UNSUBSRCIBE

2007-01-01 Thread Anders.Bissmeier

Re: Bug#405151: ITP: libclamav-client-perl -- A client for the ClamAV virus scanner daemon

2007-01-01 Thread Devin Carraway
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 03:02:52PM +, Stephen Gran wrote: > Can you please test it against the 0.90 rc candidate in experimental and > let me know if you have problems? It makes it easier that this package > isn't targetted for etch, but I'm trying to make sure things are smooth > when clamav

Bug#405230: ITP: python-coverage -- coverage testing tool for Python

2007-01-01 Thread Lars Wirzenius
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: python-coverage Version : 2.6 Upstream Author : Ned Batchelder, Gareth Rees * URL : http://www.nedbatchelder.com/code/modules/coverage.html * License : BSD-like Programm

Bug#405224: ITP: vdr-plugin-epgsearch -- VDR Plugin that provides an extended schedules menu

2007-01-01 Thread Christian Meder
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Christian Meder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Package name: vdr-plugin-epgsearch Version : 0.9.19 Upstream Author : Christian Wieninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> URL : http://freenet-homepage.de/cwieninger/html/vdr-epg-search__english_.html

Re: Bug#405122: ITP: ocamlwc -- count the lines of code and comments in OCaml sources

2007-01-01 Thread Daniel Baumann
Georg Neis wrote: > Hmm, this seems strange to me. What do you suggest? > I bet nearly every long description starts with the name of the > corresponding software. you could replace it with a pronound, here with 'it' :) -- Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist Ema

Bug#405210: ITP: aqualung -- Gapless Gtk-based audio player

2007-01-01 Thread Le_Vert
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Adam Cécile (Le_Vert)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: aqualung Version : 0.9~beta6 Upstream Author : Tom Szilagyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Peter Szilagyi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tomasz Maka <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates

2007-01-01 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 10:20:32PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 01 janvier 2007 à 17:51 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit : > > On Jan 01, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the explanations. Unfortunately that doesn't make these > > > measures really useful, as re

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates

2007-01-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 01 janvier 2007 à 17:51 +0100, Marco d'Itri a écrit : > On Jan 01, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks for the explanations. Unfortunately that doesn't make these > > measures really useful, as rejecting email blindly based on data as > > reliable as RBLs is likely t

Re: Moving conffiles between packages, redux

2007-01-01 Thread Robert Collins
On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 12:40 +, Colin Watson wrote: > But from etch onwards, the job consists of putting the file in a > different package and adding a Replaces. There'd be nothing for a > debhelper program to do. Sure, maybe a year ago it would have been worth > it - but it's now too late to

Bug#405205: ITP: manpages-ca -- Catalan man pages

2007-01-01 Thread Miguel Gea Milvaques
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Miguel Gea Milvaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: manpages-ca Version : 2.39.1 Upstream Author : Multiple authors * URL : Multiple sites (Translated from manpages package) * License : Multiple licences Programmin

site sur charleroi

2007-01-01 Thread kevin
salut venez voir http://spider25.rockweb.org/topsites/index.php?a=in&u=kevinos&sid=hPKMS6ku1y90Ave37hdXG7c92wlJm8Bu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates

2007-01-01 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Jan 01, Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the explanations. Unfortunately that doesn't make these > measures really useful, as rejecting email blindly based on data as > reliable as RBLs is likely to give tons of false positives. This can be easily disproven by anybody w

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates

2007-01-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 01 janvier 2007 à 16:11 +0100, Andreas Metzler a écrit : > One match is sufficient for a deny, afaiui you end up with two > colon delimited lists (one for rbl, one of rhbl) like in > like http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.63/doc/html/spec_html/index.html#toc0325 > Unconditional greylisting.

Re: Bug#405011: ITP: ledger -- command-line accounting program

2007-01-01 Thread Trent Buck
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 03:46:24PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 30 d?cembre 2006 ? 22:24 +1100, Trent Buck a ?crit : > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Trent Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > * Package name: ledger > > Version : 2.5 > > Upstream A

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates

2007-01-01 Thread Andreas Metzler
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le samedi 30 décembre 2006 à 05:34 -0800, Ryan Murray a écrit : [...] >> The exim4 config has been updated to make use of these new fields, >> giving developers the ability to: >> * disable their @debian.org email address entirely with a >>

Re: Bug#405151: ITP: libclamav-client-perl -- A client for the ClamAV virus scanner daemon

2007-01-01 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Devin Carraway said: > * Package name: libclamav-client-perl [snip] > ... this will be uploaded after Etch ships, unless there's some > specific need to upload it to experimental. Upload candidates > are in http://devin.com/debian/ if anyone wants 'em. Can you p

Re: Bug#405011: ITP: ledger -- command-line accounting program

2007-01-01 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Ledger is an accounting tool with the moxie to exist. It provides no > > bells or whistles, and returns the user to the days before user > > interfaces were even a twinkling in their father's CRT. What it does > > offer is a double-entry accounting l

Re: Bug#405011: ITP: ledger -- command-line accounting program

2007-01-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 30 décembre 2006 à 22:24 +1100, Trent Buck a écrit : > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Trent Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > * Package name: ledger > Version : 2.5 > Upstream Author : John Wiegley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://newartisans.co

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates

2007-01-01 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 30 décembre 2006 à 05:34 -0800, Ryan Murray a écrit : > Here's some news on recent db.debian.org changes that are now available: > > The LDAP schema has been updated to include several new fields: > * Date of Birth (developer-only visible) > * Gender (world visible) > *

Re: Bug#405122: ITP: ocamlwc -- count the lines of code and comments in OCaml sources

2007-01-01 Thread Georg Neis
* Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:18:01PM +0100, Georg Neis wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Georg Neis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Please Cc- [EMAIL PROTECTED] for ITP of OCaml-related programs. Sorry. I'll do so in the future. >

Bug#405175: ITP: python-pytils -- Python library for processing strings in Russian

2007-01-01 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: python-pytils Version : 0.2 Upstream Author : Pythy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://gorod-omsk.ru/blog/pythy/projects/pytils/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: Pytho

Re: Bug#405122: ITP: ocamlwc -- count the lines of code and comments in OCaml sources

2007-01-01 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:18:01PM +0100, Georg Neis wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Georg Neis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Please Cc- [EMAIL PROTECTED] for ITP of OCaml-related programs. Also, but maybe you already did that, sorry in that case, please consider joining the pkg-ocaml-m

Re: db.debian.org (and related infrastructure) updates

2007-01-01 Thread Christian Perrier
> 1) I don't see any relevance in having a gender field. The only exception I > might find is for genderifying the texts in web pages and mails, or maybe for > statistics. I see some relevance, speaking for myself. I *do* behave differently with men and women. This is a social issue I fully accep