Package: wnpp
Owner: "Robert S. Edmonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: lckdo
Version : 0
Upstream Author : Michael Tokarev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/lckdo.c
* License : public domain
Programming Lang: C
Des
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 01:17:23AM -0400, Mohsen Pahlevanzadeh wrote:
>
> My distro is Debian Etch.
> kernel is 2.6.18
> I have post it to pthread mailing list,They said me that i reinstall
> libc6-dev package,i reinstalled it,But i see given errors.
Hi,
freeglut 2.4.0-5.1 has been built on the i386 build daemon for a week,
but has not been uploaded yet. Could you please have a look?
Thanks,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTEC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear all,
I wrote following code :
#include
#include
#include
int g1=0;
int g2=0;
void *task1(int *counter);
//void task2(int *counter);
void cleanup(int counter1,int counter2);
int main(int argc,char *argv[])
{
pthread_t thr1,thr2;
* Maik Merten:
> gives clear semantics: It's an image.
Animated GIF, anyone?
> gives clear semantics: Video.
Does it begin to run automatically? Can be paused? Saved? What
happens if there are two videos on the same page? Are they
synchronized? Which one gets to play the audio? Is there
Our Last pick Doubled in 48 hours
Get in on Energy Bottom
Critical C A R E New
SYM-C-C-T-I
Currently : 20 Cents, CHEAP!!!
Easy 300% on this one in Short term
This is a Real Business not a fly by night
Get in Monday, Don't Regret later!!
through the 2010-11 season, but the school could fire him
Our Last pick Doubled in 48 hours
Here's your chance
Critical C A R E New
Sym-CCTI
Currently : 20 Cents, CHEAP!!!
This could hit in short and over in the long run
This is a Real Business not a fly by night
Get in Monday, Don't Regret later!!
Martin, a now-deceased former booster, told
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Nacho Barrientos Arias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libtext-worddiff-perl
Version : 0.02
Upstream Author : David Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-WordDiff/
* License : Perl
Prog
Package: wnpp
Owner: Varun Hiremath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: pole
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Ariya Hidayat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL or Web page : http://pole.berlios.de/
* License : BSD
Description : portable library for structured
On Mon, 2007-03-12 at 15:51 -0400, Mark Eichin wrote:
> So:
> * does anyone else find fakechroot useful and would benefit from the
> heavily-repaired version?
I use fakechroot daily to build an installer cd distro based on debian
(of course) and I honestly couldn't live without fakeroot/fake
Holger Levsen schrieb:
> First of all, thanks to Maik for bringing this up here!
Well, I'm a user of free software so this topic is in my very interest ;)
I totally missed you already brought this to the project mailing list -
I fired another mail to debian-project before noticing that. Sorry for
fakechroot is a great idea for reducing the privileges needed for
pbuilder builds, and thus simplifying developer builds of packages.
However, if you look at the current bug set, it turns out that there
are half dozen bugs that actually get in the way of using it for that
purpose (there are anoth
Hi,
added -project to to: as its more appropriate there :)
On Friday 23 March 2007 18:26, Steve Greenland wrote:
> That's all true, but if the standard requires (or recommends) MPEG4
> support, then that's what everyone will use, and we'll be screwed,
> again. If we (the Free Software community)
Hi,
On Friday 23 March 2007 13:54, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> We still have no usable linux-source deb. The prepatched source
> currently shipped will not build vserver, xen and several archs and
> the debian patch is not compatible to make-kpkg and it is undocumented
> how to apply it manualy
Sam Morris schrieb:
> I thought that HTML was going in the other direction--deprecating
> in favour of the already-existing and perfectly logical .
>
> I really can't see what the point of this tag is in the first
> place.
Over at WHATWG it seems most people thinkg is badly broken in
basically
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:39:34PM +, Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 14:26 +0100, Maik Merten wrote:
> > Martijn van Oosterhout schrieb:
> > > Sorry, this doesn't follow. Calling the tag is completely
> > > orthoginal to whether it's implemented by a plugin or no
On Sat, 2007-03-24 at 14:26 +0100, Maik Merten wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout schrieb:
> > Sorry, this doesn't follow. Calling the tag is completely
> > orthoginal to whether it's implemented by a plugin or not. To support
> > it all Firefox et al would need to do is convert it to the equivalent
Martijn van Oosterhout schrieb:
> Sorry, this doesn't follow. Calling the tag is completely
> orthoginal to whether it's implemented by a plugin or not. To support
> it all Firefox et al would need to do is convert it to the equivalent
> tag or whatever internally...
The tag is supposed to offe
On 3/24/07, Maik Merten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Taken that e.g. Mozilla and the KHTML team aren't able to build browsers
with integrated (that's what is for: Video without plugins)
MPEG4 support without the appended patent licenses restricting the
freedom of distribution it's worth to try to
Sam Morris schrieb:
> It's probably more accurate to say that no matter what the standard says,
> Microsoft will ignore it and only implement Windows Media formats, which
> everyone will use, and we'll be screwed. :(
Microsoft is not part of WHATWG. Having a free video format in browsers
like Fi
Andrew Donnellan schrieb:
> But are the MPEG patentors *likely* to sue Debian?
>
> If Debian was sued over the MPEG patents, imagine what Slashdot and
> Digg would do to them - it wouldn't be great PR.
In case of MP3 one of the patent holders *did* take action against
"free" MP3 encoders (the Fra
21 matches
Mail list logo
