On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 01:45:10AM +0100, Georgy Berdyshev wrote:
> Hello, Paul and all Debian developers!!!
>
> It's great that you're going to package MyServer. If you'll need any
> additional help, just drop a line.
>
> We prefer: /var/web should stay, as it is MyServer's default web
> content
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:03:16PM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote:
> I hadn't seen the mail that added the patch to the bug report - I'll
> work on xdelta this weekend.
that patch should fix interoperability between 64 and 32 bit
I dont know if it addresses security implications...
> thanks
thank yo
Am Freitag 19 Januar 2007 21:40 schrieb Christine Cauthen:
> Must have worked constantly with Solaris 10 and Red Hat within the last 1-2
> years.
[...]
> a)Your current Word formatted resume
Strange, indeed, to expect a Solaris/Linux expert to write a resume on Windows
(ok, MacOS is possible, to
On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 02:27:23PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Well we shouldn't keep ourselves hostage of stupid upstream behaviour,
> >> should we?
> >
> > Contrary to us, GNOME (in this case RedHat) actually employs usability
> > experts. Who are w
Paul Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am packaging MyServer (a small web server). By default it expects
> its document root to be /var/web.
That path shouldn't be created or modified by a Debian package, so
you'll need to change the package so it conforms to Debian policy.
> Am I right to a
Hello, Paul and all Debian developers!!!
It's great that you're going to package MyServer. If you'll need any
additional help, just drop a line.
We prefer: /var/web should stay, as it is MyServer's default web
content location.
But when the Debian developers prefer /var/www:
Can /var/www/myserve
I am packaging MyServer (a small web server). By default it expects its
document root to be /var/web. Am I right to assume I should change this
to /var/www (as in apache2)? The FSH doesn't mention either directory.
Thanks,
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> For the KDE flavour, this takes less than two minutes for downloading
> the packages, but about 5 minutes for unpacking them.
Measured how? Much of the work that dpkg is doing when it prints
"Unpacking replacement foo ..." is not uncompressing.
--
see shy jo
signature.a
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 338 (new: 6)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 82 (new: 1)
Total number of packages requeste
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:28:11AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> this bug's severity was debated a lot; in the end , it was decide to
> downgrade it
> fast forward to today: since I would need to use xdelta across 32bit and
> 64bit archs (see
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=147187;m
Hello world,
I would like to ask a rookie question about the possibility to reassign
by substitution a new loader (/lib/ld-linux.so.2 or alike) to each program.
In fact, I know that it's possible to launch it for example echo by
using /new/path/lib/ld-2.3.2 /new/path/bin/echo but I would like to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: fntsample
Version : >= 2
Upstream Author : Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/fntsample
* License : GPL
Programming
Hello,
System Integration Solutions is searching for the following consultants, please
review the details listed below:
Title: Solaris / Web Administration
Positions: 1
Rate: DOE, let's chat
Duration: 6+ months
Location: San Francisco, CA
Solaris / Web Adm
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having eog and evince in the menu serves the "I want to look at a file I
> know I have on my disk" case. But you can open the file in the same
> number of clicks but with a better interface, by launching a nautilus
> window.
"Better interface" for som
Le jeudi 18 janvier 2007 à 14:55 +0100, Jean-Michel a écrit :
> Package: general
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> samba network share might be automagically mouted in file system.
>
> share partage on computer machine from domain domaine, with user utilisateur
> shoud be
> available in filesystem thr
Le jeudi 18 janvier 2007 à 14:45 +0100, Jean-Michel a écrit :
> Package: general
> Severity: wishlist
>
> On a filesystem which might fragment on low disk space(such as
> ext2/ext3),
> might be the system should detect this condition, and inform, in some
> way, the root, and the user who tries to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julien Danjou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libapache2-mod-defensible
Version : 1.1
Upstream Author : myself
* URL : http://julien.danjou.info/mod_defensible.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description
I've noticed that the eb package is an old version. "new upstream
available" wishlist bug was filed on 2005-02-11, and the upstream
releases were on 2005-05-29, 2005-08-14, 2005-11-26 and 2006-08-31,
but the package hasn't been updated since 2003-09-14.
The maintainer of eb is Susumu OSAWA <[EMAI
Hi,
On Fri Jan 19, 2007 at 13:01:45 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:51:21PM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a
> > wrote:
> >> I thought that the 2007 key was (based on [1]) supposed to be available
> >> early in January and availa
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Well we shouldn't keep ourselves hostage of stupid upstream behaviour,
>> should we?
>
> Contrary to us, GNOME (in this case RedHat) actually employs usability
> experts. Who are we to think we know better?
Actual users?
-Miles
--
`...the Soviet Uni
(Added the MIA team to `Cc' to manage Ryuichi's packages)
On January 11, 2007 at 10:26PM +0900,
tats (at debian.org) wrote:
> On December 20, 2006 at 8:36PM -0600,
> gwolf (at gwolf.org) wrote:
>
> > I just prepared a NMU for toolbar-fancy [1], a package maintained by
> > Ryuichi Arafune. Now, I
Anthony Towns writes:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:51:21PM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a
> wrote:
>> I thought that the 2007 key was (based on [1]) supposed to be available
>> early in January and available in the debian-archive-keyring package. Which
>> doesn't seem to be the case.
>
>
[ debian spamfilters do hate me, resend with different address. ]
Russell Coker wrote:
> Last time I checked the gzip source had no assembler optimisation for systems
> other than i386. So if your 3.2GHz machine (which obviously would be a P4 at
> least not an i386) is running the AMD64 instruc
Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Hindu is an adjective that describes someone whose faith is
>> hinduism. It is not a language.
> And, according to Merriam-Webster[1], a native or inhabitant from India.
> [1] http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?b
Russell Coker wrote:
> Last time I checked the gzip source had no assembler optimisation for systems
> other than i386. So if your 3.2GHz machine (which obviously would be a P4 at
> least not an i386) is running the AMD64 instruction set then you could
> probably improve performance by running
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 05:37:26PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 11:28:11AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote:
> > So the question to d-release team (and to the mantainer) is:
> > should/could I NMU a new version with this patch applied?
> That question isn't one the release team real
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Friday 19 January 2007 02:19, Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For the KDE flavour, this takes less than two minutes for downloading
>> the packages, but about 5 minutes for unpacking them. This is done on a
>> reasonable fast i386 machine
On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:05:41 -0300, Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>
>> Hindu is an adjective that describes someone whose faith is
>> hinduism. It is not a language.
>>
>> manoj
> And, according to Merriam-Webster[1], a native or inhabitant from
> India.
28 matches
Mail list logo
