On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> AFAICS, post-processing of log messages would be the most reliable
> method to give admins localized logs while also making it feasible
> for upstreams to support user requests. Any problems that would make
> it hard to post-process English logs for loca
> "sean" == sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sean> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 19:29 +, Luis Matos wrote:
>> for example, phpsysinfo installs on /usr/share/phpsysinfo and
>> symb links into /var/www/phpsysinfo.
>>
>> this is ok, but maybe, a better location is sysinfo
On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 11:13:58AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > Am 2007-01-12 07:16:12, schrieb Christian Perrier:
> > > Could you explain us your perception of the harm caused by this?
> > This peoples will ask you for help and send all the logfil
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 21:16 +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:34:18AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:51 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > > Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> > > > I would assert they are not listeni
This one time, at band camp, David Weinehall said:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:34:18AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > It I have to use some archaic command
> > like (btw I don't really mind them *IF* they are well documented) but
> > like:
> > gconftool-2.3-1-9.mark32 -a2 -r4 --/usr/sbin/s
Hello!
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:48:03 +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007, Luca Capello wrote:
>> first of all, I posted to d-d because I think the problem is not
>> restricted to GNOME, but if I'm wrong, please continue this
>> discussion to debian-gtk-gnome (which I cc:ed) and cc: me
On Sun, 2007-01-21 at 09:15 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Please follow the guidelines for Debian mailing lists: don't send me a
> copy of messages unless I ask for one. I read the list.
sorry, i'm still butting heads with my involuntarily new MUA, which
doesn't have a shiny reply-to-list button (yes
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 03:41:06AM +0100, Hendrik Sattler
wrote:
> Am Freitag 19 Januar 2007 21:40 schrieb Christine Cauthen:
> > Must have worked constantly with Solaris 10 and Red Hat
> > within the last 1-2 years.
> [...]
> > a)Your current Word formatted resume
>
> Strange, indeed, to expect
The point and not.
1) debian default installation is for the default user.
default user can simply want to have a localhost with php on it for
development.
So installing on /var/www is good for him.
2) webservers
For a webserver (serves only one vhost) default /var/www is most of
times ok.
3)
On 2007-01-20T15:09-0600 Steve Greenland wrote:
> I disagree. In particular, your method requires more work: I have to
> modify DNS in addition to any other setup work.
True. Updating DNS for Web services is a pain. I usually shoot for a
wildcard entry.
> The nice thing about opinions is that eve
Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 19:35 +, Kai Hendry a écrit :
> Installing Web applications /var/www and serving them with urls like:
>
> example.com/myservice
>
> Is really outdated. It really should be:
>
> myservice.example.com
>
> Served off some sort of vhost structure such as:
>
> /srv/w
sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> hi paul, ben, et al,
Please follow the guidelines for Debian mailing lists: don't send me a
copy of messages unless I ask for one. I read the list.
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 12:34 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> > The methodology used to name subdirectories
On 20-Jan-07, 13:35 (CST), Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Installing Web applications /var/www and serving them with urls like:
>
> example.com/myservice
>
> Is really outdated. It really should be:
>
> myservice.example.com
I disagree. In particular, your method requires more work: I
Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 15:21 +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) a
écrit :
> So Gnome has obviously not 'removed tons of features' (your words), they've
> instead consolidated features, replacing multiple features with single
> better features all over the place?
> And I suppose the mountains
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 19:29 +, Luis Matos wrote:
> for example, phpsysinfo installs on /usr/share/phpsysinfo and symb links
> into /var/www/phpsysinfo.
>
> this is ok, but maybe, a better location is sysinfo or hwinfo. the
> easiest way to do this without handling links is to add an alias in t
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:34:18AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:51 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> > > I would assert they are not listening to their former BIGGEST fans and
> > > users. You can easily fin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there no interest in fixing this even though there's
patch(es!)?
I can make a new one if asked, I'm running with this on
all MY machines anyway. I rather this go into the Debian
GNU/Linux distribution...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/07 13:25, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: dds
> Version : 1.1
> Upstream Author : Bo Haglund et al.
> Section : games
> * URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Christoph Berg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: dds
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : Bo Haglund et al.
Section : games
* URL : http://web.telia.com/~u88910365/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, C++, Python
On 2007-01-20T10:37+0100 sean finney wrote:
> you should change that to be /var/www. the FHS may be ambiguous on the
> matter, but debian policy is fairly pointed that /var/www is the default
> documentroot for any HTTP servers.
I just wanted to quickly say I dislike /var/www.
Installing Web
Sáb, 2007-01-20 às 11:39 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez escreveu:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:28:57AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> >
> > The idea behind using /var/www for all webservers is that the user can
> > install a different webserver and it just servers his/her content. All
> > packaged web ao
On Saturday 20 January 2007 14:21, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 13:34 +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) a
> > IMHO that just means those usability engineers took the easy way out of
> > a scaling problem: instead of adressing the actual problem, they just
> > made sure they
Hi,
On Sat Jan 20, 2007 at 13:51:49 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Stable will be signed by both, online and offline key. Also every point
> > release will be signed by both keys.
> >
> > Greetings
> > Martin
>
> Ok, then where is the "
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 14:13 +, Ross Burton wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 06:34 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Are you telling me that these features I keep see getting removed are
> > *NOT* about usability for me? OK, functionality to me... Functionality
> > for me determines my usability. It
On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 08:28:57AM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> The idea behind using /var/www for all webservers is that the user can
> install a different webserver and it just servers his/her content. All
> packaged web aoolications are put into /var/www too so choosing a
> different root for
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 06:34 -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> Are you telling me that these features I keep see getting removed are
> *NOT* about usability for me? OK, functionality to me... Functionality
> for me determines my usability. It I have to use some archaic command
> like (btw I don't really
A few more examples below. I think lzma isn't the right thing for the
archive. p7zip seems much faster, needs a lot less ram and compression
is similar.
I didn't measure compression times as I find them somewhat
irelevant. A deb is compressed once but downloaded and decompressed a
million times.
Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 13:34 +0100, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) a
écrit :
> By taking out features you decrease the number of goals you can use the
> software for. If you can't use the software for a certain goal at all then
> it's less usable for that goal then a package with an interface fr
Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Stable will be signed by both, online and offline key. Also every point
> release will be signed by both keys.
>
> Greetings
> Martin
Ok, then where is the "Debian Archive offline Signing Key (4.0/etch)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"?
Isn't is high time to
On Saturday 20 January 2007 11:51, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> > I would assert they are not listening to their former BIGGEST fans and
> > users. You can easily find droves rants/discussions of current GNOME
> > users very disgruntled
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
The 'gv' package deserves more care than I did spend on it since I
adopted it. It should be in a reasonable shape, but the BTS needs a
thorough cleanup and there's a bunch of patches that should be synced
with/forwarded to upstream. I'd be glad to hand it over to som
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:51 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> > I would assert they are not listening to their former BIGGEST fans and
> > users. You can easily find droves rants/discussions of current GNOME
> > users very disgruntled
This one time, at band camp, Josselin Mouette said:
> Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> > I would assert they are not listening to their former BIGGEST fans and
> > users. You can easily find droves rants/discussions of current GNOME
> > users very disgruntled with t
Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit :
> I would assert they are not listening to their former BIGGEST fans and
> users. You can easily find droves rants/discussions of current GNOME
> users very disgruntled with the REMOVAL of features that previously were
> there. Some us
On January 20, 2007 at 6:02PM +0900,
susumuo (at debian.org) wrote:
> Hello Kinoshita-san,
>
> I've upload new eb package to unstable.
>
> > Do you plan to go back to activity, or should your package be
> > taken over by someone else?
>
> I'm continuing Debian activity but I can't spend more time.
hi paul, ben, et al,
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 12:34 +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am packaging MyServer (a small web server). By default it expects
> > its document root to be /var/web.
you should change that to be /var/www. the FHS may be ambiguous on t
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 02:50 +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 02:27:23PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> Well we shouldn't keep ourselves hostage of stupid upstream behaviour,
> > >> should we?
> > >
> > > Contrary to us, GNOME (in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Kinoshita-san,
I've upload new eb package to unstable.
> Do you plan to go back to activity, or should your package be
> taken over by someone else?
I'm continuing Debian activity but I can't spend more time. So if you
can, please take over e
38 matches
Mail list logo
