On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 04:10:39PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > I must note the coolness of how many more 'secondary' architecture
> > installations we are attaining with etch.
>
> Wouldn't that just be because with Etch we again offer to install popcon
> during new installations? We did not do th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Namuri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package name: gnomeradio
Version : 1.6
Upstream Author : Jörgen Scheibengruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.wh-hms.uni-ulm.de/~mfcn/gnomeradio/
License : GPL
Programmin
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 10:15:40PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:23:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> >> [Michael Hanke]
> >> > To me it looks like stats for the major architectures up to (and
> >> > including
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:23:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
>> [Michael Hanke]
>> > To me it looks like stats for the major architectures up to (and
>> > including) powerpc are ok wrt privacy concerns. Do you agree?
>
>> I'm not sure if that
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 04:23:52PM +0200, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
>
> Bless is a binary (hex) editor, a program that enables you to edit files
> as a sequence of bytes written in C# and using the Gtk# bindings for the
I don't want to edit files as a sequence of bytes written in C#.
I want to edit
2007/5/6, Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Stable Release: 1.5.22
> Development Release of Stable Branch: 1.5.23b
> Daily CVS Snapshot of Stable Branch: 1.5.23c
> Development Release: 1.9f
> Daily CVS Snapshot: 2.1a
>
> Tell me, which version should go to experimental branch? I think the
> da
> Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 6 May 2007 15:45:
> >Actually, it wouldn't be all that difficult. All we have to do is ask.
>
> Ours is available if you're interested.
>
> >My point being,
> >just because it's on project-owned machines that doesn't necessarily
> mean
> >that we'll do
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 11:06:44AM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> >> Version : 2.1a (2007-04-10)
> >> Upstream Author : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> * URL : http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/
> >> * License : GPL
> >> Programming Lang: Shell
> >> Description : Gene
Josip Rodin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 6 May 2007 15:45:
>Actually, it wouldn't be all that difficult. All we have to do is ask.
Ours is available if you're interested.
>My point being,
>just because it's on project-owned machines that doesn't necessarily mean
>that we'll do a particularly
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: bless
Version : 0.5.0
Upstream Author : Alexandros Frantzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://home.gna.org/bless/
* License
On Sunday 06 May 2007 05:07:48 Michael Hanke wrote:
> But sometimes upstream does not agree.
>
> Nevertheless, when they say, 'we provide binaries for Linux', they always
> mean i386 Linux with everything linked statically to a huge binary blob.
>
> I'd really like to be able to provide some hard n
On Sunday 06 May 2007 15:55, Josip Rodin wrote:
> I must note the coolness of how many more 'secondary' architecture
> installations we are attaining with etch.
Wouldn't that just be because with Etch we again offer to install popcon
during new installations? We did not do that with Sarge...
pg
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:40:34AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 11:14:32AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [...]
> >44 0.13% hppa
> >52 0.15% alpha
> >53 0.15% mipsel
> > 171 0.49% sparc
> > 448 1.27% powerpc
> > 615 1.75% arm
> > [
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 12:21:09AM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Pe?a wrote:
> > Looking at the submission numbers from
> > http://popcon.debian.org/>, I am happy to report that the number
> > of Etch installations is increasing fast.
>
> IMHO there are some ways we could track get some better
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:15:07PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > The packaging is mostly clean, as it's a fairly straightforward software
> > package these days.
>
> Out of curiosity, did it ever come with hardware? :-)
Heh. I said 'software package' to avoid the ambiguity of just saying
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:06:45PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> The packaging is mostly clean, as it's a fairly straightforward software
> package these days.
Out of curiosity, did it ever come with hardware? :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Hi everyone,
I'd like to (eventually) give away the Debian package of the gentoo file
manager to someone who uses it. I found that I stopped doing that :/
The packaging is mostly clean, as it's a fairly straightforward software
package these days.
(People who ju
On Sun, 6 May 2007 13:07:48 +0200
Michael Hanke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So far, I only know the general fraction of non-i386 users. But this
> fraction is most likely very different for particular fields (e.g.
> office suite on ARM machines or embedded sutff on AMD64).
(Which is then skewed
* Mike Hommey [Sat, 05 May 2007 22:16:49 +0200]:
> Why not package this as libtool and upload to experimental ?
Moreover, if one reads the bug report mentioned (#221873), it says there
"Thankfully this is already fixed in the upcoming 1.6 release, which is
packaged in the Debian experimental dist
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:23:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:23:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> > [Michael Hanke]
> > > To me it looks like stats for the major architectures up to (and
> > > including) powerpc are ok wrt privacy concerns. Do you agree?
>
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 14:39 +0200, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Torsten Werner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: kbuild
This seems likely to be confused with the Linux kernel build system,
also called kbuild and packaged as linux-kbuild (formerly
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:23:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:23:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> > [Michael Hanke]
> > > To me it looks like stats for the major architectures up to (and
> > > including) powerpc are ok wrt privacy concerns. Do you agree?
>
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 11:23:54AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 06:23:36PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>
> > [Michael Hanke]
> > > To me it looks like stats for the major architectures up to (and
> > > including) powerpc are ok wrt privacy concerns. Do you agree?
>
The cream of the crop for 2007 - GET IN EARLY! DSDI IS SET TO ROCK YOUR
PORTFOLIO!
DSI Direct Sales, Inc.
Symbol: DSDI
Price: $0.04
There is a MASSIVE PROMOTION underway this weekend! This is hot, read
the news and get on DSDI first thing Monday!
You can start from scratch and do all the basics
2007/5/5, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 10:01:32PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: libtool-cvs
>
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 19:25 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Luis Matos dijo [Sun, May 06, 2007 at 02:21:15AM +0100]:
> > oh ... dot com is already taken...
> > http://09-f9-11-02-9d-74-e3-5b-d8-41-56-c5-63.com/
> >
> > best regards
>
> Hey, if you don't have anything to do with your money now that i
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:01:36PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> I belive that a rate of 0.1% is quite an acceptable rate, but we
> permanently try to lower that.
I don't know how much this helps, but wouldn't it be good to more
actively *recommend* the posters to subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Saturday 05 May 2007 19:32, Patryk Ściborek wrote:
> Hello everyone!
Hi. :)
*snip*
> In my opinion second solution is better. I suppose that similar problems
> may occur with other cluster file systems like GFS, so this problem
> should be solved in generic way.
I agree that this should be s
28 matches
Mail list logo