyone knows more?
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF
For security reasons, all text in this ma
The Fungi wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:46:30PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> [...]
>> On RHEL and derived distros, there's usually a file /etc/redhat-release
>> (sometimes renamed, but usually trivially enough that it can be found
>> with little trouble) containing both the distro code name an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Dominic Hargreaves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libdata-ical-perl
Version : 0.13
Upstream Author : Jesse Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-ICal/
* License : Perl
Programming Lang
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 07:53 +0300 schrieb Guillem Jover:
> I've been meaning to send this for some time, but latest docbook-xml
> upload finally triggered it.
Well, why didn't you send me a CC of this mail? I just stumbled over
this by fluke.
> Please stop parsing dpkg status file from ma
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:06:28PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > That would "bless" the abuse of /etc/debian_version. IMHO, it would be
> > good for Debian if we continue to discourage its use.
>
> LSB compliance (which is a release g
On Thursday 31 May 2007 14:46, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> "Unfortunately as you're probably aware, Debian insists that we don't
> attribute Ubuntu packages to the Debian maintainer anywhere. Under this
> agreement, we have to change the Maintainer field in our packages.
As far as I know no-one ever
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> I asked him in February excately this. I don't think he mind that I
> paste it here:
>
> "Unfortunately as you're probably aware, Debian insists that we don't
> attribute Ubuntu packages to the Debian maintainer anywhere. Under this
> agreement, we hav
Le mercredi 30 mai 2007 à 07:53 +0300, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> I've been meaning to send this for some time, but latest docbook-xml
> upload finally triggered it.
>
> Please stop parsing dpkg status file from maintainer scripts. No
> package should assume its location or format (except for now f
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:46:32PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> > This might be too obvious, but: did you check whether Ubuntu/Scott would be
> > willing to provide a per-maintainer indexed version on their
> > patches.ubuntu.com?
>
> I asked him in February excately t
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:46:32PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> "Unfortunately as you're probably aware, Debian insists that we don't
> attribute Ubuntu packages to the Debian maintainer anywhere. Under this
> agreement, we have to change the Maintainer field in our packages.
Don't they still k
Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> This might be too obvious, but: did you check whether Ubuntu/Scott would be
> willing to provide a per-maintainer indexed version on their
> patches.ubuntu.com?
I asked him in February excately this. I don't think he mind that I
paste it here:
"Unfortunately as you're p
Magnus Holmgren wrote, Thursday, May 31, 2007 1:04 PM
Situation: Two source packages collide in the namespace. The second
one gets rather awkward name. Later, the first package dies and is
removed from unstable, testing, and (after release) stable, but still
remains
in oldstable.
Question: Ca
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: pkg
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : hg clone http://hg.debian.org/hg/private/enrico/libpkg
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
On Thu, 31 May 2007, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:35:06AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I believe there is something fundamentally wrong if you *have* to rely
> > on /etc/debian_version for anything. The number of Debian packages
> > actually us
I didn't get any response on debian-mentors, so I repost this question here:
Situation: Two source packages collide in the namespace. The second one gets
rather awkward name. Later, the first package dies and is removed from
unstable, testing, and (after release) stable, but still remains in
ol
On Thursday 31 May 2007 12:11, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> Forget it. I already have a machine in production which is mostly etch
> but glibc and a handful of other packages are from lenny.
That sounds a bit strange as the version of glibc in testing is the same
as the one in stable. Or do you mean "si
On Thursday 31 May 2007 00:01, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> I am wondering if anyone still uses the re-ordered ubuntu patches
> provided by the Utnubu team at
This might be too obvious, but: did you check whether Ubuntu/Scott would be
willing to provide a per-maintainer indexed version on their
pat
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 12:35:06AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I believe there is something fundamentally wrong if you *have* to rely
> on /etc/debian_version for anything. The number of Debian packages
> actually using such file is probably zero (but I could be wrong).
Bastille uses it
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 04:46:30PM -0400, Kris Deugau wrote:
> However, there doesn't seem to be any single, consistent,
> doesn't-change-for-the-life-of-the-release, programmatically possible
> (never mind *easy* just yet...) method to find out if I'm on Debian
> sarge, etch, lenny, or some third
On 5/31/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
In the Moment i'm packaging some software and wonder if there is a
possibility to handle files such as crontab or configuration files of other
programs to add a directive with postinst but also to remove that directive
with prerm.
Hello,
In the Moment i'm packaging some software and wonder if there is a
possibility to handle files such as crontab or configuration files of
other programs to add a directive with postinst but also to remove that
directive with prerm. Is there a predefined possibility for that or do I
have
also sprach Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.05.31.1013 +0200]:
> Then call me !
Do you have a POSIX-compatible solution to the problem of setting
variables inside while loops?
See http://blog.madduck.net/geek/2006.05.29-shell-sucks
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read t
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 08:50:11AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
[]
> The methods, which are the actual workers doing the configuring will
> most certainly be implemented in shell.
Then call me !
I like shell PITAs. At least it will start to run everywhere by `/bin/sh'
(dash, busybox, bash, zsh,
56 matches
Mail list logo
